NY judge denies Defendant second amendment. - Guess what color the judge is.

[Milkshake Sniffer]

That "the 2nd amendment doesn't exist here" line should be grounds for a mistrial at least.

The appeal should be successful. Higher courts don't like lower judges saying the Bill of Rights doesn't exist in their courtroom.

How the fuck is a judge actually able to say this? You can't dismiss the damn Bill of Rights like it holds no meaning! I could see a retard in a school debate getting away with making such nonsense statements but for a judge to actually say this and NOT get chastised for it is terrifying.

Saying "The 2nd amendment doesn't apply to this courtroom" is like saying "The constitution doesn't apply to this courtroom" and not only has no legal basis, but is illegal.

Judicial immunity, they don't give a fuck, at worst the case will get transferred to another judge.

I get that there have always been issues with immunity for state actors such as judges. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" goes back a couple of millennia. But.... at what point does a judge's actions cross the line of no longer being a judge and being susceptible to actual civil and criminal sanctions? If explicitly rejecting the Constitution (which I'm assuming she took an oath to comply with) doesn't cross that line what would? Declaring the defendant guilty without the jury, sentencing him to hang and executing that sentence there and then?

As an aside, this is another example of just how worryingly unreliable modern juries in the retard society are. Might always have been that way but they certainly seem to have deteriorated in quality in recent years.

 

[Smar Mijou]

As an aside, this is another example of just how worryingly unreliable modern juries in the retard society are. Might always have been that way but they certainly seem to have deteriorated in quality in recent years.

And it should be noted, while the article was unclear on what was actually said vs implied, it is not illegal to go against a judges wishes when determining guilt in a case. However, there is precedent for judicial misconduct for a judge to heavily imply or outright state that a jury must find a certain outcome in a case. For example, a judge is allowed to say that a jury must disregard certain evidence if it was found to be improper or irrelevant, but the judge is not allowed to say or imply that a "guilty" or "not guilty" verdict is mandatory. Also, jurors are not punishable by law for finding a certain way although certain courts have tried.

 

[I'm Not Racist Anymore]

Last name sounds like "darkie". How perfect.

Is there a "Abena Darkeh" here?

 

[Still Anonymous For This]

Will this guy have his sentence overturned by a higher court? Yes.

Will he also have his finances drained, his life turned upside down, and his entire existence trod upon by a court system that coddles pedophiles and serial offenders, but deliberately targets and over-charges average, law-abiding Americans? Also, yes.

 

[dustbuster]

I get that there have always been issues with immunity for state actors such as judges. "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" goes back a couple of millennia. But.... at what point does a judge's actions cross the line of no longer being a judge and being susceptible to actual civil and criminal sanctions?

Conspiracy against rights laws explicitly shield judges.
This is why democrats have been busy packing the courts with judges who will take "midnight calls" to do shit like what they've been doing to Eastman, Trump, Rudy, etc.

Any attempt to reform this exclusion better be damned explicit about what constitutes an offense, or a liberal supreme court would be able to use it to bankrupt and force the resignation of conservative judges telling troons and baby murderers to pound sand.

Btw, I find it absolutely wild that Judges don't have a dedicated security covering them.
Imagine how awful it would be if just one person were to step outside the law to remove these judges from their lifetime appointments.

 

[FuckedOffToff]

I'm just an idiot bong but surely it doesn't work like that?
And if it does - holy shit, why do you let niggers wipe their arses with the constitution without just clapping them back in chains as slaves again?
Turnabouts fair play, after all. Someone should point that out to her.

 

[Sneedenhagen Chew]

Abena Darkeh needs to be removed from her seat, tried and convicted of treason and punished in the appropriate manner, as the judicial system and constitution says.

 

[AnotherPleb]

As an aside, this is another example of just how worryingly unreliable modern juries in the retard society are.

You know damn well there's journowhores prepped to dox juries that don't play ball after Rittenhouse got off

Also, jurors are not punishable by law for finding a certain way although certain courts have tried.

Not punishable by the law. By the hired goons? They intend to change that.

I'm just an idiot bong but surely it doesn't work like that?

It shouldn't but we live in .

 

[the_hidden_one]

It sucks for the guy, but this is the kind of case that can set good precedents. The only reason Roe vs Wade got thrown out is because the a case happened that ended up in front of the Supreme Court.

 

[Echo_Ender]

Saying "The 2nd amendment doesn't apply to this courtroom" is like saying "The constitution doesn't apply to this courtroom" and not only has no legal basis, but is illegal.

It should be, but isn't. Rules for thee, not for me.

