Personality Assessment System - What if MBTI, but glowie?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Do you reckon all of these personality tests are just Barnum Statements over and over? For 80% of people, doesn't everyone usually stick with their own friends/maybe mutual friends, or think they deserve more respect/money/power than they have now?
 
Oh, man, I love personality-by-horoscope.
1000003646.jpg
To mold his adult personality, the [IFU] depends heavily uponthe guidance and direction of external events. Initially, he resistsauthority and direction. However, if contact is made and the initialresistance mitigated, the [IFU] is potentially very creative and veryproductive. He is not imitative, nor does he assimilate and applyinstructions in rote fashion.

Since social-interpersonal involvementis no problem for him, he expends little effort finding time forindividual or personalized activity. Initially, he is in danger ofbecoming so autistic and nonresponsive that he risks never makingcontact with reality. The [IFU] is soobviously non-responsive that rarely does he escape pressure todevelop responsiveness. Unlike the [IFA], it is very difficult for the[IFU] to cover his schizoid activity by superficial role playingability, so the pressure tends to be unrelenting and consistent. The[IFU] rarely can make a superficial social-reality adjustment; he mustconstantly prove that he is perceptive, alert and responsive. Once thecontact is established, the curiosity inherent in the [IF] adjustmentwill take over and the [IFU] will actually relate to reality eagerlyand will find considerable psychological satisfaction in hisversatility. Since a great deal of his energy is not dissipated insuperficial social relationships and since he is fairly untroubled byabsence of reciprocal emotional involvements, there is often anexcellent chance that the [IFU] individual will develop extremelyversatile and highly competent interests that have real socialrelevance. Depending upon his background and experience, these may beeither mental-intellectual activities or manual-manipulative ones. Ineither case, the [IFU] is likely to excel because he has to prove hiscompetence before he is let alone.

The [IRU] usually has to be takenstep by step because he learns by imitation and rote, but the [IFU],once he gets started, is capable of considerable imagination andself-sustained inspiration. In other words, he is capable of learningby implication, principle and insight. In fact, one of the primaryproblems of the [IFU] is that he may become so involved in theimplications and subtleties of his interests that he gets lost in hissubject at the expense of other interests. This is not the same as theperseveration of the [IRU], but in many ways the effects are similar.It is often necessary to force the [IFU] to abandon one activity foranother before he has a real sense of closure. As an adult, he isprone to become the highly specialized individual who finds greatpsychological satisfaction in exploring the nuances of his subject.

The maturation rate of the [IFU] is erratic. On the one hand, if hisintellectual curiosity is stimulated, his intellectual maturation maybe very rapid. On the other hand, social maturity for the [IFU] isprobably the slowest of any group. The combination of thepreoccupations of the [IFU], plus his own lack of need ofsocial-interpersonal interaction, plus his relative lack ofimpressionistic attractiveness, results in only slight acquisition ofsocial-interpersonal skills. To a certain extent, the inherentcreativeness and imaginativeness of the productive [IFU] leaves hiscontemporaries and authority figures in awe of his intellectuality orperformance, and they therefore tend to overlook hissocial-interpersonal immaturity. Many odd and unusual individuals comefrom this pattern, because the [IFU] generally is indifferent andinsensitive to involvement with others. This is the pattern of the"absent-minded professor," and "the long-haired intellectual." He isunconventional, not because he is defensive, self-protective ornegativistic, but because he is insulated against the need to be anydifferent. However, it should also be emphasized that since the [IFU]is so indifferent to social convention, he sometimes encountersextreme pressure for modification. Consequently, some [IFU] s becomeextremely fastidious and exact in their social behavior. Some of themost vivid social stereotypes will also come from this group.

The[IFU] begins life as behaviorally a very passive but mentally a veryactive individual. He engages in considerable spontaneous ideationalactivity. His ultimate adjustment is a function of the extent thisspontaneity is channeled and controlled. Although he has little realneed to communicate in the [E] sense, he does have considerable needto symbolize or organize the chaos of his initial mental activity.Also, he has fundamental succor dependency needs that, initially atleast, must be recognized and responded to. The "doll baby" quality ofthe [IFA] is not present in the [IFU]; thus, to a high degree, thecare and treatment of the [IFU] comes from a sense of responsibilityand duty, rather than from love and affection. He never receives thegeneralized pampering of the [IFA], but will frequently come in for aspecific type of pampering.

