- Joined
- Aug 6, 2024
Btw is it a requirement from Todd Howard that he has to jerk himself off during a presentation? This dude just loves to hear himself talk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Am I missing out big?
No not really. Again my Switch has mostly been a dust magnet since last year.I've played a Switch, but not very often.
While I do think the Switch 2 is too expensive, I still think it's going to sell 70-80 million units. It's not going to be anywhere the monumental failure Wii U was. It'll be more of a DS -> 3DS thing in terms of sales.I know that the Switch 2 is currently selling well, but I can see the potential for what happened to the Wii U repeating itself, especially after the partner showcase today. It reminded me of that interview Reggie did with Geoff Keighley where Geoff questioned why someone would play a worse version of a game they already played a few years ago. Portability isn't really a novel concept today as there are many more systems today that are portable than back in 2017.
I feel like Switch has a lot of utility if you know how to buy games. I have a pretty big collection of games I already had for other systems like Red Dead Redemption, Titan quest, Skyrim and Borderlands. A lot of these third party games get marked down after a year or so and you can get them used for like $20. I think buying any of those games brand new when they launched would have been retarded, but for $20 it's kind of worth it because sometimes you just want to play Skyrim in bed.Am I missing out big? I haven't owned a Nintendo console since the Wii.
Something happened. I stopped playing consoles as much to begin with and fell behind, my most recent is a PS4 I got.
I've played a Switch, but not very often.
I guess I'm not really focusing on how it sells, but more of who will buy the ports? I know die hard nintendo fans will, but so far Nintendo is making the mistake of relying on years old 3rd party ports. Bringing Wii U games to the Switch made sense as it introduced those games to a wider audience, but they can't pull that same trick twice. Even the Switch 2 games we've received have obviously been Switch 1 games that were delayed and shelved until the Switch 2 was released, with maybe the exception of Kirby Air Riders. Eventually people will question why they have it in the first place. I know some people who did that even with the Switch. The real money is in the games, not the consoles, it's the razor and blades business model. And if all you're seeing is old games that run worse, that you're being asked to buy again, I don't see the appealWhile I do think the Switch 2 is too expensive, I still think it's going to sell 70-80 million units. It's not going to be anywhere the monumental failure Wii U was. It'll be more of a DS -> 3DS thing in terms of sales.
Toddslop notwithstanding, most of these ports are way more recent (1-2 years old) than the ones you'd typically get only a single year ago in the switch era (5-6 years old). A good chunk of them, capcom especially, are launching day 1 on switch 2. Some of the ports, most notably the Digimon one, actually run BETTER than the ps5 version, 60fps on switch 2 while it's locked to 30fps on ps5. Most of these things are pretty inconsequential, but taken together paint a picture of a paradigm shift going on right now.I guess I'm not really focusing on how it sells, but more of who will buy the ports? I know die hard nintendo fans will, but so far Nintendo is making the mistake of relying on years old 3rd party ports. Bringing Wii U games to the Switch made sense as it introduced those games to a wider audience, but they can't pull that same trick twice. Even the Switch 2 games we've received have obviously been Switch 1 games that were delayed and shelved until the Switch 2 was released, with maybe the exception of Kirby Air Riders. Eventually people will question why they have it in the first place. I know some people who did that even with the Switch. The real money is in the games, not the consoles, it's the razor and blades business model. And if all you're seeing is old games that run worse, that you're being asked to buy again, I don't see the appeal
I use mine to play Skyrim when I take the train to and from work. It's perfect for public transit commute for older game replays, and is about the only free time I have to play games anymore.sometimes you just want to play Skyrim in bed.
The PS5 version of Time Stranger is getting a patch for 60fps too. It was buried in the news following the direct so it's not exactly widespread information.Toddslop notwithstanding, most of these ports are way more recent (1-2 years old) than the ones you'd typically get only a single year ago in the switch era (5-6 years old). A good chunk of them, capcom especially, are launching day 1 on switch 2. Some of the ports, most notably the Digimon one, actually run BETTER than the ps5 version, 60fps on switch 2 while it's locked to 30fps on ps5. Most of these things are pretty inconsequential, but taken together paint a picture of a paradigm shift going on right now.
