Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

One thing I always thought was interest was that troons are despised by women for perfectly understandable reasons such as them attacking the very concept of real womens' existences. But there is no such hate for pooners from men. Why is this? The lack of obvious male aggression from them? The lack of a masculinist movement?
Easy: they're not physically intimidating. Period.

Women don't like troons in their spaces because private women spaces are set up for a reason. In hobby circles it is much more annoying since for both genders the troonpoon will make everything about themselves, but a hard autism or narcissistic male will be much harder to ice out or isolate than a female pooner who is much more sensitive to these things, even if the men don't realize it.

Beyond that, spaces like bathrooms, locker rooms, shelters, are all places where people are vunerable. Female troons have multiple reddit posts saying how they're still scared to be in men's spaces like that. Meanwhile, hons cry because they are either not allowed or think everyone will think them a rapists. It's the simple factor that men are slmore powerful than women in these situations (we have our own bio advantages but male strenght is sadly not one of them). Think of it this way: the closest equivalent to a brick hon intimidating a man the same way a woman would be if it was an 8ft tall rape clown that was trying to impersonate you and everyone treated it like the special ed kid instead of a predator.
 
Men are way more emotional than women. How many women punch holes in the walls when they're told to wash the dishes, or break their computers when they lose a game of Counter Strike? Four fifths of violent crime (ie, emotionally motivated crime, as opposed to financially or politically motivated crime) is perpetrated by men. If you ever want to see someone go fucking hysterical, wound a man's ego.
My point has thoroughly been missed. There has been no talk about people getting violent. When I talk about social issues, I would hope it is clear that all of that happens in discourse, in language. You've never heard of a single gender studies professor that took over a university by force.

Look at the "I feel" language used when people talk about their identity or their feelings of "oppression", of their passive feelings of helplessness. That their feelings are declarative and beyond reproach.

That is the way women speak. Men do not speak like that. Men rarely talk as if they are completely helpless. Even if they genuinely feel that way, they're not allowed to. And that's the language that pushes the normalization of emotional blackmail or need for "empowerment". The idea that you're always the underdog.

All that? Female.
 
One thing I always thought was interest was that troons are despised by women for perfectly understandable reasons such as them attacking the very concept of real womens' existences. But there is no such hate for pooners from men. Why is this? The lack of obvious male aggression from them? The lack of a masculinist movement?
Because male troons romanticize and want painful and/or traumatic female experience, like period and sexual abuse and act like they can't even open a plastic bottle as if they were a 90yo grandma.
 
Last edited:
Men are way more emotional than women. How many women punch holes in the walls when they're told to wash the dishes, or break their computers when they lose a game of Counter Strike? Four fifths of violent crime (ie, emotionally motivated crime, as opposed to financially or politically motivated crime) is perpetrated by men. If you ever want to see someone go fucking hysterical, wound a man's ego.
Men and women are equally emotional. The difference is that they process their emotions in different ways, each with both healthy and unhealthy modes. This means that to each sex, the other may appear more (or insufficiently) emotional compared to their own baseline state, because the way they externalise and process emotion is fundamentally unfamiliar.

Women typically process their emotional state through communication and consensus-group bonding, while men process their emotional state through physical activity and/or competitive play. These can have healthy and unhealthy modes. For instance, your example of the man punching the wall is an unhealthy processing of emotional state; it is physical and "competitive" (inasmuch as it is a display of physical strength, designed to intimidate), but it is purely destructive. A man with the ability to process his emotions in a healthy way would not break things, but would instead tamp down his emotions until he had the opportunity to process them through something constructive, or at least non-destructive. In the meantime, he'd probably do the dishes.

Likewise, the unhealthy mode of female emotional processing is passive-aggressive abuse, through which the woman might alleviate her emotional state and gain social control by turning her social group against one another, or which she might use to emotionally control a man by denying him the ability to process his emotions in a healthy way, until he's reduced to punching a hole in the wall out of sheer frustration. By contrast, a healthy mode of female emotional processing is to form mutual support structures through which needs and reflective empathy can be safely communicated, and then talk around the externalities of the situation, ideally without judgement.

To bring us back to the troon thoughts, you can see these differences in how each sex tries to emulate the emotional behaviour of the other, by crudely replicating surface-level expression without understanding the underlying differences in emotional processing.

edit: minor clarifications
 
Last edited:
To bring us back to the troon thoughts, you can see these differences in how each sex tries to emulate the emotional behaviour of the other, by replicating surface-level behaviours without understanding the underlying differences in emotional processing.
Also, remember to support the men and women in your life that you like, kiwis. You can do it in the way they respond to best, and keep an eye out and get someone else to help if you can't - that's not a bad thing either. Encouraging your moid and femoid friends to both see cool older people in their lives or positive friends is also helpful if you can't help due to not knowing what to do or autism.
 