The task-oriented individual will find the[IFU] very responsive to direction. The same is true of the [IRU],except that the spontaneity and creativity of the [IFU] not onlyembellish and color what he learns, but will also attract theattention and devotion of those who are interested in creativeactivity. The [IRU] tends to reflect faithfully the milieu from whichhe emerges; the [IFU] is less willing to mirror his experience andthus will show more mobility and more individual preference. Forexample, in learning languages, the [IFU] does not have a compellingneed to communicate, but he does have a need to symbolize. If he growsup in an environment rich with vocabulary, he will acquire a richvocabulary. If he grows up in a culture barren in language, he willnot only learn the language required, but will also invent a languageof his own to embody the nuances he feels a need to symbolize. As avery small child, there may be some delay in learning acceptedlanguage forms because his own inventiveness may satisfy hissymbolizing need. If his mother can understand his private languageand gives him the succor dependence he needs, he may be unusually slowin learning standard language forms. Later in life, the highlyintelligent [IFU] may have considerable language or symbolic facility;this pattern produces such specialists as cryptographers andlinguists. The symbolic language of mathematics and science are alsoof particular interest to this group. In more primitive societies, the"strange tongues" of religious ecstatics and mystics may come from[IFU]'s of lower intelligence.

One of the most dramatic examples ofthe difficulties in establishing communications with an [IFU] and anequally dramatic example of the potential for communicating, onceeffective contact is made, is to be found in the life of Helen Keller.

Honestly a lot of this resonates, but, it is zodiac sign personality crap, so I'd be more surprised if it didn't.

On the one hand, this summary goes on about high intelligence, though I rarely, consistently, scored above C's on basically all schoolwork, often failing to turn it in at all. I will say it's correct in guessing that I find myself to be task-oriented, an 'ideas guy' (much to my chagrin; any fool can come up with a thought) who bounces from project to project without finishing, but I feel like that can be literally anybody. I do, however, feel I'm at my best when I'm told to go get shit done or left alone to get shit done.

I'm at my worst when I'm not making something, even if I like my veg seshes.
 
Last edited:
IRA
1766871581155.png

It might as well be cold reading with how many terms it throws around. It's the usual issue with those tests, that the questions are too broad. Easy example is that some people are better in specific social interactions, like during work or in a more leisurely locations.
 
I got IuRcUu as well but I'm too retarded to understand what that means. Probably means I'm retarded.
 
Do you reckon all of these personality tests are just Barnum Statements over and over? For 80% of people, doesn't everyone usually stick with their own friends/maybe mutual friends, or think they deserve more respect/money/power than they have now?
90% of the time, yes.
With this one, absolutely for the primitives (there's only 8 types so ofc they're casting a broad net). A bit less so for the basic. There are some specific claims made (this guy is likely aggressive, that guy's a gooner, you're an autistic alcoholic, etc.) that some people would definitely disagree with if it showed up on their profile.
Go to the list of basics and click one at random and imagine that was the profile it sent you.

In any case, don't take this shit all that seriously. It's for funzies.
 
One of the most dramatic examples of the difficulties in establishing communications with an [IFU] and an equally dramatic example of the potential for communicating, once effective contact is made, is to be found in the life of Helen Keller.
Please consult a Helen Keller biography if you need help training your IFU sleeper agent.
 
Got the delusional eccentric alcoholic like OP (IcRcUu). Honestly doesn't sound as bad as the other possible outcomes.
 
I got IuFuUu. Highly autistic schizoid who is possibly intelligent but in no useful/beneficial way.

The description got scarier and more accurate as it went on. It said "Subject is most likely to spend time shitposting on racist Internet forums."
 
It said I'm an autistic Godlike computer programmer
IRU
1766945581053.png
Overall profile: Ic Ro Uu
1766945682370.png
He is rarely an imaginative person because he guards against autistic tendencies. He is likely to be a very effective mental technician, and can be proficient in such diverse areas as physics, economics, and music theory. It is probable that some composers come from this cluster, and it is relatively certain that the best computer programmers are found here.
Yes I do program computers so I guess this part is right though I'm not really that good at it.
A primary characteristic of the e*f*u is his social-interpersonal insulation. The true e*f*u makes only the most superficial effort to develop social versatility. Shyness is often present, but in most instances, the e*f*u is actually indifferent to social pressures. Living alone, being self-sufficient and self-reliant, are non-stressful.
It's not too far off the mark. I've always lived alone when not with family and literally moved to the other side of the world where I have no family and honestly it doesn't bother me one bit. I only miss the animals.
Unlike the e*ru, [IcRuUu] who is generally self centered and immature, the e*f*u has a sense of responsibility and a genuine involvement with his interests. What he is doing is all important to him; he expects to gain security for the quality of his productivity.
I'd be curious how much "interests" can involve hobbies. It's not entirely wrong if you see how much time I waste on retarded bullshit, though I'm nowhere near as committed with real work.
He has little interest in authority or prestige positions,
Prestige positions maybe but authority absolutely not. I've always said I never want to be a manager.
As he grows older, the e*f*u becomes more delusional and an eccentric, and an although he rarely becomes a true schizophrenic, he often becomes more bizarre, eccentric, and an seclusive; most always, however, he is able to maintain himself.
I got the @Relinquish ending :lossmanjack:
 
