Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

I see moids acting as if it’s impossible for women to be lonely because they get lots of attention from guys as the default.
someone i consider an acquaintance literally said this to me recently as he was telling me how lonely he was and how i wouldn't understand it. annoying that i have to describe to an adult how being lonely isn't specific to gender.
 
Men: *troon out*
Everyone: women responsible for this,
No, you don't understand! If it wasn't for evil tabloid ragebait journo sites like Buzzfeed pumping out articles how men are evil and EVIL FEMINAZI women invading men's spaces by being able to play video games and advance their careers in a clown system they set up to prevent them from being to climb it, men wouldn't hecking troon out!!
🥺 🥺🥺

I find it interesting you can find so many articles from the past that constantly shit on women, calling them neurotic and insane, especially the women that
rejected the societal roles that were imposed on them or God forbid, pointing out the fact they're treated terribly, yet there wasn't an epidemic of women
pooning out because they we're constantly spat on.

"But what about women that cross-dressed and pretended to be men in the past, though?"

Hmm.. it's like women cross-dressed to be able to get education, work and also defend their country during wars, because men were purposefully preventing them access to do that, and not because they we're getting aroused at the idea of being a man after consuming gargantuan amounts of porn and media that completely distorts their view of the opposite sex.
 
Last edited:
Is this really all it takes to be an ideal woman or is this bullshit?
View attachment 6093583
Its a bs lie . Not a cunt or bitch or whatever is basically you never question me and ask me to do anything. Simple as. They always dress these things as simple things also 6.5 in moid language is the top 10% women in looks .
 
Men: *troon out*
Everyone: women responsible for this,
God, do I miss r/ItsAFetish. Troons having full-on mask-off moments admitting that they get erect while wearing women's clothes, daydreaming that high school sleepovers must secretly be a lesbian scissor-fest, chimping out on yuri subs because they wanted them to start being "trans-inclusive" to match their own "identities," bragging about wandering naked around changing rooms, wondering if women orgasm from putting in tampons, fantasizing about forcing unsuspecting dates to bow to the girldick. As if any woman who isn't a non-shitlib pickme wants these kinds of people in their lives or societies. Men already feel comfy talking publicly about how they only view us for sex and care about our looks, it's not like the narrative magically becomes different just because they start wearing skirts.

I had to change my profile picture on FB because men in my comments would default to calling me fat and ugly if I hurt their fee fees.
On a couple of occasions I was told I'm "too ugly to rape."
Joking about or threatening rape is just banter. Now, jokes about small dicks or male patterned baldness... that's just a line you don't cross!

I see moids acting as if it’s impossible for women to be lonely because they get lots of attention from guys as the default. Not all attention is good attention. I don’t know if moids understand this (they likely don’t), but attention from men that only want to use you for a one night stand are why some women don’t like said attention. Being viewed as a sex object by the opposite sex isn’t a loneliness cure.
In their heads, women can't leave the house without being hit up by attractive, interesting, nice men who want nothing more than their attention... instead of some fat balding manlet in a rusty pickup truck, stained cargo shorts and a Spotify Wrapped topped by Morgan Wallen calling you an ugly bitch because you weren't interested in him belching "nice ass" at you from a nearby barstool. It doesn't matter though, men refuse to entertain this reality, they would rather keep up the burgeoning revenge fantasy that you deserve being an ugly cat lady because you turned down the dozens of roses that cute boys-next-door have been trying to woo you with.
 
The Satanic Panic case I was thinking of was actually the McMartin preschool case, amongst others. No conclusive evidence of Satanic ritual abuse (and its new form, adrenochrome trafficking) has ever been found. Meanwhile, innocent people have been thrown in prison over it, such as the McMartin family members, some of whom served more than ten years in prison for something that literally could not have happened in the way the children described it. People complain about how criminals have tons of rights, but that is absolutely for a reason; people have been thrown in prison and had their lives and careers ruined over unsubstantiated allegations.
For anyone who hasn't read this through, there's a random document from what should be a different FBI file thrown in here, one on McMartin preschool, in which the investigator found children's accessories (lunchboxes and the sort) dated to the appropriate times, extensive tunnels and alarms set up underground, and literal goat blood.
Obviously certain bits that the kids were coached to say (e.g. going through the toilet itself) were just that - coached or coaxed responses - but the evidence is somewhat overwhelmingly in favor of this incident being an issue.
For those unaware, this is a FOIA dump from an unrelated scandal, which seems to indicate "satanic panic" being the government-sanctioned term for encouraging the public to dismiss any related cases of child abuse as nonsense.
FBI vault mostly on The Finders Cult [which makes almost anything believable, and this doc came up as a search result for McMartin, but there's a lot to go through]
If you don't want to go through it, don't worry because I already have!
The night ended with my roommate at the time having to pick me up from the bar because that was some intensely depressing shit to read through, but she may still have my notes from the deep dive. She actually thought they were schizophrenic ramblings until she asked me about them and we went through the documents together the next day lmao
 
Its a bs lie . Not a cunt or bitch or whatever is basically you never question me and ask me to do anything. Simple as. They always dress these things as simple things also 6.5 in moid language is the top 10% women in looks .
You've reminded me of the absolute hilarious shitshow that is /r/truerateme.

This "gem" of a subreddit is managed by a handful of scrotes that claim that no woman (or man) is ever a 10.
It's pure unadulterated moid copium and cringe where ugly unseen males vote on the attractiveness of others and tear down any woman foolish enough to post there.
They've gotten shit for years because of their bias against women.

Their helpful sidebar provides the "scientific analysis" to explain their rating system so worthy to check out for the laughs:
Sidebar.jpg

But for the sake of post brevity, I've captured the most hilarious important part:

The Photographic Ranking Guides

Women's Version
Attractiveness as assessed by scrotes.jpeg
Link

For comparison, the men's:
Male attractiveness as assessed by scrotes.jpeg
Link

As a 100% heterosexual woman, I find the female 3.5 rankings more attractive than the male 5 rankings.

"We age like wine" - Nope you age like prawns left out in the Australian summer heat
:story:
 
If you don't want to go through it, don't worry because I already have!
I went back and downloaded all four sections; I'd had the earlier thing bookmarked & couldn't believe I forgot to collect'em all 🤠
-- btw what do you think of Dave McGowan? Over the years he's gotten a lot of respect, even when his politics might clash with readers; I suspect it's because he was mostly a humble researcher and gave Mae Brussell credit where it was due. After comparing DM to Tom O'Neill's CHAOS, I was disappointed at what he skimmed over/redacted/elided/whatever, given his access, and wasted too many pages complaining about Bugliosi [merited, but if something was cut to make room for that, a pisser] and yakking about Skorzeny, leaving out the fact that he wound up working for the Mossad.
 
Joking about or threatening rape is just banter. Now, jokes about small dicks or male patterned baldness... that's just a line you don't cross!
The "best" part was that it was on a FB post where I was opening up about a time I was sexually harassed at work by a supervisor. Some dudes decided I must have been lying because "who would sexually harass an ugly girl."
 
I went back and downloaded all four sections; I'd had the earlier thing bookmarked & couldn't believe I forgot to collect'em all 🤠
-- btw what do you think of Dave McGowan? Over the years he's gotten a lot of respect, even when his politics might clash with readers; I suspect it's because he was mostly a humble researcher and gave Mae Brussell credit where it was due. After comparing DM to Tom O'Neill's CHAOS, I was disappointed at what he skimmed over/redacted/elided/whatever, given his access, and wasted too many pages complaining about Bugliosi [merited, but if something was cut to make room for that, a pisser] and yakking about Skorzeny, leaving out the fact that he wound up working for the Mossad.
My familiarity with McGowan is mostly limited to his writings on 9/11, although I think his assessment of pedophilia as a form of effectively buckbreaking the general population and forcing people to defend the indefensible was very accurate. The entire Finders incident and its origins indicate to me that this was intended to be weaponized as a demoralization tool against foreign countries.
I will absolutely have to read more of his books, since there was only one released in my language back when I was first made aware of him. If you have any recommendations, please lay them on me!
Also plenty of the news articles from the 70s and 80s that used to be around discussing these things have conveniently disappeared in the past few years, including one in particular about an international organ harvest/trafficking ring being uncovered by arrests in Guatemala that was referenced in the documents. The paper that hosted it without issue until late 2021 or early 2022 now wants something like $150 for the article now, 40 years after the fact.
Unrelated to anything, your profile picture brings me immense joy and I've been meaning to share that for quite a while now lol
The "best" part was that it was on a FB post where I was opening up about a time I was sexually harassed at work by a supervisor. Some dudes decided I must have been lying because "who would sexually harass an ugly girl."
Every single time, the moment it actually happens it's "nuh uh because she's not attractive enough!" Meanwhile the same guy was usually musing over how much he'd want to immediately before, because they SUCK at keeping their stories straight.
I hope you're doing alright now, and sorry to hear you've dealt with it before...
 
