Plagued Nice Guys

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
And that guy was utterly shocked that people thought he was the creep, particularly when he asked if he could get a restraining order against her bf on her behalf.

The entire situation reached a point where you were forced to throw your hands up in exasperation and wonder why. Why he continued posting about it at all when he should have known better than to expect sympathy from this crowd. Early on, he kept altering the details of the story to try and make himself look like the hero. But since it was the same place he'd posted the original version of it in, that tactic proved about as effective as donning a fake mustache to try and sneak back into a night club he'd been thrown out of. Without even bothering to get out of the bouncer's sight before he whipped it out of his pocket.

I'd wonder how somebody as deranged as this dude got a job like that in the first place. But then I remember a man known as Richard Farley who seemed perfectly respectable until new hireling Laura Black was introduced to him and the terror began...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sekirodiealot
I feel really out of the loop here. Anyone got a link to the story or anything? I need to see this


A commenter saved his original post for posterity (as he has since deleted it and a number of other posts/comments):

755481

755483
 
Since the post got deleted, the legal advice thread was him asking if he could file a restraining order against the boyfriend on her behalf.

I mean, he was right that she needs a restraining order on a dude...

Edit: @Viridian had it covered, I’m dumb
 
Last edited:

A commenter saved his original post for posterity (as he has since deleted it and a number of other posts/comments):

View attachment 755481
View attachment 755483





Ow. Ow. Ooooowwwww.

Reading the original post in its raw unedited form never fails to make my eyes bleed. It's like paragraphs are just like respecting other people's boundaries as far as this guy's concerned. Something for other people to worry about.

Imagine Jennifer checking her phone and discovering the blitzkrieg of texts it had been assaulted with as she lay in her loved one's naked embrace. Though she'd been far more patient than other less tolerant folks would have in her position, that had to be the moment she decided enough was enough and it was time to put her foot down once and for all.

Or put her foot up Menumessage's ass.
 
Keep in mind, there was absolutely NO proof the bf was abusive. She called her bf to come pick her up because menumessages was behaving in a bizarre manner at the company event (it wasn't a big fancy ball like menumessages tried to portray it, it was just a get-together). I think Jennifer at one point showed up to torpedo his claims.
 

A commenter saved his original post for posterity (as he has since deleted it and a number of other posts/comments):

View attachment 755481
View attachment 755483
"why would he have a problem with someone taking her to an event", says the guy who literally referred to her as his 'date' :story:
The red flags are literally only red flags to you if you're interested in dating someone and you don't like their boyfriend/girlfriend. He's trying to say he's not interested in a relationship, but let's be real, he's saying that so his white knighting "you deserve better" (before inevitably saying she should be with him instead of her "asshole" boyfriend) bs doesn't attract as much negativity as it should do. Also she's 24 and dating someone her age. He's 32 and trying to white knight her into his pants 🤮:heart-empty:

This shit is just reminding me of the white knighting situation I had recently. It's a boatload of powerleveling shit but the boyfriend and I had a good laugh about it. I'll probably go into it in a later post so this one isn't long as fuck.
 
Last edited:
"why would he have a problem with someone taking her to an event", says the guy who literally referred to her as his 'date' :story:
The red flags are literally only red flags to you if you're interested in dating someone and you don't like their boyfriend/girlfriend. He's trying to say he's not interested in a relationship, but let's be real, he's saying that so his white knighting "you deserve better" (before inevitably saying she should be with him instead of her "asshole" boyfriend) bs doesn't attract as much negativity as it should do. Also she's 24 and dating someone her age. He's 32 and trying to white knight her into his pants 🤮:heart-empty:

This shit is just reminding me of the white knighting situation I had recently. It's a boatload of powerleveling shit but the boyfriend and I had a good laugh about it. I'll probably go into it in a later post so this one isn't long as fuck.
Just tweak things so the innocent (and guilty-as-fuck) aren't doxed.
 
Menumessages just might be the greatest ever example of a trait I've observed in many of these Nice Guys.

