Pyrocynical / Niall Comas - Inflation / Furshit / Weird Allegations


Turkey's response basically what I've been saying ever since Pyro's response that he has framed the situation in a manipulative way so his drone fans will ignore the fact that he definitively sent porn to a minor and has never proved that he didn't know ivory was 15 (sorry Pyro you saying I DID NAWT I DID NAWT is not iron clade proof across screenshots). Pyro trying to frame RP and porn as "not sexual" when it clearly is ect. The wider community will definitley ignore this as Pyro is more popular and frame it as "Tom lied and pyro is just werid" even tho pyro openly admitted to knowingly sending porn and rping to a minor.
Overall good response but there’s some points I found him faltering on on my first watch.

The messages about Ivory visiting Pyro and getting a fake ID. While Tom’s not wrong that it being a public event wouldn’t exclude the possibility of sex afterwards, doubling down on “BUT YOU COULD HAVE WANTED TO FUCK IVORY” is a terrible move because we have zero proof of Pyro’s intentions and Ivory himself said he never got the impression it was a booty call. What’s actually important about those messages is they are proof Pyro was aware of Ivory’s age at some point while suspended from Twitter which contradicts his statement that he didn’t know Ivory’s age until late June / early July. As far as I have seen this was the first time anything related to age was discussed in the DMs. Ivory’s response in the DMs was “I could sneak in there or get a fake ID because I look that age.” “In there” means Pyro must've mentioned a specific place and “that age” means Pyro must've mentioned a specific age. So we can safely assume Pyro said something to the effect of “But you wouldn’t be able to go to the club with us because you’re not 18.” This begs the question how did Pyro know in May that Ivory was under 18 if he supposedly didn’t learn Ivory’s age until he was unsuspended from Twitter in June and saw Ivory’s bio in July?

The TikTok allegations. Hyper focusing on that one piece of art is playing right into Pyro’s hand as he can now respond with “I already said I didn’t commission or request that art, and I said I'm sorry for giving any support to an underage artist drawing my character that lewdly because even as a joke it wasn't okay of me.” The allegations from Sulkaeda were not about the one drawing. The allegations were that Pyro had asked multiple times for extreme fat fetish art from an artist he knew was 15. The drawing Spoopy posted to Instagram doesn’t match the “extremely obese” description Sulkaeda gave about the kinds of art Pyro was requesting, meaning if what she’s saying is true then Pyro took things way beyond rubber stamping a body pillow gag once. If what she's saying is not true it begs the question why did Pyro skip over the actual meat of these allegations entirely and misconstrued the situation as "my detractors are flipping their shit over a single drawing because I talked to the artist once?"

Keemstar posting Pyro’s pictures. The issue Pyro had with Keem sharing photos of him back in 2016 was those specific photos were taken from his personal Facebook account which he wanted to keep separate from his YouTube persona. It wasn’t just him being mad at Keem for showing his face. Setting aside any arguments about how “private” things posted to a public website can be, that’s important context to include.
Also it makes pyro look very suspicious since he deleted the conversation about the plane ticket with Ivory.
Pyro’s messages in the plane ticket and fake ID conversation were deleted because he deleted all of his messages after April 7 2017. There’s no evidence he was singling out that conversation specifically.
There is a concept in law called "Beyond a reasonable doubt", where you need to have have proof to affirm conviction in a legal case. If you can't find a chat log of that deleted user acknowledging his age, he can explain it as 'oh I didn't see the discord message of him saying he's a minor.' Which is a reasonable doubt, like it or not.
In cases of adults having sexual interactions with minors it's not just the prosecution who has to prove the adult knew they were interacting with a minor. The adult defendant must prove they had an objectively rational reason to believe they were interacting with another adult. "He didn't tell me how old he was and I didn't ask" would fail that test.

At this point I think the bigger question to ask is, giving Pyro the benefit of the doubt about knowing Ivory's age, if he had found out Ivory was 15 when they started ERPing and sharing fetish art would he have stopped?
 
Are you willing to proclaim Pyrocynical a pedophile groomer whose relations and interaction with Ivory was for the goal of having a IRL sexual relationship with him?
Yes. I don't need any evidence to know degeneracy breeds more degeneracy. Say it's a slippery slope argument all you want. It's the truth.
 
I like Pyrocynical but I definitely think he is wrong in this situation.

1) Pyro engaged in sexual conversations with a 16-year old boy despite knowing his age.

2) Pyro invited the 16-year old to a gathering with his friends where there would be alcohol.

Again, I like Pyrocynical. I WANT him to be vindicated, but I don't see how he isn't in the wrong here.
 
I like Pyrocynical but I definitely think he is wrong in this situation.

1) Pyro engaged in sexual conversations with a 16-year old boy despite knowing his age.

2) Pyro invited the 16-year old to a gathering with his friends where there would be alcohol.

Again, I like Pyrocynical. I WANT him to be vindicated, but I don't see how he isn't in the wrong here.

The point of rather Pyro did some bad stuff is not that much questioned. Even by Pyro many times. My point is rather Pyro intentionally a pedo groomer.
 
