- Joined
- Jun 7, 2024
Chris's case was dismissed after a differal period. In almost all of these cases the dismissal is with prejudice as the individual completed the terms of the plea bargain.
So once Chris completed the deferral period (the majority of which was spent in jail which is probably partly why he's succeeded), the charges were almost certainly dismissed with prejudice therefore unable to be recharged.
Well, I must admit I am unfamiliar with that specific phrase, most likely what we're seeing is an internal Court operation. Possibly something to do with returning his property or returning service on some sort of document. In some cases you still need to file additional paperwork to keep things sealed and Chris may have had take service of a document to do that. The deputy would then return the document and it is entered into the record. It's also possible that we are literally seeing a legal record of authorization to return his Legos.
So once Chris completed the deferral period (the majority of which was spent in jail which is probably partly why he's succeeded), the charges were almost certainly dismissed with prejudice therefore unable to be recharged.
Well, I must admit I am unfamiliar with that specific phrase, most likely what we're seeing is an internal Court operation. Possibly something to do with returning his property or returning service on some sort of document. In some cases you still need to file additional paperwork to keep things sealed and Chris may have had take service of a document to do that. The deputy would then return the document and it is entered into the record. It's also possible that we are literally seeing a legal record of authorization to return his Legos.