Containment Random Chris Updates

Gunslinger said:
Hey @Marvin if Jessica turns out to be a troll, which I think is the most likely scenario, and doesn't show up tomorrow for the MLP movie date, how long do you think she can keep postponing meeting in person? If whoever is behind it is video chatting or talking on the phone with Chris, I think they might be able to push the meeting a little further, but I can't see him waiting much longer for confirmation.
Click to expand...
Chris is easy enough to bully if you know the right buttons to push.

It's less likely (but not impossible) that Chris will grow a pair and confront Jessica and demand an IRL meeting. What's more likely is Chris just quietly accepting her excuses and flitting around elsewhere, trying to find meet other "friends".

It's really more in Jessica's hands than it is in Chris' hands. She can keep Chris on the line for quite a long time if she wants to.
TrippinKahlua said:
I thought the date was for October 6th. Did they really change it?
Click to expand...
As far as I know, it's still set for the 6th.
TrippinKahlua said:
Funny then, because I have been noticing @Marvin has been more accepting Jessica as real the past few days.
Click to expand...
What do you mean by "real"?

She's not actually dating Chris, if that's what you mean.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Gorogoroth, Holdek, Apteryx Owenii and 9 others
Marvin said:
What do you mean by "real"?

She's not actually dating Chris, if that's what you mean.
Click to expand...

That she is an actual human being. Named Jessica, but "Jessica Quinn" is an alias. You're still hung on the idea its really her in the pictures, all you say is "There's no proof" its her and briefly explain her pictures won't appear because NOT ALL pictures will appear due to bots. None of this matters whether or not she is really the person in the pictures anyway, because for all we know, her and Chris could have been skyping each other all this time and phone calling, the same shit you and I could do?
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: Holdek and Porker LeVance
TrippinKahlua said:
That she is an actual human being. Named Jessica, but "Jessica Quinn" is an alias. You're still hung on the idea its really her in the pictures, all you say is "There's no proof" its her and briefly explain her pictures won't appear because NOT ALL pictures will appear due to bots. None of this matters whether or not she is really the person in the pictures anyway, because for all we know, her and Chris could have been skyping each other all this time and phone calling, the same shit you and I could do?
Click to expand...
If they were phone calling, I would guess that the mini blowup would not have happened.

Also, Marvin was saying the opposite re: the pictures, he was saying that the pics not showing up on image search is not evidence that those are her real pics.. because cropping & robot.txt exist to stifle image search.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Karen Riley, Porker LeVance, Mesh Gear Fox and 3 others
TrippinKahlua said:
That she is an actual human being. Named Jessica, but "Jessica Quinn" is an alias. You're still hung on the idea its really her in the pictures, all you say is "There's no proof" its her and briefly explain her pictures won't appear because NOT ALL pictures will appear due to bots. None of this matters whether or not she is really the person in the pictures anyway, because for all we know, her and Chris could have been skyping each other all this time and phone calling, the same shit you and I could do?
Click to expand...
Well, there certainly is a human being operating the account. Possibly a woman. Possibly a woman named Jessica. Clyde's real name could've been Clyde, for example.

She and Chris could've been skyping this whole time. Hell, they could've been banging this whole time. We don't have access to the truth of the situation, but what we do have access to is a lot of circumstantial evidence. We're using the circumstantial evidence to argue about what the most likely situation is.

I think that arguing that it's actually Jessica in the pictures and that she's doing this in good faith is not justified by that circumstantial evidence. The fact that the pictures don't show up on google search isn't strong evidence that the photos are actually her, for the reasons you mention. And the google image search thing is pretty much the only evidence in favor of that theory.

Everything else about Jessica's actions and persona suggest that now (but not necessarily back when she was white knighting), she's fucking with Chris in some way.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Muscle Bra, Gorogoroth, Holdek and 13 others
Marvin said:
Well, there certainly is a human being operating the account. Possibly a woman. Possibly a woman named Jessica. Clyde's real name could've been Clyde, for example.

She and Chris could've been skyping this whole time. Hell, they could've been banging this whole time. We don't have access to the truth of the situation, but what we do have access to is a lot of circumstantial evidence. We're using the circumstantial evidence to argue about what the most likely situation is.

I think that arguing that it's actually Jessica in the pictures and that she's doing this in good faith is not justified by that circumstantial evidence. The fact that the pictures don't show up on google search isn't strong evidence that the photos are actually her, for the reasons you mention. And the google image search thing is pretty much the only evidence in favor of that theory.

Everything else about Jessica's actions and persona suggest that now (but not necessarily back when she was white knighting), she's fucking with Chris in some way.
Click to expand...
I still think it's a dude, and if it really is Jessica in the picture, she's acting with a man.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Chanchu, mickmars, Karen Riley and 2 others
screenshot-twitter.com 2017-10-01 16-53-17.png
 
  • Informative
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
Reactions: He Sets Me On Fire, Gorogoroth, Poliwrath and 4 others
Nien Nunb said:
Somebody needs to remove the emoji function from all of Chris's devices.

Preferably with a hammer.
Click to expand...
Well, I would say you could remove his fingers, but he would probably find a way to covertly text using an app that read and translated each of his stress sighs, lip licks, or moob claps.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Bardle-B Jones, Kosher Dill, Karen Riley and 3 others
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Karen Riley and Porker LeVance
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back