The point of rather Pyro did some bad stuff is not that much questioned. Even by Pyro many times. My point is rather Pyro intentionally a pedo groomer.

We will never know what Pyro's intentions with Ivory were since they never met up but I think accusing him of being a groomer is fair, since he invited a kid he had previously sent sexual messages to to a party where there would be alcohol.
 
Damn, this shit is still going on?

Lmao. Here's the thing from what I see. Pyro, a pedo? No. Pyro, a groomer, purposefully trying to sexualize a kid? No. Pyro, a degenerate, gay fucktard that became so coombrained that he became unaware of the people around him and those he interacted with and thus through his coombrainedness he showed irresponsibility? Yes.
 
Damn, this shit is still going on?

Lmao. Here's the thing from what I see. Pyro, a pedo? No. Pyro, a groomer, purposefully trying to sexualize a kid? No. Pyro, a degenerate, gay fucktard that became so coombrained that he became unaware of the people around him and those he interacted with and thus through his coombrainedness he showed irresponsibility? Yes.
Pyro did sexualize a kid though. He told a kid he knew was only 16 that he wanted to have anal sex with him. Perhaps it was just role-playing but it is still sexualizing a kid regardless.
 
Pyro did sexualize a kid though. He told a kid he knew was only 16 that he wanted to have anal sex with him. Perhaps it was just role-playing but it is still sexualizing a kid regardless.
Intentionally though?

Remember this is a man so coombrained that he'll do anything sex-related regardless of the age of the person in the roleplay shit.
 
Intentionally though?

Remember this is a man so coombrained that he'll do anything sex-related regardless of the age of the person in the roleplay shit.
He knew Ivory was 16, by his own admission. Best case scenario, as far as I can tell, he is like Shmorky where he was engaging in pedophilia/ephebophilia role-play but never acted on it.
 
The point of rather Pyro did some bad stuff is not that much questioned. Even by Pyro many times. My point is rather Pyro intentionally a pedo groomer.
He isn't technically a pedophile or a groomer, but he is definitely a predator considering he talked to Ivory under his YouTube e-celeb name. Ivory was a fan of Pyrocynical, and Niall used that to get Ivory to engage in ERP. Schmorky did the exact same thing with a 16 year old girl, she was a fan of his work and wanted advice on getting into the animation business IIRC. Schmorky kept on forcing her into graphic pedophilic ERP, she eventually leaked it which was the final nail in the coffin for his dying career. My point is, Niall exploited a power dynamic to ERP with a minor, and his failed attempts at lying make it hard to trust him on anything he says.
 
He isn't technically a pedophile or a groomer, but he is definitely a predator considering he talked to Ivory under his YouTube e-celeb name. Ivory was a fan of Pyrocynical, and Niall used that to get Ivory to engage in ERP. Schmorky did the exact same thing with a 16 year old girl, she was a fan of his work and wanted advice on getting into the animation business IIRC. Schmorky kept on forcing her into graphic pedophilic ERP, she eventually leaked it which was the final nail in the coffin for his dying career. My point is, Niall exploited a power dynamic to ERP with a minor, and his failed attempts at lying make it hard to trust him on anything he says.
But Pyro didn't find some rando teen fan that he could use for ERP. IIRC, it was part of a larger RP group which Ivory willingly joined and participated with others around Pyro's age. So why call out only Pyro? Oh they're not ecelebs you can use for erroneous power dynamic arguments.
 
Dudes obviously not bothered by the fact that he's sexual with minors, in fact he kept talking to said kid. invited them to a party where they very likely would have had sex and some of Naill's friends knew this. fuck Ida straight up knew how old they where and didn't say shit if anything this is typical furfag nonsense and it's disgusting as always, Ida is GROSS, pyro is GROSS and Ivory's parents should have turned his goddamn computer off and we would never have to hear about their nasty little e-fuck fat fart sex ring
 
Last edited:
Dudes obviously not bothered by the fact that he's sexual with minors, in fact he kept talking to said kid. invited them to a party where they very likely would have had sex and some of Naill's friends knew this. fuck Ida straight up knew how old they where and didn't say shit if anything this is typical furfag nonsense and it's disgusting as always, Ida is GROSS, pyro is GROSS and Ivory's parents should have turned his goddam computer off and we would never have to hear about their nasty little e-fuck fat fart sex ring
Is a three to four year age gap problematic?
 
Is a three to four year age gap problematic?
honestly I'm more upset with Ida just sitting around with the knowledge that her friend was unknowingly engaged sexually with a minor, did the thought never cross her mind that considering the place they all met up, it might not be appropriate for them to be talking like that with an at the time 16 year old
 
But Pyro didn't find some rando teen fan that he could use for ERP. IIRC, it was part of a larger RP group which Ivory willingly joined and participated with others around Pyro's age. So why call out only Pyro? Oh they're not ecelebs you can use for erroneous power dynamic arguments.
They didn't meet in an 18+ RP server. That lie keeps getting told but there was never any evidence of that.
 
Back