Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

[Inside your walls]

Jeff Younger, the father that gained popularity in right-wing/conservative spheres due being involved in the controversial custody case where one of the children is a troon child who's identity is being affirmed by the mother wrote a post about how he lost all his parental rights to his children. He makes a post about how the court and society doesn't give a shit about men and fathers and proceeds to circlejerk with usual fagosphere men and pick-mes about this.

Except people have decided to take a look at the court document regarding his case and well
very interesting points that he never mentioned have been revealed.


The court documents MANY things that Jeff purposefully leaves out such as him lying to his former wife about his previous relationships, marriages, education, earnings, his position as a professor in an university and experiences in the Marines. It is also revealed that he heavily abused his ex's daughters from her previous marriage to the point one of them became suicidal and other developed a self-harming habit, and in very typical step-scrote fashion treated his own sons way better than the daughters.





Oh yeah he was also a rectum raider that never informed his ex-wife about him having homosexual relationships with other men which led to his military discharge
and she eventually learned this information after being separated. A conservatard larper that hates women to the point he's a closeted fruit loop? Must be a day
that ends with a Y.


The court docs for viewing

Conservative grifters love using Jeff Younger's case as an example of how justice system heavily favors women over men when it comes to custody cases and how there's a massive issue with munchie moms trooning out their children, especially male children but with this information we get a lot of more context, probably more than Jeff wants people to see. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised that eventually if it gets revealed that he tried doing something horrid towards the son that prompted him to start identifying as a girl in a very early age given the revelations that Jeff was a tapeworm slurper.

Reminder that when moids say how they lost custody or parental rights to their children for no reason, you can assume that
they're leaving out crucial information that will make them look less sympathetic the same way they do it when they bitch about how their
wives/girlfriends left them for "no reason"".

ANYWAYS

 

[Lidl Drip]

One thing we have gained from the troon mennace is some priceless insight into the mind of moids.



Their sexual degeneracy and sex obsession, their envy of women and their self-hatred especially. No other type of man admits so openly that they think a woman is just an assortment of parts (long hair, short skirt, make-up, breasts, heels) and that to be a woman means to be sexually objectified by men. Men want to be sexually objectified the way women are and because men can not empathize with women they think women secretly enjoy being objectified, sexually harassed and raped. Because they would enjoy it if it happened to them.

 

[Slideshow Bill]

View attachment 6667343

All of those titles exist (maybe not that last one) in gay porn, but since the gay porn industry is much smaller than the straight porn industry, men as a collective don't care. If there was an industry that preyed on poorer men and young naive men and it operated on a much larger scale, then I could see porn being banned for degrading men.

"Hey teenage boys, you're almost adults and have no plans for the future? Well, we have a fitness and wellness program to help boys become men where you'll work out and do odd jobs and as you get fit, you can be models in our advertisements jk we brutally rape you and then sell the footage and the best part is that you'll be paid thousands of dollars for each job! Sound fun?"

But then men would just use gay men as the scapegoat, like they do now.

 

[crazedaze]

Like my smeg, you fantasize about this how can you disavow it when it really happens?

The answer is they know very fucking well it happens and they say this shit so they can jerk off to the thought of triggering and hurting women. Moids deserve all the pain they bitch and complain about having. I wish they'd suffer more in stoic silence like they also bitch about.
Everything that comes out of moids' mouths is a lie and it's pointless to try to ascribe any sort of logic to them

 

[Thé au lait]

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised that eventually if it gets revealed that he tried doing something horrid towards the son that prompted him to start identifying as a girl in a very early age given the revelations that Jeff was a tapeworm slurper.

I've said it before but one of the signs you're supposed to look for is a child loathing their own body and wanting to change it. Self-harm is another major one.
I'd bet fucking money he's abusing more than just whatever son trooned out.

 

[Tragon Dirtle]

Reminder that when moids say how they lost custody or parental rights to their children for no reason, you can assume that
they're leaving out crucial information that will make them look less sympathetic the same way they do it when they bitch about how their
wives/girlfriends left them for no reason.

this thread should have highlights and this post should be one of them.

 

[Galaxolotl]

The lawyer also asked Dominique Pelicot if he loved his ex-wife “too much”:
View attachment 6667053
Good to see that male violence against their wives/girlfriends is still seen as proof of love, even in a case as deranged as this.

The Pelicot trial sure uncovered just how many men are terminally pornsick:
View attachment 6667080
View attachment 6667081
View attachment 6667085View attachment 6667087
View attachment 6667089
View attachment 6667090

Imagine giving birth to your own rapist, that is beyond insane.

 

[celona]

One thing we have gained from the troon mennace is some priceless insight into the mind of moids.

View attachment 6667567

Their sexual degeneracy and sex obsession, their envy of women and their self-hatred especially. No other type of man admits so openly that they think a woman is just an assortment of parts (long hair, short skirt, make-up, breasts, heels) and that to be a woman means to be sexually objectified by men. Men want to be sexually objectified the way women are and because men can not empathize with women they think women secretly enjoy being objectified, sexually harassed and raped. Because they would enjoy it if it happened to them.