And this trait is a refusal to be honest about his intentions toward the woman he's taken such a shine to. Maybe he was terrified that she'd respond with a gentle but unmistakably clear "Awww, that's so sweet. Make no mistake that nothing is ever going to happen between you and I. But still, it's sweet." or maybe there were rules within the organisation forbidding employees from dating. But what's certain beyond belief is that he had feelings for Jennifer. When this accusation was thrown at him fast and thick, he'd hotly deny it but come on. The profuse gushing over how special and pretty she was spoke more volumes than even Johnny 5 would be able to finish reading before his circuits rusted over.

Rather than take the chance of her rejecting him outright, he held his tongue and slyly pretended to be her friend, holding out hope that there would come a day when she'd finally open her eyes and see what a prince had been right in front of her all along.

Then reality smashed his fantasy to smithereens because what happened instead is that there came a day when she mentioned she had a boyfriend.

And as we know, it was all downhill from there...
 
Last edited:
Rather than take the chance of her rejecting him outright, he held his tongue and slyly pretended to be her friend, holding out hope that there would come a day when she'd finally open her eyes and see what a prince had been right in front of her all along.

Then reality smashed his fantasy to smithereens because what happened instead is that there came a day when she mentioned she had a boyfriend.

It's funny that he did comment on her attractive appearance and how he took a liking to her personally, but then defends his intentions in all caps that he's NOT INTERESTED ROMANTICALLY. If that's so, why did he feel like trust was betrayed that she didn't disclose that she herself was romantically involved on her own with somebody else? He wasn't upset that she was in an "abusive relationship," he was upset that he wasn't immediately informed that she wasn't single. There's no reason for this guy to be upset that she's got a boyfriend. Then he invents an abusive relationship suspicion that he uses anything at all to back it up with, and begins his own emotional abuse to try and shame her into becoming single. If she were single, he might've tried to get her fired so he can date her.
 
It's funny that he did comment on her attractive appearance and how he took a liking to her personally, but then defends his intentions in all caps that he's NOT INTERESTED ROMANTICALLY. If that's so, why did he feel like trust was betrayed that she didn't disclose that she herself was romantically involved on her own with somebody else? He wasn't upset that she was in an "abusive relationship," he was upset that he wasn't immediately informed that she wasn't single. There's no reason for this guy to be upset that she's got a boyfriend. Then he invents an abusive relationship suspicion that he uses anything at all to back it up with, and begins his own emotional abuse to try and shame her into becoming single. If she were single, he might've tried to get her fired so he can date her.
You know he'd also have been upset if she said at the start that she has a boyfriend. He'd decide she was being sexist or narcissistic for assuming he wanted her.

Women can't win with guys like him. We're either being shitty for trying to head this bullshit off at the pass, or we're leading them on if we don't immediately say we're taken/not interested.
 
If she were single, he might've tried to get her fired so he can date her.

I wouldn't put it past him.

When the Redditors pointed out that he'd changed his story after the original version got torn to shreds, he tried to duck their accusations by invoking Rule 4 of the community: No Witch Hunts. An ironic twist when you keep in mind that not only was he accusing a fellow he didn't even know of abusing women, he himself seemed to have forgotten the number one rule: Be Respectful.

A man who either demands that the rules be followed or throws them out the window depending on which happens to suit his ego is hardly someone who deserves to have authority over others, I'd say.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Viridian
The whole basis for his belief the boyfriend was abusive was that she left the party (not a ball) with him early after MM was being creepy, and MM was too oblivious to see that he was the cause, so he concluded her boyfriend was abusing her and didn't want her hanging around him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Viridian
The whole basis for his belief the boyfriend was abusive was that she left the party (not a ball) with him early after MM was being creepy, and MM was too oblivious to see that he was the cause, so he concluded her boyfriend was abusing her and didn't want her hanging around him.
Well it was also that she didn't text him back when he sent a bunch of texts about how worried he was about her "getting home safe"

Cause clearly she was dying to text him back but the evil boyfriend prevented it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spedestrian
Back