NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

ghjfgjhgfjhjhgh.png

It would be very funny if someone went into their artist thread and started critiquing their shitty illustrations like this and then started accusing them of posting AI art
 
View attachment 4079349

It would be very funny if someone went into their artist thread and started critiquing their shitty illustrations like this and then started accusing them of posting AI art
First time in a while posting on this thread to say that people still critiquing A.I. art in this fashion is just proof that A.I. art did nothing wrong. If a user like this is that picky to complain about stuff like this, then why won’t they post their art for their users to compare and critique?
 
Hold on, I just realized a hypocrisy in these people against AI art. I ducking know these have to be the same people that were all for the “screenshot NFTs” meme, but would also complain if you reposted their non-NFT art. What’s the difference? No one’s losing anything. This goes especially for AI art since it doesn’t even resemble the very things that are “stolen.” Where is the standard?
If Stonetoss is reading this, I think you can make a comic out of this.
 
View attachment 4079349

It would be very funny if someone went into their artist thread and started critiquing their shitty illustrations like this and then started accusing them of posting AI art
It's an odd problem because it's something that can "draw perfectly" but has no awareness nor capacity for understanding visual information the way we do. Their art is crappy but the parts are generally in the right place if shoddily done, this is "perfectly" "drawn", but things aren't where they are supposed to be located, normally. It's like if Picasso was blind from birth, or some other weird metaphor.

So really on the whole their critiques are worthless as there's no actual technique issues. I'd challenge any one of them to do better in the condition this algorithm is doing it, which would be in a completely dark and soundproofed room, while in a drunken stupor. If for no other reason than the hilarious results.
 
dfgdfgfghdgdg.png

Tranny angry because director values pregnant women

You will never be a woman, Larry
 
Last edited:
View attachment 4079349

It would be very funny if someone went into their artist thread and started critiquing their shitty illustrations like this and then started accusing them of posting AI art
Gotta love people being so smug by pointing out flaws in AI art like it means anything. As if human-made art is free of any mistakes or blemishes.
 
Gotta love people being so smug by pointing out flaws in AI art like it means anything. As if human-made art is free of any mistakes or blemishes.
So far, any actually good AI I've seen has been from people with actual artistic skill who put a good deal of effort into massaging what comes out of it after they give it very specific positive and negative prompts, tweak the model, and do all other kinds of shit I can't do.

I suppose it's okay if you want to generate thousands of throwaway waifus and pony avatars, but any actual artist threatened by that is, well, isn't one really.
 
So far, any actually good AI I've seen has been from people with actual artistic skill who put a good deal of effort into massaging what comes out of it after they give it very specific positive and negative prompts, tweak the model, and do all other kinds of shit I can't do.

I suppose it's okay if you want to generate thousands of throwaway waifus and pony avatars, but any actual artist threatened by that is, well, isn't one really.

you dont understand, its 100% plagiarism and is literally throwing millions of artists on the street and directly impacting the ultra lucrative careers of countless professionals and if you disagree:

dfgdfgdfgdfsdsd.png
 
So far, any actually good AI I've seen has been from people with actual artistic skill who put a good deal of effort into massaging what comes out of it after they give it very specific positive and negative prompts, tweak the model, and do all other kinds of shit I can't do.

I suppose it's okay if you want to generate thousands of throwaway waifus and pony avatars, but any actual artist threatened by that is, well, isn't one really.
I've seen numerous good bits of AI art by people who only know how to plug in words into a program. Generic, sure, but still aesthetically pleasing. Honestly more often than not I like the weird shit people make by throwing in random words and seeing what sticks.
 
you dont understand, its 100% plagiarism and is literally throwing millions of artists on the street and directly impacting the ultra lucrative careers of countless professionals and if you disagree:
Or maybe I just don't give a shit what happens to worthless subhumans like Nepenthe and furfags in general.
 
It's kind of interesting seeing a new "progressive" stance form and then force itself into every unrelated conversation to reinforce itself to become dogma.

View attachment 4081965
That user really brought Chainsaw Man into this. Typical latching onto popular cultural entertainment to gain more following by thinking that your cultured for pats on the back.
 
Twitter bans 6 journalists and resetera goes insane

fghfghfghfghddffh.png
dfgdgfhfhfgh.png

that thread was locked but theres a new one

 
Twitter bans 6 journalists and resetera goes insane

View attachment 4084110
View attachment 4084122

that thread was locked but theres a new one

Silencing of dissent on Twitter is bad...as your site regularly tosses out bans for white fragility, concern trolling, dismissal commentary, and other forms of dissent.

"Rules for thee but not for me" strikes again.
 
Bro it's literally a retarded trashfire of a website barely 2% of the American population uses. It's not a fucking country in the physical world. If Elon bans people that's not equivalent in any way to rounding them up and killing them, in fact it does them a service as they'd be forced to go outside. I'd ask if this user has ever logged off and touched grass but I'm gonna go ahead and guess no.
 
If it's online that means I have legal access to it, I'm not just stealing it, and I'm entirely entitled to make transformative fair use of it.

No it isn't, it's literally the law. Something with "substantial noninfringing uses" doesn't get outlawed simply because it can be used for something illegal. Sony v. Universal (the "Betamax case").
Again false argument. Websites can chose not to be scraped. And things can be set to private. No one is even mentioning transformative use etc because it isn't the point.

Another false arguments, people doesn't asked to outlaw ai, you made up the cheating argument yourself. People asked to separate ai categories and manual categories, and people ask for the choice of not being part of the scraping.

Bro it's literally a retarded trashfire of a website barely 2% of the American population uses. It's not a fucking country in the physical world. If Elon bans people that's not equivalent in any way to rounding them up and killing them, in fact it does them a service as they'd be forced to go outside. I'd ask if this user has ever logged off and touched grass but I'm gonna go ahead and guess no.
But twitter is the world for them, anything with a thousand retweets means the society has spoken. Unfortunately, this is a viewpoint held not just by resetera.
That's why Chapelle got shit on twitter, but it's raking in profits for netflix.
 
you dont understand, its 100% plagiarism and is literally throwing millions of artists on the street and directly impacting the ultra lucrative careers of countless professionals and if you disagree:

View attachment 4081221
This is what happens when you try to turn a hobby into a job: you think you’re hot shit until you realize you’re not making good money because you don’t have a real job, so you get aggressive over anything they could threaten your fake job.
 
It does feel like, especially in Nepenthes case, this has been something they can immediately latch onto as an "attack" on their "job" which in their head somehow legitimizes their chosen "profession." Something they can show their parents to try and prove that what they are doing is somehow worthwhile.
 
Last edited:
It's rather comical to me that not very long ago these same fools were laughing at people that worked warehouses or drove vehicles for a living because automation was totally coming for their jobs just around the corner. But now that machine learning is threatening artists first, they are suddenly all luddites who hate technology and want more laws to protect workers from losing their jobs.

Ain't karma a bitch?
 
Back