NeoGAF & ResetERA - The Hilarious N̶e̶v̶e̶r̶e̶n̶d̶i̶n̶g̶ Splintering "Gaming" Forum Circus

upload_2017-11-18_16-47-42.png

At least now they're just saying that having a debate isn't allowed outright.
 
View attachment 316279
At least now they're just saying that having a debate isn't allowed outright.

I think that only the most retarded and stupid arguments should be barred from threads, for the sake of keeping noise down or to keep topics focused, prevent derailing. however looking at that list they should pick only one or two at the most, but putting a list of all possible rebuttals and saying "nah dont make those points" then they should just fucking say "this topic has been beaten to death and is now verboten.

Thats basically a thread to REE in
 
Only in their warped little bubble can "quoting Lena's admissions of guilt herself" equal "alt-right talking point". Do these people take the time to listen to themselves, and how much they come off sounding like the right-wing lunatics who defended Roy Moore's fondling of underage girls?

Funny how they claim that "it's OK because Lena was only 7 at the time!" but clearly omit the parts where Lena admitting to continuing to touch her sister sexually for 10 more years. Which means that Lena was still sticking her 17 year old fingers in her 11 year old sister's vagina.
:thinking:
See this is why any idea which has an us vs them as a structure is bad. It allows folks to deflect and project.

Sure I stole some gold but at least I'm not a rapist. Sure I raped some folks but what's worse is killing folks. Sure I may have killed some folks but at least I'm not a Nazi/infidel/atheist/commie ect.
 
Last edited:
"I swear i'm not a prude, because i'm only judging games where only the women are sexualized!"

Yeah, because the guys in Metal Gear are totally not sexualized - sweaty, muscular men who are constantly presented shirtless or naked, getting extremely homoerotic with each other. Same with Final Fantasy XV - all the main characters are attractive young men in tight pants with shirts open, fully displaying their muscular chests and six packs. But nope - according to this non-prudish woman, only the ladies get sexualized in those games!

Or maybe...just maybe....you can STFU and play some other games that don't make you feel insecure, sweetie. These games and the existence of tig ol' bitties in them has ZERO negative effect on your life, and I promise you that they are not going to convince little boys to go out and rape women. I've played many a game where I control a character much more physically attractive and fit than me, yet I've managed not to get triggered by it. Funny how that works.

At its core, this always boils down to the same fucking thing, over and over again, into perpetuity:

That these people are so threatened by their own insecurities as to feel threatened by any sexualization whatsoever.

It's no different from every other case of self-appointed fun police we've seen throughout history.
 
"I swear i'm not a prude, because i'm only judging games where only the women are sexualized!"

Yeah, because the guys in Metal Gear are totally not sexualized - sweaty, muscular men who are constantly presented shirtless or naked, getting extremely homoerotic with each other. Same with Final Fantasy XV - all the main characters are attractive young men in tight pants with shirts open, fully displaying their muscular chests and six packs. But nope - according to this non-prudish woman, only the ladies get sexualized in those games!

Or maybe...just maybe....you can STFU and play some other games that don't make you feel insecure, sweetie. These games and the existence of tig ol' bitties in them has ZERO negative effect on your life, and I promise you that they are not going to convince little boys to go out and rape women. I've played many a game where I control a character much more physically attractive and fit than me, yet I've managed not to get triggered by it. Funny how that works.

I wonder what they'd think of the Selous Scouts.

scouts1.jpg
scouting4danger_k.jpg
 
At its core, this always boils down to the same fucking thing, over and over again, into perpetuity:

That these people are so threatened by their own insecurities as to feel threatened by any sexualization whatsoever.

It's no different from every other case of self-appointed fun police we've seen throughout history.
Such as?
 
"Doom will make your children devil worshippers"
"D&D is literally made by Satan and if you play it you are actually a witch"
"GTA is turning children in to school shooters"
"DOA beach volleyball poisons young male minds" etc
It's strange though how in the past few years the moral watchdogs of society have done a complete 180 from being intensely conservative fundamentalists to far-left progressives. I wonder if it's at all a product of the vacuum that's been left since the right-wing watchdogs have pretty much disappeared in the past few decades.
 
View attachment 316279
At least now they're just saying that having a debate isn't allowed outright.

"Censorship is bad." Yes it is. But criticism isn't censorship.

I'm not even going to debate how idiotic this point is even at face value, I just want to say that banning people or threatening to do so in case they disagree with the "criticism" presented is the definition of censorship. I mean, this is so blatant, this is so in your face ironic that I shudder to think the kind of mongoloid that would, as a moderator no less, read it again before posting and think to him/her/itself "yeah this is some good stuff".
 
It's strange though how in the past few years the moral watchdogs of society have done a complete 180 from being intensely conservative fundamentalists to far-left progressives. I wonder if it's at all a product of the vacuum that's been left since the right-wing watchdogs have pretty much disappeared in the past few decades.
The right wing morality police still exist but people as a whole take them way less seriously than they used to, plus I'm sure they also did a fair bit of eating their own and driving away people in their ranks which has helped thin their numbers a good bit. SJWs almost certainly have the same future ahead.

BTW anyone want to make any bets on how long REEEEsetera lasts before it inevitably collapses on itself? I'm gonna be generous and give it a year and a half.
 
BTW anyone want to make any bets on how long REEEEsetera lasts before it inevitably collapses on itself? I'm gonna be generous and give it a year and a half.

Depends on whether or not the mods, or preferably the admins, have any shit they'd rather not come out into the open.

Otherwise, it will just continue its downward spiral into irrelevancy. More of a slow death rather than a collapse.

upload_2017-11-19_1-27-59.png


>trans person gets banned for being "transphobic"
:story:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

She sexually assaulted her little sister and then wrote about it in a book she published for money. And now she's under fire for going from "girls don't lie about rape" to "sometimes girls lie about rape" after her co-worker got accused and then having to apologize for it after getting called out. She's so completely repulsive and retarded that all but the most diehard crazies have bailed on her fat ass.

Of course if there's one thing NeoFag is filled with...
 
The right wing morality police still exist but people as a whole take them way less seriously than they used to, plus I'm sure they also did a fair bit of eating their own and driving away people in their ranks which has helped thin their numbers a good bit. SJWs almost certainly have the same future ahead.


The moral majority police are alot like the SJW in that its a mix of two groups those that are true believers/useful idoits and their leadership/wanna be leadership. They functioned much better before the leveling of media when you could get parents and groups to attack tv networks, publishers, record labels, basically the gatekeepers of pop culture and media.

I m old enough to remember how the evils of porn would destroy our society etc, then the internet happened and well it wasnt porn that took down western culture.

One difference I see is that the conservatives wanted to "preserve" and "protect" moral purity they took a view that the culture was already good and under attack from outside influences seeking to corrupt it. Like that black music etc.

The SJW see the status qo as corrupt and problematic in need of change and they are the vanguard etc. whats weird is while the moral majority would pressure record labels and tv/movie studios while happily giving sermons and debates on the evil of lacking morality. The SJW tend to target individuals shrink away from debate or challenges.
 
A thread about literal cattle auction style human slave sales in Libya turns into a "US is worse" thread. https://archive.is/0KiFB

TBH I was surprised that some of the responses were reasonable. And that this guy apparently didn't get banned...(yet?)

eisHgDA.png


Especially that last line. I wonder how they'd answer it, if forced to?
 
Back