Yes. He's built his story up as "the chess club guy took over a game company with his epic brain" and by god everybody's gonna fuckin' hear it.This dude just loves to hear himself talk.
As part of today’s Nintendo Direct Partner Showcase, Hamster announced a new Console Archives line of emulated classics available for download starting today on the Switch 2 and next week on the PlayStation 5 (sorry, Xbox and OG Switch fans). So far that lineup only includes the original PlayStation snowboarding title Cool Boarders for $12 and the NES action platformer Ninja Gaiden II: The Dark Sword of Chaos for $8, but Hamster promises more obscure games, including Doraemon and Sonic Wings Special, will be available in the future.
I wonder how many Nintendo "classics" already presently available on one or more of the existing virtual consoles will mysteriously disappear from those stores only to reappear on this new one with fresh coats of paint (or an extra word or two in the title) for $9.99 plus tax once this new virtual console is available?
Virtual console doesn't exist anymore. You literally cannot buy old Nintendo games from Nintendo. They are only available via subscription.I wonder how many Nintendo "classics" already presently available on one or more of the existing virtual consoles will mysteriously disappear from those stores only to reappear on this new one with fresh coats of paint (or an extra word or two in the title) for $9.99 plus tax once this new virtual console is available?
This isn't a storefront nor handled by Nintendo. People comparing it to the Virtual Console are embellishing a bit.I wonder how many Nintendo "classics" already presently available on one or more of the existing virtual consoles will mysteriously disappear from those stores only to reappear on this new one with fresh coats of paint (or an extra word or two in the title) for $9.99 plus tax once this new virtual console is available?
JFC how many separate storefronts masquerading as "virtual consoles" does one platform need?
I'm all for complaining about nso, and especially the absolute drip feed of games, but come the fuck on.Being able to buy Mario World or Super Metroid for $10 would be an improvement over the current situation imo.
I'm not saying I'd personally buy Mario World for $10 at this point. I'm saying I would rather drop a one time $50-60 one and done to buy a handful of games I want to play in perpetuity than have an annual subscription. I think virtual console was a better system than NSO for old games. I bought virtual console games on 3DS well over a decade ago, and I can still pick up my 3DS and play them anytime with no active subscription, no Internet connection, etc. They're just there on my system ready to play until it breaks.I'm all for complaining about nso, and especially the absolute drip feed of games, but come the fuck on.
This is flawed too. If you own nothing, then companies can sell you what basically amounts to a subscription fee, in perpetuity, for the rest of your life. Please buy these decade-old games again. Please buy them over, and over, and over. Don’t archive it yourself. Don’t make your own copies. Buy ours! Give US money! Which would be fine....if you couldn't get the same experience, if not an infinitely better one, elsewhere. If you haven't built up a physical gaming collection, or lack the physical space, or the money, the solution is obvious--what platform can give you everything, ALL the games, ALL the rare stuff, and ONLY what you want?I'm not saying I'd personally buy Mario World for $10 at this point. I'm saying I would rather drop a one time $50-60 one and done to buy a handful of games I want to play in perpetuity than have an annual subscription. I think virtual console was a better system than NSO for old games.
I don't disagree. I don't even have an online account on my personal Switch and if it doesn't come out on a physical cart I just don't play it. However, in terms of official options to play old games, I think being able to buy a perpetual one-time license to be able to play Mario World is better than having to have some kind of active subscription to play Mario World.This is flawed too. If you own nothing, then companies can sell you what basically amounts to a subscription fee, in perpetuity, for the rest of your life. Please buy these decade-old games again. Please buy them over, and over, and over. Don’t archive it yourself. Don’t make your own copies. Buy ours! Give US money! Which would be fine....if you couldn't get the same experience, if not an infinitely better one, elsewhere. If you haven't built up a physical gaming collection, or lack the physical space, or the money, the solution is obvious--what platform can give you everything, ALL the games, ALL the rare stuff, and ONLY what you want?
View attachment 8526005