Men transition to become sex objects, women transition to stop being sex objects

 

[S@credC]

Imagine giving birth to your own rapist, that is beyond insane.

An excellent case for aborting male fetuses

 

[Tutu]

Jeff Younger, the father that gained popularity in right-wing/conservative spheres due being involved in the controversial custody case where one of the children is a troon child who's identity is being affirmed by the mother wrote a post about how he lost all his parental rights to his children. He makes a post about how the court and society doesn't give a shit about men and fathers and proceeds to circlejerk with usual fagosphere men and pick-mes about this.

Except people have decided to take a look at the court document regarding his case and well
very interesting points that he never mentioned have been revealed.


The court documents MANY things that Jeff purposefully leaves out such as him lying to his former wife about his previous relationships, marriages, education, earnings, his position as a professor in an university and experiences in the Marines. It is also revealed that he heavily abused his ex's daughters from her previous marriage to the point one of them became suicidal and other developed a self-harming habit, and in very typical step-scrote fashion treated his own sons way better than the daughters.





Oh yeah he was also a rectum raider that never informed his ex-wife about him having homosexual relationships with other men which led to his military discharge
and she eventually learned this information after being separated. A conservatard larper that hates women to the point he's a closeted fruit loop? Must be a day
that ends with a Y.


The court docs for viewing

Conservative grifters love using Jeff Younger's case as an example of how justice system heavily favors women over men when it comes to custody cases and how there's a massive issue with munchie moms trooning out their children, especially male children but with this information we get a lot of more context, probably more than Jeff wants people to see. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised that eventually if it gets revealed that he tried doing something horrid towards the son that prompted him to start identifying as a girl in a very early age given the revelations that Jeff was a tapeworm slurper.

Reminder that when moids say how they lost custody or parental rights to their children for no reason, you can assume that
they're leaving out crucial information that will make them look less sympathetic the same way they do it when they bitch about how their
wives/girlfriends left them for "no reason"".

ANYWAYS

Yeah bro, just have bastards out of wedlock to avoid being held legally responsible for them like a ghetto nigger, it always goes well! Marriage is just so unfair to heckin moiderinos that I did it multiple times! Since you are so shameless, why don't you go ahead and explain what made your wife decide to leave you, truthfully? The gender of accountability cannot handle the consequences of their own actions.

Males will manipulate women with false promises like how this scrote lied to his ex about everything, be useless deadbeat dads, cheaters or straight up domestic abusers then victimize themselves when their kids are taken away as they should be, how could you trust someone like that with children? They feel entitled to living like a bachelor but also getting the benefits of marriage then throw a fit when it blows up in their face. You had many years to prove whether you can make a good father or not and failed.

The justice system is heavily biased towards defending shitty moids in pretty much everything, this is like one of the few areas where women tend to be favored and honestly, the percentage of mothers who get custody should be even higher considering divorced moids were dumped for a good reason and women make objectively better parents. You can fearmonger about muh single moms all you want, kids are biologically more dependent on their mothers than their fathers. If you wanted to be treated as anything more than a sperm donor, maybe you should have acted as such, cope and seethe.

 

[TNF]

Jeff Younger, the father that gained popularity in right-wing/conservative spheres due being involved in the controversial custody case where one of the children is a troon child who's identity is being affirmed by the mother wrote a post about how he lost all his parental rights to his children. He makes a post about how the court and society doesn't give a shit about men and fathers and proceeds to circlejerk with usual fagosphere men and pick-mes about this.

Yeah no I don't believe that any of his boys is a tranny. The document always refers to them as "boys"

And wtf is wrong with him? Even my broke grandparents managed to get a bed for each of their children (But then my grandfather didn't hate his children)


For someone who claims to love his boys he doesn't even do the bare minimum. Hope he gets fucked more, those children don't deserve the cruel fate of him being their father.

 

[Hubelublub]

this is like one of the few areas where women tend to be favored

Not quite. The children are favoured.

It just so happens that it is almost always in the children's best interests to primarily be with the mother.

 

[keke]

this is like one of the few areas where women tend to be favored and honestly

This is another psy-op even women have been duped into believing. Every woman should make the effort not to repeat this lie and correct it when it crops up.

The headline is: When men pursue custody, they get it more often than not. Most of the time they just don’t fucking bother.

Men are also MORE LIKELY to get custody after being accused of abuse, including sexual abuse towards the children in question. This is because of parental alienation making headlines a couple decades ago and sticking to judges even though it’s been debunked multiple times as extremely, extremely rare and so limited it shouldn’t be even close to considered as an automatic truth—which is what judges do. They count it in their decisions by default. Domestic violence accusations will see a woman essentially laughed out of the room.

 

[crazedaze]

This is another psy-op even women have been duped into believing. Every woman should make the effort not to repeat this lie and correct it when it crops up.

The headline is: When men pursue custody, they get it more often than not. Most of the time they just don’t fucking bother.

