Its still in progress. I’ll have to walk thru the minting process with the artist and transfer to the client. Keeping most of the money just as USD and the transaction thru wire transfers. I’ll just have the artist transfer it to the clients wallet. Ugh, but first gotta teach them both about crypto wallets.
Wait, so the client commissioned a work and now he's pretending to be the one that made it?
No, not at all. He commissioned it. The artist is creating it. I’m the middle man connecting them and handling the work becoming an NFT. The work will be attributed to the creator, but the client will own it. There will also be a physical piece to accompany the digital NFT as well.
How many NFTs are tied to a physical item? most I seen were just a jpg or an mp4
Not many, but if you look thru what's coming up at Christie's/Sotheby's you'll see some where it's a digital file AND a physical artwork. Mainstream collectors need something physical to own, otherwise they don't get it or feel comfortable.
I recall that meme artist banksky selling an original+NFT then burning the original so the NFT would go up in value or something
You luck out and stumble in at the right time or you network. Successful artists come out of communities. It’s often about who you know and who they know. Talent is part of it but much less than they’d like to admit. For NFTs keep in mind huge sales prices are more often than not are being paid by the crypto rich. It’s another way to legitimize the currency. It’s not just about the art.
They aren't a jpg or mp4. Copyright ownership is not transferred through the sale of an NFT. You're buying a link embedded in a blockchain.
How are you going to make money when you don't even know how they work? You don't get the jpeg, you get a link. If the copyright owner decided to remove the image from the linked location, you now own a link to a 404.
She's a high end escort that "DJs" to get paid.
I consider everything they've done to be... sincerely participating in the grift, but also being honest about it. They tried to become an instagram influencer then made a video about it, they tried to make merch and made a video about it... So yeah I hope they try to make an actually successful NFT and then make a video about it. They're basically documentarians of internet grift bubbles.
They rose to popularity based on doing call out videos on more popular YouTubers. That's textbook grifting.
"The Industrial Revolution and its consequences"...
what is it about NFTs and crypto that make these people base their entire identity around them? Furries I can sorta understand, weebs too, but fucking monopoly money and jpegs? Most of these people exclusively tweet about how much they've made/lost in the last 60 seconds, have .eth in their name, have an avatar that looks like half of the subjects of this forum spent 5 minutes in paint, or a mix of all three.
cryptos only survive because of shilling. they know this, maybe even subconsciously