The e*fu has reacted against his autism and behavioral passivity, has developed a sense of responsibility, and recognizes the need to sublimate or displace most of his primitive self-centeredness and emotionality. However, very little of his displacement is toward active social-interpersonal relationships; it is more likely to be individual but socially relevant intellectual and procedural activities. His need to be active in a social sense is limited, but, as a result, his vocational or avocational interests are intense and compelling. In most instances, the e*fu will approach his interests with considerable self-discipline and will be dedicated, in one way or another, to efficiency and competence. It can be expected that the e*fu will have a strong sense of duty; much of his time will be occupied with the individual development of his responsibilities. Like the other adjustments from the IFU orientation, the e*fu adjustment implies "free will" in the selection of interests. Once an e*fu has established his pattern of life, he will have little use for activities he does not understand or expect. Thus, versatility is rarely, if ever, a characteristic of the e*fu. He usually has specific, delimited interests and stubbornly becomes set in his pattern. He does not have the need of the ef*a* [EuRcUc] to involve and include others, so his proselyting characteristics are much less obvious.

Did this test just call me autistic or what? Thanks
 
Last edited:
I have to shake the Joy-con to doubt faster on this test. Comparing to the MBTI nerd horoscope and its usual 500+ questions this one seems methodologically flawed. Not only the number of questions are really low, they are very obvious and easily gamed for a "good" answer, both consciously and subconsciously and they are very repetitive and often grossly unfitting too. practically every question in every personality test has an option that makes you go "hell yeah, that is me!" and fully align with it, but not here, There were several that were so grossly unfitting, inapplicable and trying too hard to instantly categorize you through a false dichotomy that they just felt amateurish, like a psychologist on his first day, categorizing you as a gay nigger for a cigar. While I hugely respect it for not holding heckin wholesome feefees as a priority, and understand its purpose of filtering headcases out of glowie ops, many of the outcomes were overtly pathologizing too, like there are only a few that could be taken as neutral or lukewarmly positive, most of them categorizes people as various schizos, who would by definition, not take tests until forced to. A sort of anti-barnum effect even.

But the really damning thing for me was the lack of convergence. I've been taking these tests for decades now, sometimes administered in professional environments, MBTI, Big Five, Hexaco and so on, and they have remarkably converged on the same traits, there is a consilience that I'm an ENTJ/INTJ (depending on the mood, probably just on the border) ADHD nigger who falls into several extreme outliers, like bottom 5% neuroticism, top 5% openness to experience, bottom 5% of schizotypy and so on. I could be sad about a relative dying, held at gunpoint in a dungeon or woken up the middle of the night and would display the same, innate traits. But this test taken a several times over the past few days NEVER returned the same result twice, but random hits all over the place. It seems like statistical noise to me with little value.

Also, some questions, especially the ones trying to resolve childhood socializing, might be GROSSLY inapplicable for other cultures and their expectations. Many of them express different values and very different presentations, on several spectrums, causing severe mismatch. Like, your average east yuro or finn or whatever would be taken as a bitter cold asshole, a real brusque, standoffish, antisocial retard in any latin-american country, just for expressing the values about social distancing they were raised in and deem absolutely normal. There is this amazing quote about it,

Attempts to replicate the Big Five in other countries with local dictionaries have succeeded in some countries but not in others. Apparently, for instance, Hungarians do not appear to have a single agreeableness factor.[169]
 
Fellow INTJ here.... Are we officially considered the equivalent of Hitler?
I don’t think it’s a big group, and it’s mainly men.
I dont know, but whenever I’ve been forced to do this stuff at work people get annoyed at me.
I have had to do I think four different ones, including this one and an MBTI and there was one where it was measuring your ability to lead and dominate. I got placed first out of fifty people including the management and they all started sulking. It was very, very peculiar. I suppose it’s like if the girl who cleans the office aces you in an IQ test or something for the kind of person who lives on LinkedIn and DOMINATES THE SPACE WITH SYNERGISTIC LEADERSHIP or some bollocks
It’s all just astrology for business wankers.
 
Back
Top Bottom