Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[Lidl Drip]

I really hate the men in dresses in the tech industry that are trying to knock KF offline every day and the men in the tech industry that bend the knee to those men without question. When have men become so utterly cucked that they let trannyfaggots tell them what to do? Why do they all suck the troondick? It's so fucking embarrassing how weak men are now. It used to be trannyfaggots would get ridiculed by other men and shoved into lockers and just straight up be beaten for making a move on them but now they are letting them run everything and are running scared of them instead. Imagine being a man and a trannyfaggot calls up your wife in the middle of the night to intimidate her and instead of beating the shit out of this trannyfaggot you piss and shit yourself and give in to his demands.

Null is a real one for being the only one to put up some resistance against these freaks but he is only one guy and all other men in the industry are turning their back on him for it and gobbling the troondick. It's sickening.

 

[ConsentAccidentVictimNo98]

I learned something today
View attachment 5443452
Apparently telling teenage girls to cut themselves and then fantasising about cumming in the wounds is a thing.

Yeah, this is what liberal feminism (and liberalism in more generally does) is that it gives off the illusion of freedom, and free rights whilst we're still naturally subjugated by the world around us. This logic really forms the argument of second wave feminist critiques of porn, especially when the third wave really came about. It was the idea that by trying to normalize the idea of porn through liberal rhetoric, what it really does it creates the expectation for women to continue to demean themselves. It's totes freedom of speech guys to shove 4 dicks up your ass for some neckbeard to get off! When we are to also consider that porn consumption typically leads to the consumer wanting to watch more, and more extreme stuff what we thus get is a natural progression in pushing for both acceptability for more extreme acts (because you must support liberal feminism or else the men will send you back to the kitchen SO you must be a little, worthless whore and prostitute yourself online for them! Which is a shame that a lot of people come to believe this, especially because doing porn can fuck people up) and pushing to get more people into pornography. Such that this naturally converges in some really horrific and demeaning things; but are presented to not be. Which is funny because if you watch the fake ass "casting interviews" the Pornographer is usually like "oh yeah, you can stop at any time. We totally believe in consent guys!!!". We're probably at a point where there are far more extreme things then telling people to cut themselves and fantasizing about cumming in the wounds.

Still sort of funny how the entire liberal message about women enjoying sex is not actually derived from the enjoyment of women. The clitoris? Never heard of it.

Sorry if that read like ass. But yeah, it's horrendous.

View attachment 5444362

I still find it funny when men complain about the draft as if the homefront is any better in the extreme case whereby the US would be willing to actually bring it back. I mean yeah, I'm a male from britbongistan so we technically don't have the draft here but I'm not afraid of the prospect of it (plus I'm on the spectrum soooo they sure as hell won't be giving me a gun and I technically couldn't join the military in any active frontline role anyways. At least the last time I checked). A lot of the time men use "the draft" they use it in terms . Specifically with yanks, they don't really have any concept of how future wars would be fought. A war with China would be primarily based around air and naval power. Not with infantry men storming the beaches of China. A war with Russia? I very much doubt it. Iran or anything in the middle east would also have a strong aviation focus. The draft argument is really dumb. Specially when the US has a big enough army for conflicts where a land invasion would be desired. Vietnam was a different societal context.

Now though, imagine a total war whereby women would be left at the home front it won't be easy. Especially considering that not all men would be brought into the draft. I like to imagine other men think of it basically being the women sending the man off to fight so they can all have a fun few years together gossiping and sipping wine. It really isn't. All the creepy old men would be coming out from the retirement home, dosed up on viagra being ready to creep on the streets. Plus the men left? They'll probably not even wash themselves in the absurd belief that the only reason they did so before hand was to get laid. They'll pretend to never have heard of moisturizer and that they don't need to wash because "sweating is just your body naturally washing itself" (okay they'll be the men that believe this already but still). Women will be forced to work longer, have to deal with more creeps on an ever higher level. If the city falls, they'll be a bunch of men ready to fuck; without the consideration of the women. It ain't some fun ladies night in the town.

