NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) - Files as crypto currency

I'm still not stupid enough to fall for all this but I must admit it's getting very amusing.

SmartSelect_20211221-201409_Brave.jpg
 
a lawyer take on NFT
talk of the sad way foward of gaming moments turned into NFTS.
 
how the fuck is this real
No idea but here's the set and current bids:

SmartSelect_20211222-100215_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100224_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100232_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100240_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100248_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100303_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100312_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100256_Brave.jpgSmartSelect_20211222-100319_Brave.jpg

You know when you were young and you wondered how the hell the boomers around you couldn't work the most basic of modern tech or keep up with what was going on with the young people? Yeah, I understand the other side of that one now.
 
Assuming they're either not falling for an even more retarded pyramid scheme or digging in the ruins of the modern world to find insects to eat for the calories needed to survive.
 
the furry artiest have done their magic again .
found around about way to dmca google to get their art taken down.
1640235328816.png

1640235401964.png

1640235428527.png

...........
can't beat them join them
1640235587034.png

1640235623032.png

............
why is this becoming a problem enter the (insert country here) Bot still art work claim to be the person & make NFT.
1640235740795.png

so yes in theory people could make a fake NULL account on x website sell post or image people avatar on NFT site .
still law in the air if NULL own the post because on his website which nft linked to or person who made the post.
 
Last edited:
The first time I heard about NFTs I deemed the concept stupid and stopped paying attention. Now I've heard that Ubisoft is considering bringing NFTs into their games, which is also stupid.
The concept still sounds very, very stupid. But maybe I'm missing something. If someone buys one of those NFTs. It's an image and they become the new owner of that image. And then someone goes on to post the same image in their Youtube video or shares it on other social media platforms. Could the owner of that NFT sue those people? Or try to get them to remove those images? Maybe that's the appeal to some people? They buy certain images and then go on to sue everyone, who uses them. I don't know how it works with creative-commons-licenses, where you can use other peoples work, if you use it for commentary or change it enough.
 
Now I've heard that Ubisoft is considering bringing NFTs into their games, which is also stupid.

Crypto is stupid (i say this as someone whose life savings are in crypto) and the art world is stupid so of course the combination of the two would be a cloud-piercing olympus of stupidity.

Now I've heard that Ubisoft is considering bringing NFTs into their games, which is also stupid... But maybe I'm missing something.
NFTs are just digital assets, so the idea of using NFTs to manage video game "property" is maybe the least-stupid implementation of the idea i've encountered so far. It would mean the weird swirly-colored custom gun that you grind for in Vanguard is an NFT and that's how it's tracked across different platforms-- like you could then also use it in Warzone and/or sell it to another player.

don't get hung up on "NFTs are images," that's just been the most profitable/money-laundering-friendly use case 'til now.
 
The first time I heard about NFTs I deemed the concept stupid and stopped paying attention. Now I've heard that Ubisoft is considering bringing NFTs into their games, which is also stupid.
The concept still sounds very, very stupid. But maybe I'm missing something. If someone buys one of those NFTs. It's an image and they become the new owner of that image. And then someone goes on to post the same image in their Youtube video or shares it on other social media platforms. Could the owner of that NFT sue those people? Or try to get them to remove those images? Maybe that's the appeal to some people? They buy certain images and then go on to sue everyone, who uses them. I don't know how it works with creative-commons-licenses, where you can use other peoples work, if you use it for commentary or change it enough.
Read the first page of this thread.
Yes, in theory, but this has yet to be tried in court and at any rate it's likely someone who bought (the rights to) a single monkey PNG doesn't have the resources to launch an IP lawsuit anyway. But if theory works out there's potential that the same idea of blockchain contracts can be applied to more concretely-valuable things like real estate, vehicles, and non-digital fine art.
 
NFTs are just digital assets, so the idea of using NFTs to manage video game "property" is maybe the least-stupid implementation of the idea i've encountered so far. It would mean the weird swirly-colored custom gun that you grind for in Vanguard is an NFT and that's how it's tracked across different platforms-- like you could then also use it in Warzone and/or sell it to another player.
a video game is a private product of a company
the assets to be utilized in that game are prerogative of that company alone
who owns what, the trade and everything else are hosted on the private servers of that company.
those servers already maintain a database of who owns what
what new innovation are you expecting with nfts? cross publisher skins?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NSJAP and Rezza
so what can you put into a NFT? can you sell evidence for them killing JFK? or just flashing images that will make Kurt Tentacle Eichenwal fshit himself on the floor while his family has to watch flashing hentai images?
 
You know when you were young and you wondered how the hell the boomers around you couldn't work the most basic of modern tech or keep up with what was going on with the young people? Yeah, I understand the other side of that one now.
I dunno man this seems like an example where neither the biggest proponents nor detractors have a fucking clue what they actually are.

Nerd things are too complicated so we've apparently settled into a weird middle of the pool which is lukewarm from both the IQs and all the retards pissing back and forth on one another, where everyone just pretends they're jpegs because that's easier to understand.
New recursively retarded frontiers of stupidity are being explored in front of our eyes by those who proceed to argue/gloat about the jpegs that they aren't, to whom it hasn't occurred that them being jpegs not making sense might be a clue of some kind as to whether or not they are jpegs.

Our species is a dead end, nuke the world.
 
Back