Plagued Nice Guys

[Krieger]

For all the horrible experiences with nice guys, they are like the basic tier chauvanists. At least they are pretty much stupidly honest of what they think of women "Fuck I was friendzoned, I treated you like a human being and didn't get the reward of pussy at the end!" so basically they don't think women of as human, unless they have a chance to bang. And they are obvious about it.

They are way easier to deal with than the predator types that do the same thing as the guy above, but instead of outright asking and losing their shit, they'll stick around, pretend to be your friend, then slip something into your food/drink one night, or straight up sexually assault you when they get the perfect opportunity.

I'd take a million raging incels over a sexual predator.

Sexual predators are assuredly leagues more dangerous. They're insanely harmful individuals that can easily hide themselves before springing their real personalities and actions on an unsuspecting victim. Incels, even without comparing them to predators, are limp and openly admitting their mindset so you can easily avoid them. Between the two, I agree - I rather deal with the incels since at least they're easier to avoid and aren't at risk of killing anyone. Usually.

 

[Monika H.]

And we reached 200 pages of Nice Guys, gentlemen's, m'ladies and clingy roleplays!!!
Let's break out the champagne and toast at all the laughs, the cringe and discussions this thread gave us!
Not many believed in this thread when it started, but look where it got almost 3 years later, and how much content got shared!!

 

[Eshettar]

I never dreamed I'd say this but...your good health, Herr Himmler!

 

[LtCucumber]

And we reached 200 pages of Nice Guys, gentlemen's, m'ladies and clingy roleplays!!!
Let's break out the champagne and toast at all the laughs, the cringe and discussions this thread gave us!
Not many believed in this thread when it started, but look where it got almost 3 years later, and how much content got shared!!
View attachment 523316

I'm so proud to be a part of this... Anyway enjoy some garden variety cringe in celebration

Spoiler: girls, stop doing the 'decent human' thing of smiling if you don't want to fuck me

This, m'ladies and gentledicks, is from an article written about incels that you can read here if you feel so inclined.

Spoiler: WAHMEN ARE THE PROBLEM HERE

Spoiler: yeah no i dont like your personality' 'lol but u work at chipotle and i'm going somewhere in life.... call me back

 

[Vorhtbame]

Spoiler: WAHMEN ARE THE PROBLEM HERE

I hate that "axiom". It's patently untrue, even when interpreted correctly--i.e., 20% of men are broadly appealing to women, except women with tastes that differ. Women are actually less picky about looks than men are; where we get demanding is actually education level.

And the standard interpretation of the proposition--80% of men are celibate, with 80% of women being in harems--simply isn't so. All you have to do to prove that is leave the basement and meet people who aren't incels.

Spoiler: yeah no i dont like your personality' 'lol but u work at chipotle and i'm going somewhere in life.... call me back

How to tell someone that you've been pretending to be someone you're not, and the real you is the asshole who insulted her: "I didn't mean to get out of character like that"

 

[DrJonesHat]

I skimmed one of those PUA books on the grounds of knowing my enemy, and that guy's approach is straight out of it. "Girls are all secretly attracted to assholes, so be an asshole, and you'll be drowning in pussy." Back in the real world, that's not true and the only women that will work on are the ones who have low self-esteem and think they don't deserve better. So not only are you being an asshole, you're taking advantage of someone with emotional problems, so you're an utter bastard at that point.

 

[Vorhtbame]

I skimmed one of those PUA books on the grounds of knowing my enemy, and that guy's approach is straight out of it. "Girls are all secretly attracted to assholes, so be an asshole, and you'll be drowning in pussy." Back in the real world, that's not true and the only women that will work on are the ones who have low self-esteem and think they don't deserve better. So not only are you being an asshole, you're taking advantage of someone with emotional problems, so you're an utter bastard at that point.

Funny thing is, though, they believe that those emotional problems are 100% normal, and that any woman who doesn't fall for their bullshit is defective. It's like an unconscious sour-grapes phenomenon.

 

[The Valeyard]

Nice Guy: I want to creampie you so bad
Girl: That's creepy af
Nice Guy: How? It's dessert

 

[Rabbit without a hat]

That's a rookie start. A true gentleman starts off with "Do you like creampies?" *Sweats nervously as I wait for response*

 

[Alec Benson Leary]

Nice Guy: I want to creampie you so bad
Girl: That's creepy af
Nice Guy: How? It's dessert

View attachment 524705

Oh come on, she's being sensitive, anyone can make an innocent mistake about creampies:

 

[laoyang]

I might be being exceptional, but surely the point of the song, and indeed the point of view of the song, is Sting writing it about creeping on his ex wife or something?

https://listverse.com/2010/06/14/top-10-misinterpreted-song-meanings/

Yes, yes it was.

I could've sworn I read somewhere that Every Breathe You Take is about government surveillance. More you know I guess.

 

[TowinKarz]

I'm just amazed they don't get that an anger issue may be one of the major things that women don't like about them.... people tend to notice when you go from flowery prose to "Fuck you cunt" in the span of one sentence, and not a whiff of satire is detected..... that isn't normal behavior from anyone.

 

[DrJonesHat]

I'm just amazed they don't get that an anger issue may be one of the major things that women don't like about them.... people tend to notice when you go from flowery prose to "Fuck you cunt" in the span of one sentence, and not a whiff of satire is detected..... that isn't normal behavior from anyone.

Quite. They're showing, without prompting, that if they aren't obeyed instantly, they become hostile and possibly violent.

 

[Bunny Tracks]

Cross-posting from the other thread about this here, it turns out that the reason that the teen who had repeatedly stabbed a girl during an assembly was because-surprise, surprise-she only liked him as a friend. Now there's a group calling for a bill to be passed named "Lauren's Law" which create a mandatory class that would teach "proper consent and romantic communication skills".

 

[LtCucumber]

Cross-posting from the other thread about this here, it turns out that the reason that the teen who had repeatedly stabbed a girl during an assembly was because-surprise, surprise-she only liked him as a friend. Now there's a group calling for a bill to be passed named "Lauren's Law" which create a mandatory class that would teach "proper consent and romantic communication skills".

Jesus christ they're evolving from simply stalking and breaking into girls cars. Honestly I didn't think I'd ever have to say this but it's actually pretty dangerous when people are not told the meaning of the word "no" or the importance of just taking rejection like a fucking adult. That coupled with never telling a child no/giving them what they want with no questions, could probably lead to entitlement complexes that could cause exactly that.

I mean i think that teaching people the importance of consent at an earlyish age isn't a bad idea- especially with raging hormones in the mix- god only knows how much angsty teenage drama there is about relationships in school. Put it this way, :powerlevel:some kid i went to school with had a 'girlfriend' at about age 10, and 'dated' another girl at the same time bc she gave him a valentine's day card (lmao):powerlevel:- there are some kids that are growing up kinda fast about things and put a big emphasis on relationships, like i said, raging hormones and puberty makes it a lot worse, and rejection feels like the end of the world to a lot of people in their early-to-mid teenage years.

 

[TowinKarz]

Such a class would be totally ineffective at stopping the behavior, noble intentions aside, it's useless because the Eliot Rodgers and Stabby McStabersons of the world are they way they are NOT because they don't know better, but because they don't care about anyone but themselves and that cannot be untaught, IMHO. It's as stupid an idea as "Teach boys not to rape" class.

People don't rape out of ignorance it's wrong, the just don't fucking care who gets hurt as long as they get what they want.... and people don't stab others out of ignorance that it's wrong, or that it hurts, they do it because they cannot channel their rage, and no amount of feel-good classes are going to change that.

This idea that all negative behaviors are social constructs that simply need to be unlearned is poisonous to actual solutions, like "Tell a teacher and give the kid detention, he won't "Lean" why it's wrong, but he'll hopefully at least stop because he'd rather not be in detention"

 

[Strange Looking Dog]

Such a class would be totally ineffective at stopping the behavior, noble intentions aside, it's useless because the Eliot Rodgers and Stabby McStabersons of the world are they way they are NOT because they don't know better, but because they don't care about anyone but themselves and that cannot be untaught, IMHO. It's as stupid an idea as "Teach boys not to rape" class.

People don't rape out of ignorance it's wrong, the just don't fucking care who gets hurt as long as they get what they want.... and people don't stab others out of ignorance that it's wrong, or that it hurts, they do it because they cannot channel their rage, and no amount of feel-good classes are going to change that.

This idea that all negative behaviors are social constructs that simply need to be unlearned is poisonous to actual solutions, like "Tell a teacher and give the kid detention, he won't "Lean" why it's wrong, but he'll hopefully at least stop because he'd rather not be in detention"

Broke; Teach rapists not to rape

Woke; Teach bears not to maul

Transcendent; Teach lightning not to strike


Everything's a social construct apparently. Good thing too, I'll save tons on food once I teach myself not to starve

 

[0 0]

Cross-posting from the other thread about this here, it turns out that the reason that the teen who had repeatedly stabbed a girl during an assembly was because-surprise, surprise-she only liked him as a friend. Now there's a group calling for a bill to be passed named "Lauren's Law" which create a mandatory class that would teach "proper consent and romantic communication skills".

Okay, call me nuts, but I think a class that portrays the idea of "proper consent and romantic communication skills" as more valuable than it already is would throw these people into an even bigger violent fit when they get turned down by a woman that thought they were properly courting, no? This proposed class would be a waste of time for anyone else, so it's pretty dire when it immediately fails to appeal to its target demographic.

 

[ZeCommissar]

Just implement Chris's idea of a highschool dating tutorial class.

Such a class will obviously make all the loveless autists that can't make eye contact become Chad Casanovas in one semester.

 

[Butta Face Lopez]

OR we could just teach women to not be UNGRATEFUL CUNTS and give the nice guys a chance instead of always going for violent asshole Chads