But hey! They aren't getting shot at right? Right?

 

[Major]

Unfathomably based I have had a seething passionate hatred for Rome ever since I found out they crucified dogs as part of a yearly holiday, and everything else I learned about them just adds to it. They invented nothing on their own, they copied literally every technological and cultural development they ever had from their neighbours, they had women raped by goats and baboons as a spectator sport, they were the most savage, vicious, lead poisoned, mentally retarded low iq barbarians in the known world, and then they had the absolute hypocritical stones to call themselves the 'civilised' ones.

If I had a time machine the first thing I'd do is go beat off in the middle of teutoburgerwald while pieces of dead Romans are still nailed to all the trees, and the second thing I'd do is show pokemon episodes to Julius Caesar.

Throughout history the most intolerant and selfish win. Always have, always will.

 

[The Axolotl Throttle]

Greek mythology it’s a huge red flag for me.

I personally enjoy Greek mythology a lot, and I think if you look deeper than the moid interpretation ("man stronk ooga booga") you'll find it's pretty nuanced and smart. Everyone's a complex antihero, and I love it. One rule in Greek myth is that the chad alpha sigma moid ALWAYS gets fucked in the end, which is based. I've never really seen a Greek myth where women were treated as objectively lesser -- batshit crazy, sure, but that happened to the men, too. That's not to romanticize ancient Greek society at all, Athens especially treated women like shit, but I think we make the same mistakes as the moids if we pretend that historical literature (at the very least) is black-and-white.

I also personally hate a lot of feminist retelling of myths, mostly because they miss the point of the stories theyre adapting, and that pisses me off. The point of these myths is to teach a lesson, and if your adaptation doesn't add to that lesson, then there's no point in reading it. But I also think that our interpretation of history is moidified. For instance, it's confirmed by census records that women in the Renaissance period (I forgot where, I'm so sorry) had trades and participated in the economy much like their husbands did, but for some reason it's "traditional" to view women as only good for domestic work, which is already a retarded negative IQ take in the first place and confirms that moids have no clue what the fuck a woman is because they're too busy jerking it to anime waifus or something.

Also, the Greeks hated the gays more than we hate moids. Literal frothing at the mouth levels of hatred and disgust. But I digress.

 

[Stan]

A lot of animals that can make it to a ripe old age and live in family groups have this "grandparent rule." Elephants and orcas are the best examples, since their herds/pods are led by the eldest female, who is often the grandmother of the youngest members of the group. However, elephants are more based since they kick out any male children who reach maturity.

Yes. This helps prevent inbreeding: the males are big fucking tanks and range around from herd to herd, and the females stick to a known territory where they know the grazing and water is sufficient.

Others have spoken about the grandparent rule, and it does link with the existence of menopause - the older women cease to be fertile in order to not be in competition with younger women, and their role in society shifts to sharing their experience and knowledge.

I think it’s also an important consideration that 60 year old women are probably physically incapable of tolerating a pregnancy. The process is not easy on the body.

 

[Whiskey]

Yup. This is why you hear constantly about the "male loneliness epidemic" but never hear jackshit about female loneliness--presumably if more young men are single, there must also be an increasing number of single women (because it's not like we're turning gay en-masse, are we). But when we're single, we are happier, more productive, and don't sit around whinging about why no one will fuck us, so "female loneliness" is not a favorite topic of news headlines.

Also: I know there's not that many lesbians in here, but apparently it's now possible to inject DNA from a woman into artificial sperm or something? So maybe in 5 or 10 years it might be possible for wlw couples to have and raise bio kids with 0 male involvement. (Which is way more feasible than gay men and their artificial wombs or w/e)

I think it comes down to age demographics. Younger men struggle since most are uncompetitive and offer little for women in their prime.

I tend to agree this reverses later in life when men are either established or dead by their own hand and cut their dating pool to those roughly 25. At that point women start to find themselves on the back foot.

I'm going to take a guess and say the issue occurs for both genders but at different ages.

 

[Stan]

Unfathomably based I have had a seething passionate hatred for Rome ever since I found out they crucified dogs as part of a yearly holiday, and everything else I learned about them just adds to it. They invented nothing on their own, they copied literally every technological and cultural development they ever had from their neighbours, they had women raped by goats and baboons as a spectator sport, they were the most savage, vicious, lead poisoned, mentally retarded low iq barbarians in the known world, and then they had the absolute hypocritical stones to call themselves the 'civilised' ones.

If I had a time machine the first thing I'd do is go beat off in the middle of teutoburgerwald while pieces of dead Romans are still nailed to all the trees, and the second thing I'd do is show pokemon episodes to Julius Caesar.

The Rome and Greece simps are 9/10 white nationalists. (The last one is a Classicist: a linguist/historian of Greek and Latin.)

When I was a kid I liked Roman things a lot. I even got the high score for the school on the National Latin Exam and they gave me a little medal with “SPQR” written on it. Used to draw villas for fun cause I liked the idea of an atrium and an open air cavity in the center of one’s roof. This has sadly been ruined for me by dumbass men who played Rome: Total War and decided Romans and Greeks are retroactively “white”, and started admiring them like Hitler used to do.

And yes, the Greeks were seething misogynists and the Romans are only a little better. Patrician women had rights, but normal pleb women not so much. The average life span of someone currently living in Rome was like 3.5 years because the plebs lived in rickety fire prone housing with no access to clean water, and the patricians were drinking lead-sugar wine every night with their dormice appetizers.

 

[Goth Pierrot]

I personally enjoy Greek mythology a lot, and I think if you look deeper than the moid interpretation ("man stronk ooga booga") you'll find it's pretty nuanced and smart. Everyone's a complex antihero, and I love it. One rule in Greek myth is that the chad alpha sigma moid ALWAYS gets fucked in the end, which is based. I've never really seen a Greek myth where women were treated as objectively lesser -- batshit crazy, sure, but that happened to the men, too. That's not to romanticize ancient Greek society at all, Athens especially treated women like shit, but I think we make the same mistakes as the moids if we pretend that historical literature (at the very least) is black-and-white.

I also personally hate a lot of feminist retelling of myths, mostly because they miss the point of the stories theyre adapting, and that pisses me off. The point of these myths is to teach a lesson, and if your adaptation doesn't add to that lesson, then there's no point in reading it. But I also think that our interpretation of history is moidified. For instance, it's confirmed by census records that women in the Renaissance period (I forgot where, I'm so sorry) had trades and participated in the economy much like their husbands did, but for some reason it's "traditional" to view women as only good for domestic work, which is already a retarded negative IQ take in the first place and confirms that moids have no clue what the fuck a woman is because they're too busy jerking it to anime waifus or something.

Also, the Greeks hated the gays more than we hate moids. Literal frothing at the mouth levels of hatred and disgust. But I digress.

Sparta was definitely a lot better than Athens was. Imo a perfect society would be like Sparta, we send all the men out to war to cull the weak and all the women would handle all the important stuff like running society, because silly male brains can't handle stuff like that :3

 

[AmberHeardSupporter]

Throughout history the most intolerant and selfish win. Always have, always will.

funny how the most intolerant and selfish have always been men

I think it comes down to age demographics. Younger men struggle since most are uncompetitive and offer little for women in their prime.

I tend to agree this reverses later in life when men are either established or dead by their own hand and cut their dating pool to those roughly 25. At that point women start to find themselves on the back foot.

I'm going to take a guess and say the issue occurs for both genders but at different ages.

you’re literally just saying the exact same thing that weirdo was saying just with nicer terms

 

[Stan]

Sparta was definitely a lot better than Athens was. Imo a perfect society would be like Sparta, we send all the men out to war to cull the weak and all the women would handle all the important stuff like running society, because silly male brains can't handle stuff like that :3

Wut no unless you *really* like camping and buggery

 

[Lidl Drip]

A fun fact about men is that they do not have the emotional intelligence and empathy required to figure out other people's motivations and feelings, especially women's. Men will even admit that women's inner workings are a total mystery to them, hence why they can never figure out why their girlfriend is upset with them. So whenever a man assumes something about a woman you know that it is 100% projection since men are not capable of putting their own lived experience aside to think about how someone who is different from them might think. That's why men always do the whole "You don't like men? It must be because you don't get DICK" projection. Cause that is their reason for not liking women, because those evil women won't put out.

 

[Second Missing Primarch]

My close friends and I discussed the Roman Empire meme a while back, and the consensus was that most of them don't ever think about it except when my best friend and I (who are really really annoyingly dorky about history in general) start spamming Rome memes at each other in the group chat. Even then, we both agree that the three legions getting obliterated in the Teutoburg Forest is one of the funniest things in human history.

 

[Dyn]

Sparta was definitely a lot better than Athens was. Imo a perfect society would be like Sparta, we send all the men out to war to cull the weak and all the women would handle all the important stuff like running society, because silly male brains can't handle stuff like that :3

Sparta was significantly worse than Athens. Wealth and power being hoarded by the 0.01% of ultra-rich billionaire noblewomen while the majority of the population were slaves who got treated worse than animals and routinely raped and murdered by child soldiers is not the kind of society I think we should aspire to.

 

[JambledUpWords]

I also personally hate a lot of feminist retelling of myths, mostly because they miss the point of the stories theyre adapting, and that pisses me off. The point of these myths is to teach a lesson, and if your adaptation doesn't add to that lesson, then there's no point in reading it. But I also think that our interpretation of history is moidified. For instance, it's confirmed by census records that women in the Renaissance period (I forgot where, I'm so sorry) had trades and participated in the economy much like their husbands did, but for some reason it's "traditional" to view women as only good for domestic work, which is already a retarded negative IQ take in the first place and confirms that moids have no clue what the fuck a woman is because they're too busy jerking it to anime waifus or something.

Throughout history, women generally would work in some capacity in addition to raising kids. In the medieval era, these were possible job avenues. The idea that women were all stay-at-home moms until after the women’s liberation movement is very false. Even in the 1950s, roughly 1 in 3 women worked:

It always amazes me to see alleged history spergs claim women didn’t contribute much, and act like women being a major part of the workforce as a new thing. Though, the ones that talk like this generally don’t care for social or cultural history, and will be very focused on military history. I like military history too, but there’s so much more than just that.

 

[Goth Pierrot]

Sparta was significantly worse than Athens. Wealth and power being hoarded by the 0.01% of ultra-rich billionaire noblewomen while the majority of the population were slaves who got treated worse than animals and routinely raped and murdered by child soldiers is not the kind of society I think we should aspire to.

That's fair, I still think an ideal society would be one where women are in charge of politics and the economy, and men are made to fight in the military most of the time. Either that or, they can just used for manual labour.

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

Ok I’m just gonna schizosperg here but I hate men who simp for the Roman Empire and Greek mythology it’s a huge red flag for me. That article asking how many men thought of rome pissed me off because I genuinely feel like men like it just because women were oppressed and they love the faggotlike camaraderie men had at the time. Especially with the Greeks. It’s always jokes about how the Greeks were based because they were gay and hated women because men now are faggots and hate women and it’s so annoying that women’s oppression gets viewed as a joke ESPECIALLY if you can uplift another minority while bashing women. Make jokes like this about anti black times or anti gay times and it wouldn’t slide but obsessing over and defending one of if not the most misogynistic periods of time for women is no big deal for men because men hate women and it doesn’t even occur to them how much they hate us. Case in point
View attachment 5444794
interesting that that’s viewed as a joke. Even weirder that I’m sure this user posts here but this annoyed the shit out of me I just hate men and their oppression of women and their reverence for oppressive times for women so much

Lmao are we doing purity tests now?

