It actually goes deeper than that though, Angelo, though you make outstanding points worthy of a Semper Fidelis, and your work does set me up for giving this bit of elaboration:
Whether commercial, literary, or those rare works that straddle the line, the Gaffot crowd (and indeed, many SocJus types) seem to hate them all the same. It doesn't matter what the actual work is, its merits, or its flaws; they will find the most transparently stupid reason to hate something, often while provably demonstrating they know almost nothing about what they're complaining about in the process. Similarly, works that somehow manage to slip past their arsenal of tests (a rarity)
will get their seal of approval - and, more often than not, absolutely suck. More on that in a moment.
Below this obvious case of kibitzing over vidya/movies/etc they disapprove of, and their seemingly hunting down works to specifically hate, festering under the surface like a canker sore is the actual, honest-to-god, core reason they keep fucking doing it. It's a strange chord that runs through these circles and is just as baffling to the uninitiated now as it was when it was first seen in the wild:
That a great many Social Justice types, in truth,
hate the very concept of escapism itself.
While they'll generally cloak this hate in any of a number of ways (traditionally by focusing on specific works - often by arguing parts of said work are inherently bad ("this work's portrayal of X is insensitive/this character is too sexy, change it") or that the work is somehow
inherently offensive (by being racist/sexist/fill-in-the-blank-ist), the truth is that the underlying belief of many Social Justice warriors is that any concept of escapism will only allow you to hear something other than the almighty narrative, and
that cannot be allowed.
This is why so many SJW-made works of fiction fail, whether they're video games, books, or otherwise: Social Justice Warriors are fundamentally are unable divorce themselves from the very narrative they are trying to push, and so they create works that do literally nothing but
foster said narrative. This is also why, if they outright tank a property (as they did to Marvel Comics) their response shows that they aren't angry about the loss of potential to tell a good story or provide entertainment for the reader,
but of the loss of the ability to push the narrative itself.
They fundamentally
do not want you to have the ability to take joy or comfort in things that have nothing to do with their agenda.