Btw, I find it absolutely wild that Judges don't have a dedicated security covering them.
Imagine how awful it would be if just one person were to step outside the law to remove these judges from their lifetime appointments.

These kinda judges don't need it because of the bubble they live in. These fucks live in gated communities (With guards), work in a courthouse (With guards), and spend all their off-work time in heavily-patrolled high-income areas.

That's how disconnected these fucks are from the average person and why they want guns gone: they basically spend 24/7 surrounded by armed guards who will immediatelydeal with anyonewho crosses them.

There's still danger, sure. But the opportunities are few and far between.

That said, if some of these folks leave their "Bubble" without an armed escort, that might change in a hurry.

 

[dustbuster]

These kinda judges don't need it because of the bubble they live in. These fucks live in gated communities (With guards)

When I was growing up we had a district judge in our sprawling neighborhood.
My family didn't make very much, but we could afford to live there.
There were no gates.
There were no guards.
The judge's house was at the center of this neighborhood, and aside from being the best house in the development there was nothing particularly special about it.

 

[TheDarknessGrows]

Dude will be a legend among the population if he actually ends up in prison.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

Judge Darkeh attempted to shut this argument down and led the jury to believe they would face consequences if they did not vote to convict Taylor. In reality, this is not the case. Jury nullification is not illegal, according to Varghese.

Judges usually don't permit lawyers to argue for jury nullification because it isn't technically a thing. Rather it's a combination of things like Double Jeopardy and jurors having immunity from prosecution simply because they voted in a way the state dislikes (unless they were bribed into voting the way they did).

On an unrelated note, judges really hate it when you stand outside of courthouses handing out pamphlets discussing jury nullification. There have been criminal prosecutions for doing this but they have been ultimately overturned by federal courts.

 

[Mark Goldbridge]

The liberal blacks that have a fair few white men in their heritage and possibly jewish heritage DESPISE american blacks that love america and the freedoms given. They are jealous that someone has a hobby that doesn't involve smoking weed, assaulting white business owners or occupying cushy local government positions.

 

[Particle Bored]

‘You’re going to learn what Dexter is, who he is. You’re going to learn that he never fired these guns.’”

I'm all for the guy's right to do what he did, but I am curious...

He made over 20 guns and "never fired" them? I'm gonna hope this was a lawyer tactic, because how do you move on to the second gun, let alone the fourth or fifth in the same style, without actually making sure the first one works?

Like what was he planning on doing with them if he hasnt fired any of them? Maybe if he was experimenting with different designs or something, but it looks like he was just cranking out bog-standard 80% ARs and Polymer80 Glocks. If he has an actual shop and a mill, it's even more shit-simple. An afternoon project at most.

 

[Agent Abe Caprine]

However, when a joint ATF/NYPD task force discovered he was legally buying parts from various companies, they opened up an investigation that led to a SWAT raid and arrest.

He was buying legal things. MENACINGLY

 

[Echo_Ender]

When I was growing up we had a district judge in our sprawling neighborhood.
My family didn't make very much, but we could afford to live there.
There were no gates.
There were no guards.
The judge's house was at the center of this neighborhood, and aside from being the best house in the development there was nothing particularly special about it.

That isn't the type of judge I'm really referring to. We have several of our low-to-mid level judges out and about in the community. That's pretty normal.

The ones I'm mostly talking about are "Activist" judges that are known for putting their political agendas over the law.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

a joint ATF/NYPD task force discovered he was legally buying parts from various companies, they opened up an investigation

So, he was doing something legally, and that lead them to investigate... That seems rather counterintuitive.

 

[Daniel Wallace]

I'm all for the guy's right to do what he did, but I am curious...

He made over 20 guns and "never fired" them? I'm gonna hope this was a lawyer tactic, because how do you move on to the second gun, let alone the fourth or fifth in the same style, without actually making sure the first one works?

Like what was he planning on doing with them if he hasnt fired any of them? Maybe if he was experimenting with different designs or something, but it looks like he was just cranking out bog-standard 80% ARs and Polymer80 Glocks. If he has an actual shop and a mill, it's even more shit-simple. An afternoon project at most.

Who gives a shit? Nothing says you have to use the guns you build/own. Some people just like buying and collecting them. Maybe he's autistic and just liked milling and building them and didn't give a shit about actually taking them to the range.

 

[Particle Bored]

Who gives a shit? Nothing says you have to use the guns you build/own. Some people just like buying and collecting them. Maybe he's autistic and just liked milling and building them and didn't give a shit about actually taking them to the range.

Settle down sparky. Maybe you missed this part: I'm all for the guy's right to do what he did, but I am curious...

Not sure where you draw the line between "being curious" and "giving a shit."