- Joined
- Jan 28, 2018
I always think it's inspiring how kde and gnome are united by their hate for all users
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you're thinking because "le mossad", this isn't a good argument.We should have moved in a direction that has your system scan all your files and build a database of their contents? Yeah no
The other competition is COSMIC, which might get good in 2.0.However bad KDE might be, its primary competition is Gnome.
That's all I'm sayin'.
Not an index of your files' contents..?What do you think a journaled file system is?
A (journaling) file system does not read the contents of your files and build an index from that.nigger how do you think a file system works
>le database okayIf you're thinking because "le mossad", this isn't a good argument.
Tons of computers run databases. Your phone apps most likely use sqlite for a few things because it's small and easily embedded.
Organization of files is a good thing and makes applications like krunner for example more performant.
> caring about reactionsThis is false and it got 5 updoots. This thread is filled with retards goodbye
Not like the quality went down considering they were all wrong> caring about reactions
> quadposting
> chimps out and announces their departure
you sure showed them
Search for "Unwatch" and click the button.How do I turn off notifications from this thread
I sure do. Fucking nepomuk.KDE hasn't krashed for me since switching months ago
You guys don't remember semantic desktop
That was a feature called @Trombonista, but it was retired a few months back.Also I swear kiwifarms used to auto-merge posts to get around the awkward multi-quote implementation
I mean mentions sorrySearch for "Unwatch" and click the button.
Did they really do all that merging manually? Should've been paidThat was a feature called @Trombonista, but it was retired a few months back.
What makes you say this? I think it sounds like an awful idea even without performance issues. Perhaps it could have worked if it was first shilled today with a local llm implementation. I'd still rip it outit should be something implemented in the underlying file system itself that services can poke onto
I honestly don't understand how filesystems are such unmitigated crap in the Year of Our Lord 2026.MS came pretty close, with the database-as-filesystem concept in Longhorn, but that got thrown out with everything else when they rebased onto Server 2003.
You said you were leaving this thread.Did they really do all that merging manually? Should've been paid
What makes you say this? I think it sounds like an awful idea even without performance issues. Perhaps it could have worked if it was first shilled today with a local llm implementation. I'd still rip it out
Few people want to work on something that's technical, dry, OS-specific, nukes your data if you make a mistake, and will be adopted by nobody for ages because of #4. Remember how long it took for ext4 to be adopted? Compression is in a similar boat, but that at least has mega corporations willing to spend money on 5% improvements.I honestly don't understand how filesystems are such unmitigated crap in the Year of Our Lord 2026.
>le database okay
Yes, yes. Anyway, in case you also managed to miss it, I am talking about the scanning of all your files' contents = I don't want that. I'm surprised this thread is so combative and (judging by the first three replies) clueless.
Don’t waste your time on that retard.View attachment 9610227
Yes i know what you meant, I know how these systems work
I know what things like baloo do. And how they improve the performance of applications like krunner.
I know that for example it might grab picture metadata and then said metadata can be used for all sorts of things. Including and not limited to krunner.
You can turn it off but you're just making your experience worse.
Nigger you need to calm down, this is the Kiwi Farms. Every thread is filled with retards, your expectation for others' conduct/patience/accuracy is unreasonable. Make your point and fuck off, you're not going to get a professional response by running your mouth. Doesn't matter if you're right.This is false and it got 5 updoots. This thread is filled with retards goodbye
I'd like to let you all know that kiwi tards took that long ass message I just copy pasted from @The Mighty Bundu 's shitpost seriously
To clarify, the point is a FLAT filesystem. It's more transparent and needs less infrastructure: no sql client, no (additional) always-on background services, no vendor/application-specific access methods. It tends to work across Operating Systems via standard tools (if drivers permit) without even trying.I mean, that's basically what a filesystem is already.
iOS used semantic desktop concepts to abstract from the underlying filesystem. The "Files" app presents folders and textfiles which are all just database entries.semantic desktop is cool and the direction computers should have moved in instead of gay touch devices that don't even let you see the filesystem.
Application-specific databases are reasonable.Tons of computers run databases. Your phone apps most likely use sqlite for a few things because it's small and easily embedded.
Organization of files is a good thing and makes applications like krunner for example more performant.
find /usr/share/applications/ -iname "*query*.desktop" as the same search is near instant.It would help if your didn't create a new notification with your quoting, unless you're muted.You said you were leaving this thread.
GTFO already, retard.
Sorry for roping you into this. Didn't expect the thread to blow up.How do I turn off notifications from this thread
I like to explore the extremes of positions I consider, and the file system can be considered an unhappy medium. Forths usually have no file system, and instead expose a block abstraction. It's hard to call that heavyweight, but a file system is certainly heavyweight in comparison. There are plenty of papers, including one by the SQLite guys, showing how databases can be faster. This wouldn't be possible were the file system truly lightweight, but such is possible because it's not.It's more transparent and needs less infrastructure
1234567890__long_filename_structure.type => 12/34/56/78/1234567890__long_filename_structure.type
This is just a way of saying it works where it works. I couldn't care less about compatibility with DOS, yet that's what we've got to a degree.It tends to work across Operating Systems via standard tools (if drivers permit) without even trying.
Cue Rob Pike's pathetic thoughts on this matter:iOS used semantic desktop concepts to abstract from the underlying filesystem. The "Files" app presents folders and textfiles which are all just database entries.
true program was an empty file on some systems, which happened to produce the desired result—and how it no longer worked after it was documented. Typeless files suck in the same way stateless protocols suck, they deny reality: Files clearly have types, and certain protocols clearly have state, so designing without these in mind produces worse results. Anyway, I love how Multics did all of this and more better, but he only speaks about UNIX here.UNIX weenies always use the example of grep. They masturbate over grep. BurntSushi is a celebrity in the Rust world for writing a grep, but in Rust. They're obsessed with this utterly unimpressive program, it's pathetic. Castrate them, that is turn them into eunuchs, and the first thing they'll do after the screaming is grep for their balls.Rob Pike said:You can't grep a spreadsheet or put a PDF into your Photos app
Yes, and when something is reasonable for one program, perhaps a generalization would be good for more programs. Consider the sentence "Application-specific file systems are reasonable." as an argument against a file system provided in the operating system. That seems silly, right?Application-specific databases are reasonable.
I love the idea of tiling window managers like hyprland because they scratch that early 2000s "im in" stereotype, but any time i look into them, all the configuration and not having a "start menu" is a massive turn off that not even the visual appeal of being able to live out the dream of being an early 2000s hacker can fix.I would use something like hyprland, but I don't like tiling window managers, I have a config ready, I just really like complete desktops like KDE.
I've gotten so used to not having one that having a Windows start menu feels foreign to me. I've used MacOS and Gnome/Hyprland for way too long that I hold Super + Holding LMB on windows to shift them around and then get confused when it doesn't work on Windows itself.and not having a "start menu"
what i mean is shit like this looks coolI've gotten so used to not having one that having a Windows start menu feels foreign to me. I've used MacOS and Gnome/Hyprland for way too long that I hold Super + Holding LMB on windows to shift them around and then get confused when it doesn't work on Windows itself.