feedtheoctopus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2016
In my experience most people, when you describe anarchism to them without using the scary A word, agree with it on principle if not in practice. Because really I think "we should all share what we have and take care of each other" kind of goes beyond politics, everybody on earth teaches their kids some version of that ethic. Thing is like any ideology the more hardline you are about it the dumber it gets. And one way or another nothing functions without some sort of organization, which is ironically something even most influential anarchists thinkers were well aware of (I wouldn't call anarchism anti-government at its core, it's more extremely limited and decentralized government).This ain't the 50s. Not all leftwingers are your traditional factory proletariat labor organizers.
In my experience most people who call themselves anarchists are actually leftwingers who are anticorporatist and anti traditional authority but ironically actually favor government/group coercion/jannism and social welfare leveling vs meritocracy. Thats the vibe I get from the sub for example their specific callouts in the sidebar against 'rightwing' boogeymen which is the calling card of powertripping jannies.
Most American anarchists are idiots without any nuance whatsoever so this naturally gets lost in the swirling maelstrom of their own stupidity however. That and they're all obsessed with identity bullshit and don't care about actual solutions to anything, which are usually more boring then smashing a bank window and dressing in all black because it makes you look totally badass.