I honestly want to know why women support trannies who are complete mockeries of them instead of the few who voice their disgust with them. The porn addicted men supporting other porn addicted men even though they'll never fuck eachother makes sense to me. But 40yo Sally saying, "Omg you're so beautiful!" to a middle aged balding man in a Goodwill dress, doesn't.
I'm in a few make fun of troon groups on FB that'll occasionally share posts from troons and the comments on those posts are either troons giving praise or women giving praise. Rarely do I see men say anything supportive (the few that do look like total faggots, so they don't count).
Is it the womanly desire to be liked/approved by all or whoever is in her social group? Not wanting to hurt feelings? Social credit rating superiority/holier than thou? Even the amount of fat/obese moms trooning out their kids for ass pats online is increasing and none of it makes sense.
Women tend to be more obsessed with fitting in socially, yes. Women also tend to be more obsessed with status, which is why they're much more likely to participate in the oppression Olympics, or at least cheerlead for those who participate in it.
Whereas men are more likely to care about practicality and not give a fuck about what others think of them. They engage in more risk-taking behavior, and are more willing to martyr themselves for what they believe/know to be right.
Women are more succeptible to emotional manipulation, as described by
@AMHOLIO . Troons are psychopaths and narcissists, so they are incapable of feeling empathy, but they know how to invoke it from others.
There's also the innate desire to play it safe, to avoid hurting feelings. Their impulse for self-preservation is much stronger than that of men. It's the same reason why women in France or other countries spread their legs for the German occupiers during World War II. They think that the LGBTQP movement will win out, so they are deathly afraid of voicing any opposition to it, out of fear of being "on the wrong side of history."
I mean, seeing that the LGBTQ movement has steamrolled over society ever since the 90s, by using the tactics described in
After the Ball, it makes sense. Seeing any opposition to gay marriage, or anything else of the sort, be smeared as mindless bigotry was pretty demoralizing, so it was a huge temptation for many, myself included, to try to appease gays and troons in the hopes that they'd finally shut the fuck up and leave everyone else alone.
It's only now, that we see that nothing will appease them, that they will go as far as to groom/rape/mutilate kids, that there's any serious pushback against the LGBTQP movement. Only now, that we see the societal consequences of legalizing gay marriage in 2015, can we seriously talk about the uncomfortable truths about homosexuality, and what it does to society if it's normalized, treated as anything else but a deeply embarrassing alternative lifestyle that is better kept in the dark (at best).
