Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
So she's only as messed up as the rest of those kids finding out that their parents love drugs more than them.

Even worse, they're with grampa Rackets who is definitely balldoguarding.
>grampa rackets is balldo guarding

I really dont understand this take. Why wouldnt a father try to protect his son, even if he doesnt really deserve it? Hes not here on the kiwifarms, and he raised nick and saw him grow up from birth into a respectable man. From his perspective this could be a serious stumble, but not so egregious that he cant come back from it, especially if his father is a man of faith. Id hope in my darkest hour my father wouldnt speak ill of me to my children and abandon me.

I just wish Icky Nicky would show some kind of remorse, even if its just incidental, in regards to what he did to the kids. Why bother streaming with this floating cloud of radiation hanging over your head? Its baffling, but Ive also never drilled holes in my brain with coke.
 
I'm trying to weigh which would be the best-case scenario here:
  • That he gave his child crack
  • That his wife gave his child crack
  • That his wife was on crack nine years ago, making the child a crack baby, and that the child's hair has never been cut
Best case scenario would be that this is all a bizarre lab mix up. That would mean this poor kid wasn't actually exposed to cocaine.

But as much as I want to laugh at government incompetence, I highly, highly doubt this is the case here.

So now we're left with what level of abusive Nick was with his kids.
 
Why would I assume someone was pimping their kid using drugs? Because that's what drug addicts do with their kids. Give them drugs to do "favors."
Yeah a drunk drugfucked loser would never just be too busy doing drugs to properly supervise his kids, while living in a house that has drugs lying around because drug addicts live in it. That would never happen. What's far more likely is he set up a pedophile brothel to pimp out his child to Vic Mignogna.

The fact that your mind goes there at all makes you sus, but the fact that you're insisting it's the most likely scenario makes you a complete retard.
 
In fifteen years, she's going to be sitting down with her boyfriend and telling him about that one time she got into Dad's coke stash by accident and felt like shit for a few days, and how their house was subsequently raided by the cops and so they all had to go stay with gram gram and paw paw for a while. Her boyfriend will go "wow holy shit that's nuts" and she'll reply with "yeah my parents were real cunts, even the way they died was embarrassing. My no good drunken father left a sex toy wet with lube on top of his computer and it burnt the house down. Killing him, my mother and some other woman. I forget her name I think it was Abigail or something. "
Fixed it.
 
Some of you guys need a hobby instead of debating on the 9 year old is being sex trafficked. Nothing in either filling has suggested sexual trauma, that's probably the first thing they search for during situations like this. Could further evidence indicate such things happen, maybe but it's gross and irresponsible to suggest that without anything substantial.
 
I believe that Nick Rekieta was in cahoots with reptilian aliens from zeta reticuli who were using cocaine as an anesthetic in their secret operations where they harvested his daughter's eggs to create a master reptilian race since all the female zeta reticulans turned into pooners because the reptilian overlords don't allow females to go on space explorations.

Think about it.
 
View attachment 6101576
WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.
I wonder what will happen to his channel once he's found guilty. They may delete it, they do that once in a while to criminals. The once highest super chatters cash going up his and the nine-year-olds nose. Not a good look for YouTube. But not the first time the platform has been responsible for the victimization of children.
The only vestige of Nick in a year may be a series of Jim Can't Swim style videos of the released body cams and interrogations. I'm nearly confident that pilled out Kayla and Imholte will make an appearance in the interrogation room. I'm also curious how much Nick himself spilled. Egotistically thinking he was playing games with the cops.

A strong harvest this year, but at what cost?
Nick is a beast, he's not even human. He lies to consume more cocaine and inflict misery on his family for as long as possible. Before he's put in a cage, like any impulse ruled beast must be.
Greed would have been a far more noble pursuit.

I hope he earns a million dollars.
 
Last edited:
I wonder what will happen to his channel once he's found guilty. They may delete it, they do that once in a while to criminals. The once highest super chatters cash going up his and the nine-year-olds nose. Not a good look for YouTube. But not the first time the platform has been responsible for the victimization of children.
The only vestige of Nick in a year may be a series of Jim Can't Swim style videos of the released body cams and interrogations. I'm nearly confident that pilled out Kayla and Imholte will make an appearance in the interrogation room. I'm also curious how much Nick himself spilled. Egotistically thinking he was playing games with the cops.

A strong harvest this year, but at what cost?
Nick is a beast, he's not even human. He lies to consume more cocaine and inflict misery on his family for as long as possible. Before he's put in a cage, like any impulse ruled beast must be.
Greed would have been a far more noble pursuit.

I hope he earns a million dollars.
There is precedent for YouTube deleting channels once its owner is convinced for child abuse

Look up Austin Jones
 
Last edited:
The measurement of pg/mg is of concentration of metabolites in the hair per mg of hair. That's already taken into account. For a kid to test at adult levels of use they were likely getting blasted on drugs, or the test was fake. High numbers indicate tolerance and regular use.
That doesn't make sense. Think about what it takes to make hair. If it takes a gram of keratin to make a gram of hair, that's not going to change for child to adult. Then it becomes a ratio of metabolite to keratin in the blood. There is a lot less keratin by weight in a childs blood. That means there is a lot less metabolite by weight in a childs blood for the same reading in the hair.

