Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • If this were a child dipping into an adult(s) stash - wouldn't the eldest and youngest be the most likely candidates to do so?
  • Of all the children, why is the one with habitual levels the daughter that Nick has said multiple times is his "favorite"?
From my point of view it seems the CSA is the most likely outcome. I think naysayers are saying that's unlikely just hope that's true for the children's sake.
 
I don't think anyone actually thinks Nick gave his daughter cocaine, but I absolutely think his 'favorite' daughter who both he and Kayla say is clingy would be around them enough to he constantly exposed, unlike his older kids who probably stay far away from mom and dad.

I want to say 'surely it can't get worse' for him, but after the stream rants further fucking himself of accusing officers by name of perjury, it's not looking good.

His lawyer absolutely has to be advising him to shut the fuck up and stop streaming, right? Can his lawyer drop him if he keeps saying stupid shit?
no. I 100% believe he did. he's a low life sack of shit that used God to shield himself for years. I'll say once again, he needs to either die in prison or kill himself. there is no redemption.
 
Nah I think he does, testing that high isn't an environmental exposure hit, it's direct consumption. Routine direct consumption at that.
I see only one of two explanations being the reason why she had so much in her hair follical:

A: Her father was giving her repeated "small" doses of cocaine to "treat" her ADHD and "violent outbursts"

B: She saw her parents, April, and Aaron do coke and did it herself and kept using. (Maybe once they found their then 8 year old doing their coke, they tried to wean her off?)

This child had repeated doses of cocaine, I do not believe she could have hid it from her parents for very long.

I do not believe an elementary aged child can do coke multiple times without accidentally killing herself via overdose.
 
I don't think anyone actually thinks Nick gave his daughter cocaine, but I absolutely think his 'favorite' daughter who both he and Kayla say is clingy would be around them enough to he constantly exposed, unlike his older kids who probably stay far away from mom and dad.

I want to say 'surely it can't get worse' for him, but after the stream rants further fucking himself of accusing officers by name of perjury, it's not looking good.

His lawyer absolutely has to be advising him to shut the fuck up and stop streaming, right? Can his lawyer drop him if he keeps saying stupid shit?
I do.

In fact, I believe he did worse. I believe he diddled that little girl and was using cocaine to keep her compliant, and others I've spoken to irl believe the same.

Nick has stated she was his favorite. Both Nick and Kayla have stated they believe she was or could become violent.

A "favorite" is often the target of sexual abuse. Violence, even psychotic-seeming violence is a common sign of sexual abuse. Look up the Mary Bell case out of the UK for a nighmare example.

I hope Minnesota CPS is competent and has that girl in good hands because if she ever wants a chance at a normal life, she needs help now. Inshallah, my suspicious are wrong.
 
There's a waiver of the license requirement if the kin are actively seeking a license, and if granted, it is then effectively accepted nunc pro tunc (from the time of the application). CHIPS isn't going to say where they specifically are for obvious reasons.
Given some recent posts and discussions I think it’s most likely Nick’s parents have the kids and they have actively prevented Kayla’s family from intervening or fostering the kids.

Like when the cops came and someone had to be called about the kids they either had Nick’s dad at the ready or were willing to let the kids go to rando foster placement rather than the kids going with Kayla’s family.

When kids are taken the state asks the parents to provide a list of relatives that the kids could be placed with - it’s a priority. I’m betting none of Kayla’s family was listed by Nick.

I’d assume Kayla’s parents or sister hoped the CPS intervention would result in the kids being placed with them, so therefore Nick would do anything to prevent that, including letting the kids go to strangers instead.
 
I don't think anyone actually thinks Nick is an alcoholic, junkie, wife swapping, balldo wearing, tranny simping, man licking, reckless driving, court-dodging, client scamming, child endangering

wait, what were we talking about?

Good point.

I still think he wasn't grooming the kid for sex abuse and was instead just a junkie fuckhead who evidence shows was leaving the house messed up and dirty and probably just had drugs laying about.

I gotta cling to the one shred of light as this gets darker and darker.
 
I don't think anyone actually thinks Nick gave his daughter cocaine
I do. There really is no other believable rational explanation for the amount of cocaine byproducts found in her hair.

An 8 year old is not going to just go and start doing lines on her own. 13, 14 sure. But 8? No. Not unless she was watching her parents and "Daddy's Cock Sock" do it. Somebody showed her how. Somebody got her to try it. And honestly I think it's just the kind of thing King Nick would find utterly hilarious while drunk and stoned at 3am.

Any other explanation falls apart with the realization that none of the other kids tested positive. So it likely wasn't environmental. And this was Nick's favorite daughter. The problem child likely to murder him in his sleep. The one that would be up at 3am like him. The one that was just like him (poor kid).

I'm sure there would be some sort of logic path to giving a kid coke that would make sense to a drunk stoned strung out narcissist at 3am. But don't ask me what it is.

I still say testing the dog for drugs would probably be informative. The adults in the home were living life like they imagined college should have been. Among the idiot ideas was surely "see if the dog likes it!"
 
It's vile. But it's also the first thing that snapped into the minds of every CPS, Law Enforcement and DA that saw the report of the 9 year old daughters drug tests. Every Single One of Them Had the Same First Thought.

House full of adult sexual deviant lolbertarian junkies + 8 year old girl testing positive for "regular or weekly use/injestion" of the deviant junkies favorite candy = XXX
You must be in a creepy area where "House full of adult sexual deviant lolbertarian junkies + 8 year old girl testing positive" is enough of a trend to be a thing. LA?

Typically I would expect this kind of worry when a house full of crackheads end up getting strung out because they can't afford more crack so they end up renting out their kid.
 
So many people are buying into or at least entertaining the excuse that the test could come back positive because of cocaine ON the child’s hair. Thats NOT the way the test works. The test looks for METABOLITES created when cocaine is broken down by the body after injestion. These metabolites are present IN the hair, not ON it. Think about it, if all it took to beat a hair follicle test was to wash your hair before the test then the test would be worthless.

Nick Rekieta’s 9 year old daughter had a hair follicle test performed on her along with all her siblings. While her siblings tests came back negative, her test came back HIGH positive for the metabolites created by the body when it breaks down cocaine and those metabolites are found in the hair follicle/shaft, not on it.

Either she got into the stuff herself, or someone in the house dosed her. Simple as.
And a high reading for a 9 y/o 50lb child can mean a lot less cocaine exposure than for an adult. It's similar to why a 100lb woman has a larger BAC after a single drink vs a 250lb man. She's just as slammed as an adult but exposed to a lot less coke.
 
Charges for what?

Aaron doesn’t have a duty of care to Nick’s kids. If he knew and said nothing, it’s shitty but not illegal.

"I would speculate that, in the case that this is true, there is another component to this, which is why Aaron agreed to get access to another family."

Do I need to spell it out further than that? It's schizo and unproven to this point but I'm betting there's a reason why Aaron made it look like he's doing this tell all cut & run thing, and then more and more he didn't say keeps coming out.

REEE! AN EIGHT YEAR OLD WOULDN'T EVEN KNOW HOW TO DO COCAINE!!!

I guess I'm the only one who remembers kids sniffing pixie stix in elementary school.
There's kids who get hooked on drugs and alcohol between 6 and 10 years old especially if supplied/demonstrated by parents either intentionally or not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back