NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus


If A Thief Breaks Into Your Home, Is It Wrong To Shoot Them?

While a surprising number of answers are pretty reasonable, the insane ones are still strikingly insane.

"Just yell at them, tell them to leave!"

I have to wonder how many of the "No, don't shoot an intruder!" whiny fucks are single men, with no wife or children. If the consequence of inaction ends up being that you, your wife, or your child gets raped, does that change their opinion at all? I have to suspect that a fair number of these people don't have anyone they feel obligated to protect, and since they're hetero males they never suspect that sexual violence might be on the table.

Thanks to that thread though, for making me remember that I have a shotgun at home, but no shells in the house. I will try and buy some ammo in the next week or so.
 
Would you take a homeless moderator into your house?

1680968634261.png
 
Morrigan in that thread proving that even an idiot can be right about something from time to time.
 

If A Thief Breaks Into Your Home, Is It Wrong To Shoot Them?

While a surprising number of answers are pretty reasonable, the insane ones are still strikingly insane.

"Just yell at them, tell them to leave!"

I have to wonder how many of the "No, don't shoot an intruder!" whiny fucks are single men, with no wife or children. If the consequence of inaction ends up being that you, your wife, or your child gets raped, does that change their opinion at all? I have to suspect that a fair number of these people don't have anyone they feel obligated to protect, and since they're hetero males they never suspect that sexual violence might be on the table.

Thanks to that thread though, for making me remember that I have a shotgun at home, but no shells in the house. I will try and buy some ammo in the next week or so.
I saw this thread, "just yell at them" is one of the most idiotic answer that proves just how sheltered and out of touch these retards are.

There's no gun where I live, but I sure as hell will stab or bludgeon the intruder with whatever weapon i have.

These kind of people are probably the ones who think that if you shout "no!", the rapist will stop raping.
 
The troons continued to throw enough of a shit fit that the jannies are going to ban Harry Potter completely:
1681007459291.png

They also banned that Vector guy who agreed Rowling was a Nazi but disagreed on some minor points such as that not all Harry Potter fans want genocide for "Dismissing Concerns of Transphobia" since the cult demands total adherence at all times:
1681007568363.png

Please don't discuss Harry Potter in the library please it makes the troon unsafe:
1681007977231.png

Call a social worker to tell them stealing is bad, mmmkay?
Not acceptable, someone in the thread said you "can't just tell people not to crime" and others are saying that you should just assist the robber (not a "home invader" please) in taking your property.
 
The troons continued to throw enough of a shit fit that the jannies are going to ban Harry Potter completely:
View attachment 5014156

If they ban any and all references to Harry Potter, I don't really see how they can keep the JK Rowling thread going. It's too dependent on mentioning and talking about all her books and characters. Crazy to think that they will have to have a year-round sticky post that says, "Yeah, don't mention this multi-billion dollar franchise or else you will get banned."

They also banned that Vector guy who agreed Rowling was a Nazi but disagreed on some minor points such as that not all Harry Potter fans want genocide for "Dismissing Concerns of Transphobia" since the cult demands total adherence at all times:
View attachment 5014168

Vector played by their rules perfectly, and agreed with them 95%. It just goes to show you that there's really no point in playing by their rules at all. If you upset enough people, they will inevitably find some flimsy excuse to drop the banhammer.
 
If they ban any and all references to Harry Potter, I don't really see how they can keep the JK Rowling thread going. It's too dependent on mentioning and talking about all her books and characters. Crazy to think that they will have to have a year-round sticky post that says, "Yeah, don't mention this multi-billion dollar franchise or else you will get banned."
They've already defended that thread (and similar ones before) as different because it's about marginalized people speaking truth against their oppressors.
 
Basically the copypasta "Getting raped? Just say No! Your rapist legally can not sexually abuse of your body without your consent".
I remember when Nancy Reagan saying "just say no" to drugs seemed like the dumbest thing I'd ever heard. And that even makes more sense because you literally do just have to say no to drugs. They're not going to take themselves.
Vector played by their rules perfectly, and agreed with them 95%. It just goes to show you that there's really no point in playing by their rules at all. If you upset enough people, they will inevitably find some flimsy excuse to drop the banhammer.
They should just actually have a manifesto that tells you what opinions you're allowed to have. And then the members can just cut and paste parts of it at each other with no fear of being banned.

Or just a numbered list.

And then they can yell "45! 45!" "86!" "23!" at each other all day.
 
It makes me angry to think about how many of the posters on Resetera are also sponging off of government disability because they're fat and trans and never want to leave the house or do any work all while thinking they should still have a say on anything outside the four walls of their dungeons.
 
I remember when Nancy Reagan saying "just say no" to drugs seemed like the dumbest thing I'd ever heard. And that even makes more sense because you literally do just have to say no to drugs. They're not going to take themselves.

I always assumed that it was about saying no to friends or others offering you the drugs, but it was still dumb and pointless. The only thing that will happen if you spend an hour telling a group of teenagers to stay away from tobacco, alcohol, or drugs is that they'll want to seek them out to avoid becoming as lame as the idiots putting on the class.

If they really wanted kids off drugs they'd send them on a field trip to skid row and make them clean up the needles, shit, and other mess left by the zombies. Some of the little fuckers might even swear off caffeine after that.

They should just actually have a manifesto that tells you what opinions you're allowed to have. And then the members can just cut and paste parts of it at each other with no fear of being banned.

Or just a numbered list.

And then they can yell "45! 45!" "86!" "23!" at each other all day.

This sounds great in theory, but it's perpetually 1984 over there and the manifesto and the opinions you'd be allowed to have would be ever-changing. We've always sent anyone caught yelling "23" straight to room 101!
 
It makes me angry to think about how many of the posters on Resetera are also sponging off of government disability because they're fat and trans and never want to leave the house or do any work all while thinking they should still have a say on anything outside the four walls of their dungeons.
They often are, though by no means always, Communists, at least in name only.

They obviously have studied neither Communism nor history, because if Communism was ever brought into wherever they lived, they would be the first to go. Back in the day, the Soviets thought of homosexuals as "deviants only possible under capitalism". Even if they weren't, some bureaucrat would do a cost-benefit analysis and quickly realize that keeping housebound trannies and hyper-fat people alive on the teat of government support is unsustainable and propose to either get them "help" or just eliminate them.

In any case, they would be required to do actual work, and those who don't work, if not killed outright, are sent to "reeducation camps".

Fuck, I don't believe in Communism and I'm still more Proletariat than most so-called Communists today.
 
They also banned that Vector guy who agreed Rowling was a Nazi but disagreed on some minor points such as that not all Harry Potter fans want genocide for "Dismissing Concerns of Transphobia" since the cult demands total adherence at all times
It's a dogwhistle, y'all. If you actually agreed with the first 95%, you'd agree with the last 5%. Nobody says ya Hitler is literally hitler, but idk some people are just casual fans of his book.

I'm so hyped for the next installment in the Taysan simp saga. When is he moving to Florida? Astute Kiwis will recall the entertaining tale of when another reeeetard left his husband and the safety of Cali to simp for some twink in NYC who then conned him out of thousands in a single week at the cost of only 2 kisses and no bussy. (Discussed by kiwis here).

This is truly elevated conartistry. I have nothing but admiration for them. Them being able to extract this much money by tolerating a few hugs and pecks on the cheek really makes whores look stupid and lazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Judge Dredd
They should just actually have a manifesto that tells you what opinions you're allowed to have. And then the members can just cut and paste parts of it at each other with no fear of being banned.

Or just a numbered list.

And then they can yell "45! 45!" "86!" "23!" at each other all day.
It's never about rules, it's always about power.
Everyone knows that except those who are gullible enough to think that the mods still have a shred of sincerity in them.
 
Back