Containment Random Thoughts & Questions

In the snowballs chance in hell chris actually got a girlfriend, knowing his obsession with china and how gullible he is, could she make him her slave? I mean what wouldnt he do to keep a steady influx of china coming in? Could she say honey go walk in traffic or im leaving. Would he do it?

Edit: a real live girlfriend not a troll.
 
In the snowballs chance in hell chris actually got a girlfriend, knowing his obsession with china and how gullible he is, could she make him her slave? I mean what wouldnt he do to keep a steady influx of china coming in? Could she say honey go walk in traffic or im leaving. Would he do it?

Edit: a real live girlfriend not a troll.
A sufficiently callous woman could easily control Chris. Barb does it already.

Suicide and murder are out of the question, but robbery might not be.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
In the snowballs chance in hell chris actually got a girlfriend, knowing his obsession with china and how gullible he is, could she make him her slave? I mean what wouldnt he do to keep a steady influx of china coming in? Could she say honey go walk in traffic or im leaving. Would he do it?

Edit: a real live girlfriend not a troll.

well, a real girlfriend probably wouldn't tell him to essentially kill himself, but I get your point.

In my opinion, Chris would do whatever she wanted to appease her. Or at least he would SAY he will do it. Chris doesn't like his comfort zone being threatened, a common trait among autistic people, and he would try to get away with not making any changes for as long as he could.

Let's say she told him to sell all his toys. He would keep her hanging for months saying he needs to "organize things" before he can sell them. Meanwhile, he'll be making zero effort on actually making any steps toward selling said toys. Depending on how tolerant and patient the girl is, this could go on for a while.

Although, a woman that actually cared for (or even loved Chris) for who he is probably wouldn't tell him to sell everything, because she would know those things make him happy. She would likely just try to convince him to decrease his hoard a little bit, to a more "normalized level". Which would be completely understandable...And Chris would STILL fight her every step of the way. At which point, she would probably leave him, because you'd need the patience of a LITERAL angel to put up with all of Chris' shit
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
The "problem" with Patreon is that people can pledge money at any point during the month, but they won't be charged until the end of the month. So it would probably end up becoming a recurring cycle of people pledging a ton of money, then canceling the pledge right before payday.

Now, would this be funny? Absolutely. But since Chris has had a similar experience with eBay, he might wise up to it more quickly.

Something like that already happened with Kickstarter
:julay:s created accounts and placed fake bids and inflated his budget to over $20k before the whole thing was shot down by the kckstarter team.
Oddly enough, Chris was extremely content and did not rage over this.
 
I desperately want Christine do make new music.

"Christian and the Hedgehog Boy" is of course no more and the "COMEBACK!" album was a little disappointing.

I would love if the lovely and talented Christine did her take on 90s-00s pop sluts like Britney and Christina! <3
 
Ok I'll ask here. How do we know for sure CWC paid for his own PS4. I am positive he did because if some chick bought him one he would be already telling people about his love for her and stuff, I just don't get how we know for sure, sorry if it's simple but I don't get it.
 
Ok I'll ask here. How do we know for sure CWC paid for his own PS4. I am positive he did because if some chick bought him one he would be already telling people about his love for her and stuff, I just don't get how we know for sure, sorry if it's simple but I don't get it.

Because the info given by the troll that had access to his email account and leaked the order data was believable (including tracking information for the package) and the name of his "sweetheart" was obviously made up.
 
Because the info given by the troll that had access to his email account and leaked the order data was believable (including tracking information for the package) and the name of his "sweetheart" was obviously made up.
Ok I guess I did get it. I thought I was missing something
 
What does everyone think about Chris receiving welfare. Do you think it's morally right that he receives money to do nothing? Do you think it's practical to give out welfare at all? And do you think people like Chris are the ones who deserve to receive it or are they slipping through the cracks and taking advantage of governmental programs?
 
There are many who receive things that are undeserving. Like GothicKingCobra/ King Cobra Josh Saunders. He works at Wendy's and films YouTube all day ( I know you all know who he is) and smokes weed now and makes horrendous drink combos -- but he gets SSI and only works 2-3 hours every few days. He has a well off family that isn't hurting.

Against that, Chris kinda' needs and has almost earned what he's living on. Now, the post reception use... that's uh..that's what causes my brain to pause.
 
Is welfare necessary? To some degree, yes. Does Chris deserve it? In my opinion, no.

Some people will simply not be able to hold down a job, let's say certain kinds of disabled people. Autism specifically is tricky, because it's a very broad spectrum and people with the same diagnosis may have incredibly different quirks and problems. Some will be able to be a contributing member of society, while others might not have any chance at all to ever get a job because of their condition, no matter how hard they try.

Chris would be capable to hold down an easy job if he was actually motivated to do so and better himself. The problem with him is that he's content with leeching of the government and doesn't give a shit about even trying, and I believe that those who don't even make the effort to the best of their ability are not deserving of welfare money.
 
Back