I wanna open a prison for the moids where a projector plays porn and a live feed of provocative news headlines 24/7 on the wall, but they're forced to wear a chastity belt (that shocks them if they try to coom) and a desktop displaying an open A&H reply box is placed just out of reach through the cell door.
Haven't watch Aquaman. Jason Momoa looks like he smells and played that one guy in Game of Thrones who fucked the purposefully aged up danny in the books (she was like 14 in the books and D&D obviously wanted to have soft-core porno elements in the first season. This is to not say that power relations and character traits cannot be shown through sex but most of the time it's sex for the sake of sex). Never liked him as an actor and I just get intrinsically grossed out.
Well yeah, that's because the concept of rights is primarily grounded in power relations and giving reason/entrenching what you like/want so you don't have to justify it. Most of the time rights are derived from ideology and ideology can be derived from multiple sources. Eg, abortion should not be a right because my ideology and world view is derived from a book equating a right to life. The right to life > right to abortion and as such get back to the factory.
I do have to agree with your statement that he probably is; he does looks like he is a sex pest. Doesn't help that leftists often like hedonism, and hedonists often like being a sex pest.
It's psychology majors in general that are stereotyped as batshit since there are a number of them in it to try and fix themselves. Doesn't mean they complete their degree or go on to have a job in it though. There's some batshit men too and claiming there isn't disregards people like John Money.
I legitimately wonder what kind of therapy or psychology sessions are good for these types of men. Do you WANT help? Only from another man? What if we can't find that man and femoids are the only ones willing to help? Why aren't they acceptable? What makes a woman less acceptable?
I met a few and some of them are good. And I've met others who are batshit. One was a Chinese doctor who believed that women were hysteronic when they got side effects from medication, too many repeat stories about it.
Male + BPD rage and emotions = intense self destruction. I wonder if we don't see as many BPD dudes long term since they tend to either self terminate or prison for life themselves early. Also, glad you got away from that horror show.
“I like to maintain a set of standards”
Awwww the poor widdle sex offender is so bullied and oppressed lol what a polesmoker
>It's not like her dark past is searchable
You know, you've made me realize that there is quite a bit of overlap between what the trad moids want in a woman and what Classic Era Chris wanted.
BPDs aren't totally incapable of controlling themselves, and will moderate their behaviour based on consequences. I think the majority of BPD males aren't getting jailed or suiciding early, I think they're flying under the radar, avoiding the mental health system as much as they can, and never being diagnosed because they're aware that having public ragefits will terrify bystanders and probably send them straight to jail.
Cody Ko and Noel Miller
Saying there's no such thing as personality disorders is no different to saying there's no such thing as "shitty people". They're all clusters of personality traits that have been recognised and labelled, and they're pretty useful shorthands when determining what kind of therapy is appropriate for people, because therapists generally need to be a little more specific than than just writing down in their notes "garbo person, lol idk".
This is the tricky thing about psychology as compared to other, more "scientific" fields of medicine. To begin with everything is in the head, and there's not even anything physical that can be seen in the nervous structure or lobes of the brain--to my current knowledge--that would provide hard evidence for the majority of personality disorders. If somebody has cancer, you can see the tumor, and you can surgically remove it. If somebody has a more "concrete" mental illness like schizophrenia, there are very particular symptoms that can't be easily ascribed to other complications, and I believe there is a visual tell of it in the sufferers' brains (for schizophrenics specifically, there is a change in the size of certain cortices relative to non-sufferers).
I like what you're saying in general, but think you're coming at the whole topic from a false premise. Personality disorders aren't mental illnesses, and they're not treated as mental illnesses. They're just very specific ways of saying 'weird person whose behaviour is incompatible with normal society.'
>sex offender's name is easily searchable online
Momoa plays a pretty effeminate villain in Fast X. He's better than most of the other villains (not saying much), and it's pretty funny that it's implied his less-than-masculine characteristics are the result of brain damage. Momoa himself apparently pushed for some of these characteristics himself (painted nails that change every scene to match his outfit, wearing lots of pink, hair in silk scrunchies, etc) which could be considered sus.
He can't name a single concrete thing she did to him.
Even other men won't pretend that men won't bend over backwards for pussy. This is why post-nut clarity is even a thing for men; they will compromise their values and morals and bed the most vile wench/beat their meat to the most vile content. Then once the horny dissipates, they realize what they've done. Some never even reach the self-awareness to feel shame, look no further than that whole thread about pretending to be gay to bang FtMs.
As I said before, psychology is as of now (and probably always will be, to some extent) a very subjective principle in a way that other categories of medicine are not. This subjectivity also means that law and medical standards surrounding it can vary from place to place. Perhaps personality disorders are not considered mental illnesses in Australia. But even if they are not considered that everywhere, by everyone, they are often considered a subgroup of mental illness because A) many of them have symptoms in common with more "typical" mental illnesses and B) sometimes they are considered to impede thinking, self-control and emotional regulation.
If this was the case, and there was no additional (viz. psychological) component to it, then you are contradicting your earlier statement that there is a distinction between "bad/antisocial person" and "person with personality disorder".
