Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Is it not more likely that there is an actual customer who identified as Pat to the swatter and proceeded to scam him?

I know Pat is fat and stupid, but stupid enough to identify himself to a person he is paying to break the law seems a little bit too good to be true.
But it could also be the case that Pat tried to hide his identity but had shit opsec and the swatter was able to identify him regardless 🤔
 
I know Pat is fat and stupid, but stupid enough to identify himself to a person he is paying to break the law seems a little bit too good to be true.
He is that dumb. We're talking about a man who built a fence backwards. A man who texted death threats to someone then tried to take out a restraining order on them. A man who decided to sue 60 John Does on the internet who called him fat. I could go on...

However, it could still be a gayop.
 
Is it not more likely that there is an actual customer who identified as Pat to the swatter and proceeded to scam him?

I know Pat is fat and stupid, but stupid enough to identify himself to a person he is paying to break the law seems a little bit too good to be true.
It's either this, or pat was actually retarded enough to scam this guy and ended up his number one target. It has to be one or the other I'm convinced of it. It makes too much sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock
Pat may have been a customer the swat telegram just posted this
Archived using rss shit couldn't do it other way fuck telegram: https://archive.is/hX5Ld
channel: https://t.me/swatsontelegram
View attachment 5045880
edit: what the channel looked like before "on hiatus"
View attachment 5045912
Screenshot_20230413-201234.png
 
It’s possibly too good to be true. But it also makes a lot of sense. The amount of swattings is absolutely ludicrous and nonsensical. And Fatrick almost gleefully updates his audience without fail. It’s drumming up potential support and he’s probably been panicking because the walls are closing in with paying Quasi.

If you think he isn’t above this you don’t know Pat. He’s a chronic delusional liar and mentally ill.

I await with baited breath for more developments in this arc. If he gets caught swatting himself I may spontaneously jizz my trousers.
 
It’s possibly too good to be true. But it also makes a lot of sense. The amount of swattings is absolutely ludicrous and nonsensical. And Fatrick almost gleefully updates his audience without fail. It’s drumming up potential support and he’s probably been panicking because the walls are closing in with paying Quasi.

If you think he isn’t above this you don’t know Pat. He’s a chronic delusional liar and mentally ill.

I await with baited breath for more developments in this arc. If he gets caught swatting himself I may spontaneously jizz my trousers.
Additionally, he wasn't swatted once during his two week Mexican excursion. This revelation really gets the noggin joggin...
 
I get the ethical struggle people have with accepting dox as a fact of the site, but cataloging and discussing people can't really work if you can't talk about factual or speculative information tied to their identities. "Just remove the dox" isn't going to satisfy the cows complaining; they don't actually care. They just want the site gone and dox is an easy thing to get victim points. "What is dox?" can't be easily answered so it can't be policed. Most people probably think phone numbers and addresses, but the most basic dox is as simple as linking a legal name to a pseudonymous username. That's pretty much a fundamental aspect of the site, especially for those catalogued here who are more in line with vile criminals than just silly funny autists. Once you know a name everything else pretty much comes with it.

If you want some insight into how policing dox when discussing internet people is a losing proposition, just look at poast and their no dox rule. They can't seem to apply the rule in a consistent and logical way. Things that are dox or not dox seem to just be down to the mod's mood swings. Ultimately the rules against it just end up causing a whole lot of fighting and drama among the users. You can't control other peoples' actions and they'll be abusive if they want. Playing "Janny hide the phone number" won't change that. It might work for a knitting forum, but a gossip forum needs to be able to gossip.
Yeah i guess doxxing is kinda a broad term, but that doesnt mean specific things cant be policed. Knowing someones real name is one thing. BBut its not the same as posting their phone number or there passwords, i dont see how thats relevant to gossip about drama.
The other thing is that a bunch of users have the mentality that they are crusaders fighting those aforementioned vile criminals, its contradictory to the point of a gossip forum. And when you have a cows address laying around they can become poop touchers.
 
Last edited:
I just had a thought, wouldn't this also explain why patrick addresses every text and tweet as if they are the same stalker child person? He KNOWS that there is only one individual responsible for his swattings, how would he know that if he wasn't directly involved with the very sole said person responsible for said swattings?
 
Back