Just like it may take 3 beers in a 250lb man to get a 0.08% BAC, a 9 y/o girl may only need 1/2 a beer. BAC is similar ratio (could easily be grams instead of mLs). A girl that blows 0.08 is just as buzzed but with a lot less alcohol. They don't need more alcohol to get to 0.08, they need less.
 
There is a lot less keratin by weight in a childs blood. That means there is a lot less metabolite by weight in a childs blood for the same reading in the hair.

Just like it may take 3 beers in a 250lb man to get a 0.08% BAC, a 9 y/o girl may only need 1/2 a beer. BAC is similar ratio (could easily be grams instead of mLs). A girl that blows 0.08 is just as buzzed but with a lot less alcohol. They don't need more alcohol to get to 0.08, they need less.
It's true that a child hits a higher serum level of a given substance for an ingested dose. If you had stopped there you would be generally correct, although the relationship of serum concentration to hair sequestration probably isn't linear. However, there is 0 keratin in blood. Keratin is synthesized by the tissues that deposit it, in hair that would be the follicle. You shouldn't invent mechanistic explanations for something you don't understand, because typically you will be wrong and it makes you look stupid.
 
I believe that Nick Rekieta was in cahoots with reptilian aliens from zeta reticuli
All he got was this lousy t shirt and chemical dependency!
@Watching Rekieta alcohol/body weight is as much drug dosing method as mg/kg which is used more medically. A 9 year old testing for 10x the positive cutoff indicates tolerance aka regular use.
If Nick is 68 kilos , and a 9 year old is 26 kilos, he weighs 2.61x as much as her. She needs to consume 38% as much drugs as him to test positive for cocaine. And she's 10x the positive cutoff. I genuinely hope the police faked the test, for everyone's sake. The idea of a child testing at 10x the positive cutoff is heartbreaking.

@Konstantin Romanov Excellent point I was thinking about this and looked up this link earlier. Drug tests are possible because imperfections in the body reliably deposit these metabolites in the hair.
 
Last edited:
I agree with all of that except that the kids are in foster care, not with meemaw and pawpaw.
As I have stated in this thread and the main thread, unless every single relative has told the kids to fuck off, the children are almost certainly with relatives. I have done a significant amount of research on the matter and have posted ample evidence to support this conclusion.
 
Their house is not a BTK house of horrors.
Wait until this turns out to be optimistic.
I think it's safe to say with near-absolute certainty that the kid was exposed to cocaine at the very least, and we can lean towards assuming she ingested it, but yeah, if Nick's planning to argue that the test only indicates exposure we should at least wait until we see it before we start screeching that it's impossible.
Getting married to any one hypothesis over another is retarded because they're all wall material.
Some of you guys need a hobby instead of debating on the 9 year old is being sex trafficked. Nothing in either filling has suggested sexual trauma, that's probably the first thing they search for during situations like this. Could further evidence indicate such things happen, maybe but it's gross and irresponsible to suggest that without anything substantial.
The fact some people seem compelled to go there is giving me the fucking creeps. Quit being sick weirdos please.
 
Last edited:
My dick is 10.2 nigger cocks long.
images.jpeg
Nick is 68 kilos , and a 9 year old is 26 kilos, he weighs 2.61x as much
Blah blah blah if Dax Herrera did not dress up as a cow to get fucked in the ass by his mistress, and Christopher Gesualdi was not a pedophile, and Maddox was not a petty spiteful bitch towards people who did him literally nothing wrong, and...
Kid ingested cocaine in sufficient amount to test 10x above the cutoff level for metabolites. What it means is there's 0.000000000000000000000000000% chance his 9yo daughter did not ingest cocaine in the past few months, which is what the court will give a shit about.
 
Well yeah if they're hyperventilating and have a really elevated heart rate and stuff you should probably give them a spot off your heroin foil to calm them down a little but otherwise there's not really much you can do.

In a hair test we can reasonably assume they tested for cocaine, benzoyglonine, norcocaine and cocaethylene at the very least, and maybe, if they were going extra, a couple of less common ones.

I think it's safe to say with near-absolute certainty that the kid was exposed to cocaine at the very least, and we can lean towards assuming she ingested it, but yeah, if Nick's planning to argue that the test only indicates exposure we should at least wait until we see it before we start screeching that it's impossible.
Not directed to you, but here we go again on the "perhaps she was just exposed to it" argument. Whereas almost any incidental search will show that a reading of 5000 indicates with certainty ingestion, and in fact indicates a reasonable use of the drug or a single high dose in the least.

The cut off is 500, she tested positive at 5,000. How many times has a white trash parent had their argument in court that "Ya Honna, the kid just inhaled microscopic amounts from the HVAC blowing some of the particles off the coffee table! Why, our kid never ingested!!!"

CPS isn't going to have their entire lab process which has been honed over decades of having to argue this shit in court time and time again, torn down by Nick and friends just because he thinks he's smarter. They have case data and science on thousands of cases all pertaining to kids and know exactly how much cocaine she had to the gram, this isn't new territory for them, they specialize in child doses to argue in court, to strip parental rights from citizens and they have expert witnesses that are almost impenetrable on the stand, not like they need to when they have a reading of 10X the cut off.

She didn't touch cocaine to get a 5,000 reading, she ingested it, and a very good amount of it, not a bump, not 2 bumps, a good amount. It didn't read 500, or 1,000 (twice the cut off) or 2,000 or 4,000, it read 5,000, 1000% more than the cut off.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back