Polyamory General - Polyamory drama from Facebook, Reddit, and more

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ICametoLurk said:
lol
View attachment 305047

LMFAO
View attachment 305048
Click to expand...
What the ACTUAL FUCK? At least the OP in this one called themselves autistic, so I don't have to. But seriously, WHAT? Why is it hard to understand that your partner, a rape victim, would take issue with you dating a rapist? Furthermore, why would you still want to be with someone after they admit to being a rapist? Jesus Christ, autism truly knows no bounds.
 
Catetive said:
What the ACTUAL FUCK? At least the OP in this one called themselves autistic, so I don't have to. But seriously, WHAT? Why is it hard to understand that your partner, a rape victim, would take issue with you dating a rapist? Furthermore, why would you still want to be with someone after they admit to being a rapist? Jesus Christ, autism truly knows no bounds.
Click to expand...
It gets better, I only took one-half of the OP.
upload_2017-10-29_20-41-40.png

Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/polyamory/..._love_with_a_rapist_and_my_partner_is_a_rape/
Archive: http://archive.is/Y2ws9
 
Last edited:
DNA_JACKED said:
ADVANCED UBER-CUCK. I dont want to believe someone could be that pathetic, but then again this has been a surprising year.
Click to expand...
its a greentext. you can rest assured knowing it is completely truthful. to be able to write a greentext all facts are verified to a team of nuns who patrol the internet 24/7 to confirm all statements submitted in greentext format. source: penis inspection day
 
They have a discord, and for the love of all fuck don't go and tell them that we are watching their discord like what happened with r/zoophilia
 
Last edited:
Whooo boy. Polyamory.
I'm gonna have to echo @Vrakks here and say the idea of polyamory being placed on the same pedestal as real relationships disturbs me for reasons I can't quite define. I mean, one of the points of long-term relationships or marriages is that you're effectively saying to your partner, I love you so much that I want to spend my life with you and only you. You're meant to have a bond with them that can't be duplicated with anyone else. Maybe it doesn't work out like that all the time in the real world, but it's still what should be aimed for.

I've known a polyamorous group. What irked me the most about them is just how much their lives revolved around their polyamory. Every conversation would inevitably turn to "Well, my partner's boyfriend..." And there was this one poor sad sack who clearly didn't want to be polyamorous, but was also still clearly so under the thumb of his girlfriend that he couldn't say no to her. Eventually the whole thing fell apart when someone started sleeping with someone who wasn't part of the "gang".
 
Map of some reddit members
goo.gl/Rqy9yJ

I did Google URL shortner so that if they googled it they would find it.
 
Catetive said:
3cbdac3287f03690f0a9e8e30511ed90.png

Man, the poor husband.
This is just a hive of degeneracy and cuckoldry.
Click to expand...

Why even get married in the first place if you're just going to easily disregard what the other person is feeling? Also I can tell she wants more from C but C doesn't from her. Like she wants to date him or something because she gives an awful lot of excuses for his awful behavior. Her husband should divorce her tbh because C won't commit to her and she sounds like a teenage girl that just realized hot guys are hot.
 
:optimistic: I honestly don't see the harm in poly relationships so long as everyone involved is OK with it, but so many of these people blatantly use it as a crutch for their sexual and emotional hang-ups it's not even funny. You've got people jumping between partners when there's any sort of conflict, refusing to reflect on why they can't develop a meaningful relationship as resentment starts building on all sides, and then you've got the people who act like it's empowering to move from bed to bed like they're Third-wave Goldilocks. You wanna bang multiple people, whatever, you do you, but don't act like you're so ~enlightened~ and open-minded when you're too emotionally stunted to maintain a relationship with one person, much less five. I think poly relationships can work, but it takes a lot more emotional maturity than I'm seeing here.

(Also these screenshots are simultaneously the most pathetic and hilarious things I've seen in a while jesus christ.)
 
Autismo Pinochet said:
My understanding is that "Polyamory" is a politically correct term for Consentual Cuckoldry?
Click to expand...

Kind of. A lot of poly relationships are very one-sided, with one person wanting to fuck other people without ending the relationship, and the other agrees because they don't want to rock the boat.

A major fallacy among poly people is that sex isn't that big of a deal. It's just 'insert tab A into slot B, feel good'. The corollary to this is that people can voluntarily control their emotions when it comes to sex, i.e., "We've agreed this is casual sex, so as long as we decide not to develop feelings, we won't." "Sex is just a physical activity, so adding it to our dating/friendship won't change our relationship." "My partner promised not to feel jealous because I'm not monogamous, but they're betraying me by feeling jealousy anyway!" In these situations, the first person to get emotional "loses", as the other simply states that they're the rational one in the relationship, therefore they win. This goes over about as well as you expect.

There's also a wide streak of hipster-ism in sex, where the weirder you are, the cooler you are. Geeks have a tendency to mistake "less mainstream" for "better," and to conclude that sex that least resembles the mainstream is both the sexiest and the most virtuous. So polyamory gets seen as more enlightened than monogamy, kink gets seen as sexier than vanilla, and monogamous vanilla geeks get a big steaming pile of "I guess you're just not very open-minded," and labeled a no-funster. Drama ensues.
 
Papa Nier said:
:optimistic: I honestly don't see the harm in poly relationships so long as everyone involved is OK with it, but so many of these people blatantly use it as a crutch for their sexual and emotional hang-ups it's not even funny. You've got people jumping between partners when there's any sort of conflict, refusing to reflect on why they can't develop a meaningful relationship as resentment starts building on all sides, and then you've got the people who act like it's empowering to move from bed to bed like they're Third-wave Goldilocks. You wanna bang multiple people, whatever, you do you, but don't act like you're so ~enlightened~ and open-minded when you're too emotionally stunted to maintain a relationship with one person, much less five. I think poly relationships can work, but it takes a lot more emotional maturity than I'm seeing here.

(Also these screenshots are simultaneously the most pathetic and hilarious things I've seen in a while jesus christ.)
Click to expand...

I have to politely disagree. I remember a lot of similar posts about how polyamory 'could work' in the beginning of the Jake Rapp thread, and alot of those posts referenced the need for 'both partners to be okay with it' and for both to have 'emotional maturity'. To be perfectly honest though, I don't think you can just hand wave away the issues polyamory causes with 'emotional maturity'. Although evolutionary psychology is controversial, its reasonable to suspect humans are predisposed to monogamy by evolution. All over the world, even in sparsely contacted amazon tribes and obscure african pygmy societies there are monogamous relationships and families. That doesn't mean monogamy is perfect or faultless, but it obviously isn't just a cultural gimmick. In the 1960s people had the idea that they'd create 'free love' communes where anyone could love anyone, but there are countless stories of those same communes collapsing from jealousy. I think I see where you're coming from but I just don't think people are blank slates that can 'learn' to break their inner nature, no matter how mature they are emotionally.
 
Jaimas said:
I have never known a single individual who advocated poly relationships that wasn't at least showing signs of outright lolcowdom.
Click to expand...
yea and it changes people. like here, ill grab this again because i think its kinda relevant

upload_2017-10-30_0-33-48.png


This idiot is basically saying "force this asshole on a date with you because you'll make them trust you". Textbook grooming. Then you consider hatching theory, and basically you come to understand that the prevalence of trans people in society is based on easily manipulated people being groomed by predators, the manipulated morons learning the behavior of the predators as normal behavior among open, enlightened minds, and then the cycle recurses. its p sick tbh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom