Patrick W. Gilmore (he/him) is a fan of censorship of the internet - Also allegedly a massive sucker of tranny cock

[Dyn]

I'm not the person who was asserting that we were doing something illegal. I'm just saying that trying to use their physical address to stop them from "[hiding] behind anonymity" doesn't make any sense. If you're not harassing them, then what would they be hiding from? It's not like this site has an e-police force or more than a few thousand people read this site.

It's just generally considered to be best doxing practice to compile all the information we have. If we have an address, a phone number, an old deviantart profile, we'll include it, regardless of what it is. You're right that street addresses usually don't make a difference, but occasionally it turns out to be the key piece of information that links somebody to a previous legal name, or sometimes they just have a really messy front yard we can make bitchy comments about.

 

[Oddjob OTP]

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2.
Step 3. Unethical behavior of subject is ceased

What's step 2?

Your step 3 is incorrect so why would we come up for a step 2 to reach your step 3. This is a site to laugh at retards on the internet, not to reform or punish them.

 

[Burd Turglar]

Lol this dude spends a disturbing amount of time on Quora. One of these days he'll find the answer on how to get him mom stuck in the dryer.

Iykyk.

 

[Dyn]

Your step 3 is incorrect so why would we come up for a step 2 to reach your step 3. This is a site to laugh at retards on the internet, not to reform or punish them.

To be fair we did step 3 some of the folks in animal control.

 

[Burd Turglar]

To be fair we did step 3 some of the folks in animal control.

The fact that kiwifarms is directly responsible for pedophiles, zoophiles, necro-zoos and monkey torturers being arrested is just proof that this site is a far right, nazi site. How dare you filthy basement dwellers kink shame.

 

[Oddjob OTP]

To be fair we did step 3 some of the folks in animal control.

And we'll fucking do it again.

 

[Dyn]

The fact that kiwifarms is directly responsible for pedophiles, zoophiles, necro-zoos and monkey torturers being arrested is just proof that this site is a far right, nazi site. How dare you filthy basement dwellers kink shame.

Yeah it's basically swatting when you think about it.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

I think the real question that should be asked is that if there really should be a correlation between pro-censorship Internet people and constant conversations with Internet furries. Maybe it’s me, but this is not the first time where I’ve seen someone wanting a certain site like this taken down on the web, and it’s always done by a person who ends up being a furry or associating with furries.

Has there ever been a study done as to why this keeps happening?

 

[Canned Ham]

https://twitter.com/PatrickWGilmore/status/1454858285081939975

https://archive.vn/wip/DU5LS

 

[Burd Turglar]

Yeah it's basically swatting when you think about it.

swatting with extra steps

 

[Smaug's Smokey Hole 2]

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2.
Step 3. Unethical behavior of subject is ceased

What's step 2?

Why would anyone want them to cease their behavior? This isn't retard rehab.

Step 1. You know someone's real name and address and other people do to.
Step 2. It can be matched up to their wild tranny tales of woe and poverty, like paying absurd amounts of cash for getting tendies delivered to the door because they live in a "food desert" and doesn't have a car. That's why people need to donate to their patreon/gfm/whatever.
Step 3. Laugh because the cows front door can be seen from the tendie place, something that can be confirmed with street view thanks to having their address. This exposes the grift.

 

[Marvin]

I don't disagree. The question remains, what is the practical purpose of posting someone's address publicly? What is the intended outcome?

There's a difference between trying to incite targeted harassment IRL and trying to make someone generally notorious.

I wouldn't want people to show up to someone's house and harass them. However, with some of these people, I would like them to be generally notorious as shitheads or losers by their community.

And any kind of personal information, including addresses, is helpful for that purpose.

For example, Tony Reed. There's several Anthony Reeds in Maryland around the same age. Probably quite a few Erin Reeds too. Narrowing down the address and other personal information was important to identify the specific one.

So nowadays, if you work in the DC area and get an email from a colleague from "erin reed", you can go "lol, is that fucking tony?" and you have the information available to figure out if it's actually him or if it's just a coincidence.

It's actually fairly rare for anyone to act out on this information. Personally I see all kinds of weirdos and trannies on social media. Some in my area. I've giggled at them and looked them up, but never contacted them or approached them. Honestly I don't want to get into some weird argument on the street with an unhinged internet personality. You'll find that most people really try to avoid unnecessary conflict.

If you come to this site expecting to be able to post someone's personal information and have them actually harassed IRL, you're really misinformed. No one does that.

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Don't like it? Build your own tier 1 ISP.

 

[Kendall Motor Oil]

phone books would be illegal. The Whitepages would be illegal.

Ancestry.com would be illegal.
Court record aggregation companies would be illegal.
Tow truck and police car license plate camera databases you can pay to access would be illegal.(And probably should be illegal)
All the background check websites would be illegal.
Faggots like this guy know this and I'd wager he's a spoiled child living in an area that is much nicer than 90%+ of the country... and probably a lot whiter.

Social media would have to tard wrangle people into not posting personal info because we have seen said tards cry people looked at their posts much like how some scantily clad women get upset when ugly men oggle them.

So nowadays, if you work in the DC area and get an email from a colleague from "erin reed", you can go "lol, is that fucking tony?" and you have the information available to figure out if it's actually him or if it's just a coincidence.

Big tech is incestuous. People talk. You can get a reputation over there and become un-hireable. It's different when they communicate via back channels because they are better than you. Them working in FAANG is proof enough.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

I remember going to school with Patrick W. Gilmore.

Even back then, he was always on that pronoun shit. Never knew anyone else who did it and all the other kids thought he was stuck up his own ass for it. But I remember once sitting in the cafeteria during breakfast and I had brought a Poptart with me. I had taken one bite out of the thing when he moseyed on up and asked me if he could have some of it. He snatched it out of my hands before I could say no. But before he took a bite out of it, he pulled a packet of mustard out of his pocket and squeezed its yellow goo all over my fucking pastry. Then, while it was still moist with my spittle, he eats the thing in front of horrified onlookers. He stuffs it all in his mouth and with full cheeks, he looks at me and says "Could've used some mayonnaise."

 

[Tamara Knight]

Ancestry.com would be illegal.
Court record aggregation companies would be illegal.
Tow truck and police car license plate camera databases you can pay to access would be illegal.(And probably should be illegal)
All the background check websites would be illegal.
Faggots like this guy know this and I'd wager he's a spoiled child living in an area that is much nicer than 90%+ of the country... and probably a lot whiter.

Honestly don't know enough about how ancestry.com works to give an opinion.

People who have been charged with a crime having their addresses published is quite a bit different than a random person you don't like who hasn't committed a crime having their information published.

Fuck tow truck companies (but that's its own discussion)

Background check websites are unnecessary middlemen. Offender data (of people tried and convicted in court) should be publicly accessible to everyone on a .gov domain. Again not the same as being able to look up a random person you don't like

"If you care about privacy you're a faggot." Posted under an anonymous account from a VPN.

Patrick W. Gilmore hasn't done anything except be an annoying libtard with a correct interpretation of the 1st ammendment. ISPs have no legal obligation to host content they don't like. Do I agree with that? No. But that's what you get with American-style Libertarianism. Build your own platform.

 

[DavidS877]

Patrick W. Gilmore hasn't done anything except be an annoying libtard with a correct interpretation of the 1st ammendment. ISPs have no legal obligation to host content they don't like.

Why do you trolls keep bringing up the First Amendment?

This is about a state law saying that businesses in that state providing Internet access cannot block legal content.

If it applies to IncogNET and the relation to their upstream is really the only open question.

 

[Fastest Hand In The East]

what a collosal faggot, hope he gets anus cancer

 

[Raw Onion Enjoyer]

You can't just go around posting people's addresses if they haven't listed them. Even some antifa accounts have been banned for doxing minor alt right personalities.

You just exposed yourself as a leftie based on this post alone. No one says "alt right" except lefties. It's a media created boogeyman for freaks like you. The reason you have such a problem with posting addresses is that you are projecting your leftie tendencies onto us. You also have a female name "Tamara" in your username. And you've been crying about anti-semitism lol. My diagnosis: a neurotic tranny jew. You really can't stop subverting, can you?

 

[Tamara Knight]

You just exposed yourself as a leftie based on this post alone. No one says "alt right" except lefties. It's a media created boogeyman for freaks like you. The reason you have such a problem with posting addresses is that you are projecting your leftie tendencies onto us. You also have a female name "Tamara" in your username. And you've been crying about anti-semitism lol. My diagnosis: a neurotic tranny jew. You really can't stop subverting, can you?

Richard Spencer coined the term, moron. He even founded a website called altright.com, you may have heard of it. Tamara Knight is a pun from James Bond. And "you want people to be honest about their intentions, therefore you're a tranny Jew" is pure schizophrenia. The point I was making is that the media is heavily biased towards antifa generally, and the media still doesn't let them dox people. Even right wing political dissidents. So the claim that KF isn't doing anything different than other sites is absurd.