- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
He literally posted something on Facebook an hour ago; another copy pasta of his thesis in a comment on an article.
Lolcow Mohammad Shafiq Khan - the man who disproved physics.
- Thread starter Jashinist
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
He literally posted something on Facebook an hour ago; another copy pasta of his thesis in a comment on an article.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
This Mohammad Shafiq Khan/Mohammed Shafiq Khan debacle points out the foibles in having a name with so many fucking variations.
- Joined
- May 21, 2015
I think Google also does some shuffling to your search results based on your search history unless you explicitly turn that off.
Also: we don't want him to find the farms. It's more fun if they just go on their way, being crazy and we mock it here. When they find the farms is when you get threads like Shaner's where it's thirty trillion shitposts for every good post.
Also: we don't want him to find the farms. It's more fun if they just go on their way, being crazy and we mock it here. When they find the farms is when you get threads like Shaner's where it's thirty trillion shitposts for every good post.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
Does whatever the fuck Newton did with inertia count as physics? If so, Mohammad is about to get BTFO'd.
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
The struggle of having the most common first name and the most common first name assigned to the "Khan" last name, while trying to become famous and recognised, is real.
http://names.mooseroots.com/l/665/Khan
"Mohammad Khan", #1. No wonder he has to add in a middle name.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
I'd just like to say that the Qu'ran is not a good source for scientific theses (but it is for scientific faeces!) In fact, apart from turds, the only thing it is a good source on is Islam, and even then that's arguable!
Yeah, I know about three different Mohammed (or varients) Khan's! Hell things are so bad at work that we have to specify which Mohammed (or varients) we're talking about!
Yeah, I know about three different Mohammed (or varients) Khan's! Hell things are so bad at work that we have to specify which Mohammed (or varients) we're talking about!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
Thesis: Khannie Boy is wrong because I can push a shopping cart forwards and it goes. That's physics.
Sources: Wikipedia.
Sources: Wikipedia.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
My Thesis Paper:
Mohammad has no actual proof of anything he states aside from citing himself (which, as previously discussed does not work), and his "argument" of calling any opposers retarded makes him look like a man child.
SOURCES:
-Anyone who has ever used the word "retarded" in an argument.
Mohammad has no actual proof of anything he states aside from citing himself (which, as previously discussed does not work), and his "argument" of calling any opposers retarded makes him look like a man child.
SOURCES:
-Anyone who has ever used the word "retarded" in an argument.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
I was joking about wikipedia, but if you go on wikipedia, it shows you physics working.
Mohammad got disproved by Wikipedia. Rekt.
Mohammad got disproved by Wikipedia. Rekt.
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2013
Take it from my scientific cousin!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
This is the best thing ever.
We're in the middle of the second page for me now. What about ya'll?
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
As a for-reals science guy (sorry to powerlevel), there's actually loads of terrible grammar in the literature just because so much work is done by smart people who speak English as a second language. Most of it gets corrected by journal copy editors, but there's plenty of dubious English that winds up in print.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
While we wait, let's do some more digging.
EDIT: I have dug:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/08/28/im-all-for-concentrating-the-stupid-in-one-place/
He is the third comment here. He does some shameless self promotion, then gets proven wrong a lot until the comment thread gets locked. Thoughts?
EDIT: I have dug:
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/08/28/im-all-for-concentrating-the-stupid-in-one-place/
He is the third comment here. He does some shameless self promotion, then gets proven wrong a lot until the comment thread gets locked. Thoughts?
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2014
Great digging, you dug the thing I linked in the OP, that was a whole 9 pages ago.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
Damnit. I forgot.Great digging, you dug the thing I linked in the OP, that was a whole 9 pages ago.
Well, I guess I've brought it to everyone's attention again then.
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
This dude needs to practice his English more.
Elegantisimo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
I think that wouldn't help his point, to be honest
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2015
I'm assuming he isn't a native English speaker, seeing as he lives in India (apparently). I think I'm gonna go back and look at him being butthurt on some forum and give you guys some choice quotes, if any.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
I'd like to hear him explain how airplanes fly, if everything we know about physics is wrong. I'll try to read his paper when I have time but I ain't no good with them there fancy sciences.