🐮 Lolcow Mohammad Shafiq Khan - the man who disproved physics.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Dynastia said:
The NSA only spies on terrorists, dummy.
Click to expand...
I was playing CoD one time and this dude kept watching me throw grenades in baskets and watching them soar high in the sky, so I jokingly messaged him, "You NSA or something?" and he left the game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
High-Tech Redneck said:
Does your semen not come from your spine? Weirdo.
Click to expand...
Fun fact: for semen to ooze from the come out from the spine, it means that the prostate must be somewhere between vertebrae. This would mean every time the spinal column bends (such as when leaning or sleeping in weird positions) the prostate would get stimulated. It's also well-known that the prostate is really sensible to stimulation.

Therefore, by kebab logic, men orgasm each time they bend down. Remove kebab you are worst anatomist.
 
Sczylak Madgar said:
Fun fact: for semen to ooze from the come out from the spine, it means that the prostate must be somewhere between vertebrae. This would mean every time the spinal column bends (such as when leaning or sleeping in weird positions) the prostate would get stimulated. It's also well-known that the prostate is really sensible to stimulation.

Therefore, by kebab logic, men orgasm each time they bend down. Remove kebab you are worst anatomist.
Click to expand...

So when muslim men bow down to pray five times a day... they're actually...

:surprised:
 
Jashinist said:
They're meaning that they orgasm while bending over without a man standing behind them, Dynastia. Your situation is different.
Click to expand...

Huh. I'll try it without a man standing behind me if the situation ever comes up, but Null is pretty attentive to my needs.
 
F. Hausdorff said:
It's honestly not deep at all. I'm actually reading the first ten pages or so and he largely uses nothing more than high school algebra. Then grossly misinterprets his results.
Click to expand...
He's using Algebra? Fuck, this dude makes me look like a retard.

Exceptional individual, also known as retar.d
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My housemate is a physics major, I gotta show him this. He'll be dismayed to learn that everything he knows is a lie. Poor guy, all those wasted years.
 
I'm always bothered by people like him who believe that science works in ways that it really doesn't. For example, he cites that no one wants to respond to his paper because it's right when the common consensus I have heard from professors such as one working in Tokyo at a particle accelerator is that they will always look for people to challenge their ideas because it puts them to the test. While Khan here constantly defends his theories and ignores previous evidence no matter how crackpot his stuff sounds, he refuses to adhere to one of the simplest rules of thumb in the book. If no one's paying attention you didn't explain it well enough.
 
Pandas Galore said:
I'm always bothered by people like him who believe that science works in ways that it really doesn't. For example, he cites that no one wants to respond to his paper because it's right when the common consensus I have heard from professors such as one working in Tokyo at a particle accelerator is that they will always look for people to challenge their ideas because it puts them to the test. While Khan here constantly defends his theories and ignores previous evidence no matter how crackpot his stuff sounds, he refuses to adhere to one of the simplest rules of thumb in the book. If no one's paying attention you didn't explain it well enough.
Click to expand...
Yeah, scientists can differentiate dumbasses from intellectual sparring partners.
 
I honestly hate how he cites himself as a source. Major jerkass move.
This is what citing yourself basically is:
"I think this is true."
"How can you prove that?"
"Well, I said something about it before."
"Makes perfect sense."
 
BestCommenter said:
I honestly hate how he cites himself as a source. Major jerkass move.
This is what citing yourself basically is:
"I think this is true."
"How can you prove that?"
"Well, I said something about it before."
"Makes perfect sense."
Click to expand...

He even advertises his own comments on articles with his full name, as if he isn't actually talking about himself.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom