Funniest thing is that she actually says that she is open for a relationship, but she never met the right guy. He fucking complains that she wants a partner that she actually enjoys to be with and vice versa.
Probably. That's when the PUA shit really exploded, and of course one of the fundamentals is that "just be yourself" is bad advice because, actually, you're a loser. Self-improvement takes effort and might actually be impossible.
I admit I have not watched this video before I write this, but the reason you can't adapt Lolita well for the screen is obvious: Nabokov himself couldn't do it. His point was that Humbert is so unreliable as a narrator that as the reader, we realise that what he is describing simply isn't happening. He is describing a 'relationship' that doesn't exist; Humbert is just Lo's abuser. He's describing a Lolita who doesn't exist ("it occurred to me I simply did not know a thing about the inside of my darling's mind"). Occasionally Nabokov tweaks the curtain just enough that we the readers can see that Humbert himself knows this is a pure fantasy and tissue of lies ("her sobs in the night - every night, every night - the moment I feigned sleep").
Make Puppets Great Again.
fr there are these gross disembodied torso things meant to be used as sexual aids. It's like half a torso (back is flattened so it sits flush to the table) and then all the limbs have been amputated, so it's just a vulva and vagine, stomach, fake boobs, anime head.
Men do this on purpose as a form of disrespect. You see it a lot when men discuss a woman they do not like - they will almost never refer to her by her real name and always default to a childlike diminutive name (e.g. "Jessie" instead of "Jessica".) The reason for that is to reframe your discussion as being like one between an adult and a child, instead of two adults.
This part especially got a chuckle from me. Any man that owns one of these should feel bad about himself.
No its probably the culture my home country always they look at the husband to approve if he is present in norway they always look at the wife if she is present to approve because women hold the purse strings and decision making. Also depends what are you buying clothes and baby shit its always the woman asked, cars is the man, appliances depends who seems holding the purse strings.
Eastern europe lol I constantly say that
I've somehow missed this the whole time lol, sorry about that!
I assumed it was a storage and cost-cutting issue, but my manikin experience is different (and probably more adamant about sanitizing after use).
![428x500[1].jpg](http://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/attachments/6166/6166834-e5dd1a45ff86ad034945292456d65d12.jpg?hash=5d0aRf-GrQ "428x500[1].jpg")
People (and the descendants of people) who moved there because they're antisocial and it's "the last frontier?" Second guess: alcohol consumption, seasonal isolation, trapped by the weather if you're far out of town.
It's dark out for much longer (more nighttime usually means more crime), and there's not as many women in the state.
There's is some truth to this because men are also now openly rejecting to take any "low status" jobs too. In the article it features men lamenting how they don't see a point in working because the "low status" jobs and economy cannot "afford them a family" aka afford them access to women that would bear their children, which would give them high status, control and power over those women and their children. They literally want a consolation price for doing the bare minimum.
from what I've read about alaska I agree with this and aunt carol.
The rabbit hole goes deeper when you look into how many Alaskan police officers have records of domestic violence. There's even one town, Stebbins, where the whole force had convictions.