Tell me how distorting history will help womens rights? Pretending that romans were progresive and interpreting no throwing faggots and trannies off the roof as yes they allowed rights for lgbt and they were more progressive than the whites will help anyone anything? And yeah i am frustrated by western women to push progressivism and ideology in branches that should be objective as much as possible. Not to mention they give all women a bad name and fullfill the stereotypes of being useless outside of the kitchen. Like genuinely women like these are free marketing campaigns for sharia law.

Also i am impressed not by the roman society or army or philosophy but the fucking architecture and engineering is a marvel to behold aqueducts that were used well into 20th century, roads that are still used, houses and bricks built still in use. Heck even roman cement we haven't figured it out until recently. Did it sucked dick yeah but you can still marvel at what they built.

 

[Dyn]

It always amazes me to see alleged history spergs claim women didn’t contribute much, and act like women being a major part of the workforce as a new thing.

You ever see those medieval depictions of classical stories? Like, some French guy in the 1300's makes a tapestry depicting Julius Caesar getting shivved or whatever, and he draws it so everyone is wearing contemporary pantaloons and medieval-man hats, because the idea of people dressing differently 1,000 years ago is completely foreign to him.

That's what I think this is. History spergs have an understanding of what medieval men wore (especially to go off warring), but because they ignore so much social history they're still picturing that 1950's idyll where families live in little suburban rowhouses and the husband kisses his goodwyfe on the cheek before commuting to work at the blacksmith shop, and then she sweeps the house for 8 hours straight and cooks dinner.

 

[AmberHeardSupporter]

Lmao are we doing purity tests now?

Yeah

And yeah i am frustrated by western women to push progressivism and ideology in branches that should be objective as much as possible. Not to mention they give all women a bad name and fullfill the stereotypes of being useless outside of the kitchen. Like genuinely women like these are free marketing campaigns for sharia law.

Oh wow this is INTENSE nlogism this is so pathetic I’m actually embarasssed. I can’t even imagine going into a thread filled with misogynistic men and pullimg the “modern western women are retards” schtick that’s so sad lol

 

[Freya]

>oppressed for the entirety of human history
>finally manage to take over a drama forum
life is good

 

[Alligator Alcatraz]

All of the craft interests I’ve taken up have all been tranny free (thus far) as well.

Every “male” hobby space I’ve gone into, even dedicated “womens” meetups, are girldick city. But traditional “female” activities, never. Occasionally you might get an Aiden cross stitching trans flag on tea towels, but trannys’ oh so female brains have no interest in that shit.

Maybe because they associate it with old women they don’t want to fuck and therefore no euphoria boners.

I think the only hobby I have which doesnt have trannies is car detailing. I'm still working on a theory, but my current idea is that car detailing requires ownership of at least one vehicle in the first place and includes hygeine topics trannies do not understand.

For instance, you need a series of specific towels for the exterior and interior of the vehicle. You also need subgroups of towels for different purposes, like towels for glass, drying, tires, touch-up, waxing, etc. These towels cannot be washed together and most are microfiber. You need to have knowledge on how to maintain polyester fabrics otherwise you could damage your vehicle with swirl scratches, harmful chemicals used on another part of the vehice, and reintroduce grime back onto the vehicle. These in-depth practices into textiles is too much for the coombrain that does not like hygeine and is more focused on appealing to others.

Additionally, car detailing is a solitary practice. Since everyone has their own preferences for cleaning their vehicles, people do it alone. Transexuals need external validation and social interaction, so they find no value in it. Thus, car detailing is troon-free. At most, troons might buy a nice vehicle and just take it to the automatic car wash if they clean the vehicle at all.