Men are also MORE LIKELY to get custody after being accused of abuse, including sexual abuse towards the children in question. This is because of parental alienation making headlines a couple decades ago and sticking to judges even though it’s been debunked multiple times as extremely, extremely rare and so limited it shouldn’t be even close to considered as an automatic truth—which is what judges do. They count it in their decisions by default. Domestic violence accusations will see a woman essentially laughed out of the room.

It's really fucking ridiculous. Moids are favored in every way at all times, even and especially the courts. The courts are patriarchy incarnate as are cops. Fuck off with that bullshit
Judges will force the kids to see their rapist father
Moids are not oppressed, and any of them who even hints that they are deserves the fucking wall

 

[nothing outside the text]

I still think the real story here is how our court systems are set up against rape victims as a default.

As Catherine MacKinnon observed ages ago “rape, from women’s point of view, is not prohibited; it is regulated.”

The French language live tweets of the court proceedings are invaluable for their unvarnished and uncensored coverage. Would highly recommend.

Any particular accounts you'd recommend?

Meanwhile, the WHT is debating the ontological validity of being raped. The dudes in our own community, men I've come to respect, just don't accept that men can force themselves on women and do. I appreciate Null for pushing back even a teeny bit but it's baffling. How does someone so clearly aware of all the advantages they have on women, and also acknowledges their grudge against women in general, and their entitlement to commit SA, also disbelieve women's reports of SA when it happens?

Certain men find it very convenient to believe that women are incapable of being raped because they firmly believe all women “want it” all the time. No argument can convince them otherwise; they will just simply twist reality to suit their narrative. As Dworkin neatly put it:

The belief is that the female wants to be hurt. The belief is that the female likes to be forced. The proof that she wants it is everywhere: the way she dresses; the way she walks; the way she talks; the way she sits; the way she stands; she was out after dark; she invited a male friend into her house; she said hello to a male neighbor; she opened the door; she looked at a man; a man asked her what time it was and she told him; she sat on her father's lap; she asked her father a question about sex; she got into a car with a man; she got into a car with her best friend's father or her uncle or her teacher; she flirted; she got married; she had sex once with a man and said no the next time; she is not a virgin; she talks with men; she talks with her father; she went to a movie alone; she took a walk alone; she went shopping alone; she smiled; she is home alone, asleep, the man breaks in, and still, the question is asked, "Did you like it? Did you leave the window open just hoping that someone would pop on through? Do you always sleep without any clothes on? Did you have an orgasm?"

Denying rape as a real risk for women has no downside to a male, but a lot of advantages.

It’s also very advantageous in a sense that if women can’t be raped, then nothing one may have done to a woman constitutes a rape. Eases the conscience somewhat, I’d imagine.

 

[Kiwisee]

This is another psy-op even women have been duped into believing. Every woman should make the effort not to repeat this lie and correct it when it crops up.

The headline is: When men pursue custody, they get it more often than not. Most of the time they just don’t fucking bother.

Men are also MORE LIKELY to get custody after being accused of abuse, including sexual abuse towards the children in question. This is because of parental alienation making headlines a couple decades ago and sticking to judges even though it’s been debunked multiple times as extremely, extremely rare and so limited it shouldn’t be even close to considered as an automatic truth—which is what judges do. They count it in their decisions by default. Domestic violence accusations will see a woman essentially laughed out of the room.

Not to power level too hard, but I know from observation that having no father is better than being forced to be around an abusive one. The kids who weren’t forced to be in the same vicinity as their crack head schizo dads were better off than the ones forced to.

Every single Moid I’ve seen bitch about “parental alienation” have always been domestic abusers/mentally ill drug addicts who refuse to take any accountability for their actions leading into divorce. They never mention trying to get custody, and that’s because they know they’ve been denied for a good reason.

Remember ladies; Joshua Powell, Chris Watts and Scott Peterson were all talented at presenting themselves as family men who would do anything for their kids to outsiders. They all had enough superficial charm to hide their vices and resentment towards their wives. Those are the type of Moids who’d bitch the loudest about custody/paying child support (which is why low IQ Moids will say that paying child support is worse than murdering your wife and kids).

 

[keke]

Not to power level too hard, but I know from observation that having no father is better than being forced to be around an abusive one. The kids who weren’t forced to be in the same vicinity as their crack head schizo dads were better off than the ones forced to.

True. This reminds me of the many stories I read in papers/magazines (back in the 2010s) of abusive men that were finally forced to leave the home which saves the children from the additional sexual abuse they were enduring but never told anyone about until late adulthood. No fault divorce ensures children remain in violent households and cannot escape sexual abuse. Abuse coincides with many different forms and it’s just another way for men to control women and children as slaves.

 

[Galaxolotl]

A violent, manipulative, drug addicted moid killed himself & his daughter the same day a court granted him access to her.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14100687/Kobi-Shepherdson-inquest.html

 

[soft breathing]

A violent, manipulative, drug addicted moid killed himself & his daughter the same day a court granted him access to her.

Why the fuck did he have unsupervised visitation rights if he was known to be violent & drug addicted? What the fuck.

 

[Elysian]

Why the fuck did he have unsupervised visitation rights if he was known to be violent & drug addicted? What the fuck.

Bong judges.