Containment Random Chris Updates

  • Happy Easter!
1718389027086.png

Another GFuel retweet. If only they hosted some kind of contest that Chris could join.
 
"I foreknew"

Chris mangling words again.
According to the Merriem-Webster Dictionary, it's a word.

I would have probably said something like, "I had foreknowledge of", but Chris likes his action words:

"I prophesized" "I foreknew"

Humble God as he is, it almost seems like something a small child might say to make themselves sound smarter or wiser then they are to the younger kids in their neighborhood.

You know, like that older sibling or friend who would pretend to know everything.
 
According to the Merriem-Webster Dictionary, it's a word.

I would have probably said something like, "I had foreknowledge of", but Chris likes his action words:

"I prophesized" "I foreknew"

Humble God as he is, it almost seems like something a small child might say to make themselves sound smarter or wiser then they are to the younger kids in their neighborhood.

You know, like that older sibling or friend who would pretend to know everything.

Well, guess you really do learn something new every day.

Unless you're Chris, then you don't learn anything.
 
A quick update.
Chris's case report has...Authorisation to Return It...
what the fuck does it mean?
View attachment 6088404

I found this on the VACourts website in their glossary, but I'm unsure if it is applicable here.

"Return - The act of a sheriff, constable, or other ministerial officer, in delivering back to the court a writ, notice, or other paper, which he was required to serve or execute (see EXECUTE in this Glossary), with a brief account of his doings under the mandate, the time and mode of service or execution, or his failure to accomplish it, as the case may be. Also the endorsement made by the officer upon the writ or other paper, stating what he has done under it, the time and mode of service, etc.."
 
Well, guess you really do learn something new every day.

Unless you're Chris, then you don't learn anything.
This is why any time I post something like "This isn't even a goddamn word" I look it up first. It's ridiculous how often it is, even if sometimes it's something nobody has said but some obscure poet in the 16th Century.
 
He seems to really love that shit, at least these "supreme hydration" ones are just flavored water for suckers and are not actively shortening his lifespan like all the ones with caffeine.
A quick update.
Chris's case report has...Authorisation to Return It...
what the fuck does it mean?
View attachment 6088404

No idea but if I have to guess it’s probably an internal filing process.

I strongly doubt it’s a reopening or anything like that.
 
This is why any time I post something like "This isn't even a goddamn word" I look it up first. It's ridiculous how often it is, even if sometimes it's something nobody has said but some obscure poet in the 16th Century.
I want to remind you Chris grew up and socialized around people 2-3 times as old as him, I'm sure THEIR vocabulary was vast and impressive
Chris just regularly butchers it
 
Well, guess you really do learn something new every day.

Unless you're Chris, then you don't learn anything.
You made a human mistake. You own up to it.

We can pave a road with the mistakes we'll make in a lifetime.

However, if Chris really is God and we really are made in his image, then we are fucked on the holy level.

So it's a good thing Chris isn't actually God.
 
You made a human mistake. You own up to it.

We can pave a road with the mistakes we'll make in a lifetime.

However, if Chris really is God and we really are made in his image, then we are fucked on the holy level.

So it's a good thing Chris isn't actually God.
But if Chris is God then he’s somehow managed to create life that in many ways surpasses his own which is a very impressive feat!
 
I found this on the VACourts website in their glossary, but I'm unsure if it is applicable here.

"Return - The act of a sheriff, constable, or other ministerial officer, in delivering back to the court a writ, notice, or other paper, which he was required to serve or execute (see EXECUTE in this Glossary), with a brief account of his doings under the mandate, the time and mode of service or execution, or his failure to accomplish it, as the case may be. Also the endorsement made by the officer upon the writ or other paper, stating what he has done under it, the time and mode of service, etc.."
Did they try to serve Chris with some papers or something and were unable to?

Maybe he violated some conditions.
 
Did they try to serve Chris with some papers or something and were unable to?

Maybe he violated some conditions.
Only thing I can think of is if the case was dismissed without prejudice and new evidence or statements have come to light they may reopen the case.

Could have something to do with the 14BC visit, maybe Barb got spooked, hard to say. I'm not American either so my court system knowledge is limited.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: King Kiwi
Only thing I can think of is if the case was dismissed without prejudice and new evidence or statements have come to light they may reopen the case.

I might be wrong but I thought that it was that once a case has been dismissed, that’s it.
The double jeopardy clause? One cannot be tried twice for the same crime?
That’s why a lot of US defense lawyers go for mistrial or case dismissal. It ultimately gives the same result for their client as if they were innocent.

They can get him for further motherfucking or financial abuse of her, but he has to have committed it on a different occasion.
Earlier could work if they find sufficient evidence, but usually it would be a fresh new crime.
It’s a lot easier to make it stick if they are caught doing something they were previously accused of again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ammyterasu
I might be wrong but I thought that it was that once a case has been dismissed, that’s it.
Not if it's dismissed without prejudice.
The double jeopardy clause? One cannot be tried twice for the same crime?
If it's dismissed without prejudice before trial, then obviously you haven't been tried.
 
I might be wrong but I thought that it was that once a case has been dismissed, that’s it.
The double jeopardy clause? One cannot be tried twice for the same crime?

The Virginia Supreme Court explained the distinction in Primov v. Serco, Inc., decided just a few days ago. There, the court noted that a dismissal of a suit “without prejudice” means that the court is not deciding the controversy on its merits, and that the whole subject of litigation will remain as much open to another suit as if no suit had ever been brought. (See Newberry v. Ruffin, 102 Va. 73, 76 (1903)). In other words, dismissing a case without prejudice terminates the action but does not prohibit its refiling.
 
Back