It looks like word stems are supported but the demo isn't set up to use it. Might be a memory issue if it's served all on-page.
Nintendo's been doing this a while at least in the west through the help of branches like the treehouse. Since they're explicitly a company mostly trying to sell to children this could be effective to add. Of course, hard to actually get people to boycott them but it would be useful to spread this information. They aren't the only other company pulling this body type thing though.
From what I understand they have shifted this direction as well in the 'localization' of some of their titles.
like the shinigami eyes extension?
Post a link else people will think we're making shit up.
Don't forget the logos, some normies can't spell a brand but would recognize the logo anywhere.
Good idea but it wouldn't last a second on the browser stores and installing it would not only be a chore for most normies but knowing google and mozilla they might go as far as remotely disabling those extensions if possible.
Elasticsearch is extreme overkill for this purpose, and wouldn't make sense with a client based dataset. You can solve it with a .filter on the list in js along with debouncing for optimization. You can also query for word stems with 'like' in sql
It's something that happened before. We had the experience with AdNauseam that was not only removed from the extension stores but also flagged as harmful, which necessitated to deactivate an option in the hidden about;config page IIRC.
The tranny part is cut out. Some lesbian group posted a picture on Twitter, and then another one Null mentioned on his podcast have done this.
Google Chrome is rolling out a new version of their extension format which specifically kneecaps ad blockers. More to the point though, they have an official extensions marketplace. Average users aren't going to find an extension outside of that; those who do will be warned several times that installing it could make their computer spontaneously combust.
Looks good already, though I'm curious how you're handling the Companies page and the Alternatives page. Will they be organized or grouped up at all? Will alternatives be linked directly to within articles or will you need to try and search the alternatives page for the type of service or company you're looking for?
honestly you can take the same data, slime it up a bit, and make a strong 'pro trans' website that would be harder to attack
Gays against groomers sounds about as realistic as Jews against compound interest. I sometimes feel like I'm going mad that everyone has forgotten that fags reproduce via molestation simply because trans want to actually butcher kids. Homos are still terrible for that shit and everyone knows it.
It's a classic gambit. Here's my favourite example of that.
If you want something easy, choose MongoDB. You can learn it in an hour and it's very forgiving. Kinda like perl in that you don't have to declare a variable type, it works it out from context.
I think the size/complexity of the dataset makes search better suited to a backend application. You've got relationships, tagging, potentially large writeups (similar to thread OPs, maybe) that all need to be considered and that's more complex than just word stems.