Last edited:
This is more specifically about incels, but incels will see any mildly attractive woman and assume she’s just having a bunch of casual sex. It’s a very annoying assumption, but only one would get by watching too much porn.
Incels are insane. When I was in high school I kinda had a crush on a guy who claimed to be a "volcel", at the time I had no idea what that was. Last year he messaged me and asked how I was doing, I told him that I went to a university party and this fucker replied "disgusting the things you do for dick".
It's fucking weird how the first thing he assumes is that girls go to parties just to have sex, even if said girl isn't the type to do stuff like that (that's the case here lol). Really shows that incels watch too much porn.
 
This is more specifically about incels, but incels will see any mildly attractive woman and assume she’s just having a bunch of casual sex. It’s a very annoying assumption, but only one would get by watching too much porn.
It's the Elliot Rodger MO being parroted more than anything, really, they have been on a vicious cycle of idolization and imitation of his anticts since a few months after the Isla Vista shootings. The guy was young, hormonal, superficial and had an inferiority complex regarding sex, even going as far as being jealous of the posibility of his younger brother stopping being a virgin before him, and getting off to the sounds of his sister and her boyfriend having sex in the room next door to him.

There's a reason why he became famous among that group while George Sodini is probably an unknown for most of them. Rodger had the right age, the right vocabulary, the internet presence, and, first and foremost, he was relateable.

The incels have not left the (most likely idealized, but they don't really care if its true or not, and I don't either) period of their lives where the expected is to go party at least once a week and women (or more accurately, teenage girls) behave like cats in heat banging every boy that gets near to them. They haven't mentally left that phase of their lives, and due to their proclivities to projection and exaggeration, they think that the rest of the world hasn't either. Because the popular guys told them that they had lots of sex, and they are prone to believe anything they are told at face value during their youth, they think that the chads are actual lady killers, and thus the girls are necessarily hoes, because otherwise the chads and incels wouldn't be that sexually different, and that's impossible.
 
buckbreaking the general population
^this part especially reminds me of Programmed to Kill, which was my entry point; Weird Scenes Inside the Canyon corresponds more directly to CHAOS, but since the research is all about the Phoenix Program and military intelligence, MK Ultra, &c. there is a lot of overlap.
I remember reading PtK and finding his website, where I suppose he was working out ideas for books as a sort of periodical style -- I seem to remember an early version of WSItC drip fed as a serial, like blog entries. When he died, his daughter maintained the site L|A
 
I see moids acting as if it’s impossible for women to be lonely because they get lots of attention from guys as the default. Not all attention is good attention. I don’t know if moids understand this (they likely don’t), but attention from men that only want to use you for a one night stand are why some women don’t like said attention. Being viewed as a sex object by the opposite sex isn’t a loneliness cure.
They don’t understand or care because they do not have empathy for women. Those men complain not just because they hate women but because they’re desperate to be treated like one.
 
I see moids acting as if it’s impossible for women to be lonely because they get lots of attention from guys as the default. Not all attention is good attention. I don’t know if moids understand this (they likely don’t), but attention from men that only want to use you for a one night stand are why some women don’t like said attention. Being viewed as a sex object by the opposite sex isn’t a loneliness cure.
Moids don't understand Carl Gustav Jung definition of loneliness, even though they would probably quote it and say something like "Women can never understand men!". Like how they talk about how women should be grateful for fake compliments, because the remember that one genuine compliment and it makes them feel good. Great! Women also like genuine compliments and remember them fondly.

It's fucking weird how the first thing he assumes is that girls go to parties just to have sex, even if said girl isn't the type to do stuff like that (that's the case here lol). Really shows that incels watch too much porn.
They just can't grasp their head around that there are humans out there that don't care that much about sex. Now they will call a women simple minded or dumb, but can't grasp a simple concept like "not everyone is like you".
 
Back