Wanted to post this that was on Ovarit. This reddit post is something that always peaked me about trans issues. This TIM's therapist told him that gender is purely internal and that he shouldn't care about how other's see him. He goes on to clearly admit that he needs others to see him as a woman for him to survive long-term. Its been stated many times before but its still something that baffles me. Transgenderism is the only mental health condition where everyone has to play along otherwise the person will threaten to kill themselves if no one does. Of course this guy goes on to argue with his therapist about how she's not a real therapist for not validating him. Again, this goes to show how none of these people want help if they can't take any criticism and just want validation.
5a689911-e02d-5369-8e47-4638e617c682.jpg
 
Wanted to post this that was on Ovarit. This reddit post is something that always peaked me about trans issues. This TIM's therapist told him that gender is purely internal and that he shouldn't care about how other's see him. He goes on to clearly admit that he needs others to see him as a woman for him to survive long-term. Its been stated many times before but its still something that baffles me. Transgenderism is the only mental health condition where everyone has to play along otherwise the person will threaten to kill themselves if no one does. Of course this guy goes on to argue with his therapist about how she's not a real therapist for not validating him. Again, this goes to show how none of these people want help if they can't take any criticism and just want validation.
View attachment 6374488
"If you need training to recognize a man or a woman, thats ideological indoctrination, not acceptance"
Is so funny reading this from a man that needs to tell people to perceive him as a woman to have the illusion of being percieved as a woman
 
It baffles me that these people are so wrapped up in their own existence yet simultaneously can't/don't want to survive their existence. Like intentionally creating doctrines of expected behavior and then hurting themselves when people don't want to go sit for their sermons.

I remember once in my youth going to the bar with my friend, and this asshole walks up and looks down at her and says "You can't drink, you're pregnant". She laughs and says "Uh, not that it's any of your business, but I'm just fat." He said"No way, you're definitely pregnant. You shouldn't be drinking." She says "You want me to piss on a cocktail stick so you can taste test it or are you going to just accept that I'm a fatty and fuck off?"

We both laughed, he fucked off, and we went on with our lives.

People make mistakes and people are fucking stupid. If those FACTS make you want to die, then fuck if ain't gonna be a hard knock life.

Unlike the OG homos, these transfags can't just keep it moving. Talk shit to a gay guy, watch him clap back, laugh, and move on. They dgaf.

Instead of saying anything in the moment, transflags bottle it up and then go bleed their eyeliner to someone who can do nothing about it and then threaten a suicide on the interwebz that won't be lamented once someone tries to tell them the truth.
 
One thing I always thought was interest was that troons are despised by women for perfectly understandable reasons such as them attacking the very concept of real womens' existences. But there is no such hate for pooners from men. Why is this? The lack of obvious male aggression from them? The lack of a masculinist movement?
I sometimes feel bad for pooners, while I typically only feel repulsed by troons.

I think it's inherent in men - or maybe masculinity - to be somewhat protective over women/girls. I've looked into some pooner's back-stories and found horrible tales of abuse that has clearly led to them transitioning to escape being seen as female and therefore a target of abuse. Obviously I'm not saying that they're all like that, but a bunch of the ones I've looked into have been.

Also, pooners are no threat to me physically, and they're unlikely to be creepy sex pests - unlike troons.

Ultimately if I met a pooner at a party or something and I clocked them - which I almost certainly would - I'd probably just feel a bit sad for them.

Big hulking blokes in dresses are another matter of course.
 
I’m just amazed that law and science has fallen to these obvious shysters. It’s a movement of pervert men who enjoy and get off on broaching boundaries. They’ll deny it and claim ‘euphoria boner’ all they like, but it’s true. So many of our societies are based on being polite and generally nice to people, and these perverts have taken every advantage of that. Weaponised it, even. No wonder places like Canada are troon lagoon.

We always knew what these pervy men were like, with their “hur dur I’m a lesbian in a man’s body” shit. Now they’re doing it for real and we’re being told to be nice instead of telling the masturbating bloke in a stripper outfit to fuck off into the men’s toilets.

It’s hard to expect women to confront them, because they run the risk of injury or worse, so men are going to need to step up and get a grip on these perverts too I’m afraid. The perves couldn’t give a damn what a woman thinks, but a bloke will have him running away with his tail between his legs. And less women need to vocally support this shit too. Being “not like the other girls” just makes you a target for these perverts, not a saint.

But yeah. Rant is mainly about how our societies are too polite with these obvious grifters and perverts. Just tell them to fuck off. They survived perfectly well without wanking all over people in public until ten years ago. They have the same rights as everyone else. They’re using the language of social justice to bully everyone. Governments, science and police etc need to just stop letting them.
 
Deermeat said:
Oh my god don't get me started on this. I already despise that attitude women have. I have a gay coworker whos pretty feminine and the women baby him like crazy. The way these women see gay men is not as an equal and only gay men who lack self esteem would ever wanna be apart of that because it's dehumanizing. At least Id hope so, Id hope most picked up on it.

Women don't force gay men into friendships and the majority of straight women aren't remotely interested in gay men either. Life isn't a fucking Will & Grace episode.

I appreciate gay men are narcissists by nature, but plenty of women aren't exactly thrilled by the disgusting filth gay men spout about the female anatomy or with being called "fish" and "hags." It never ceases to amaze me how gay men, who dress up as misogynistic caricatures of womanhood and trap women into sham, often abusive, loveless marriages before dumping their wives they routinely cheated on, can have the fucking audacity to complain about women befriending them when they were using female spaces as a "safe space" for time immemorial.

The gay male is at best a duplicitous, hypocritical user and at worst a paedophile. Clowns that cape for these fucking degenerates disgust me.
 
Last edited:
I saw something recently that reminded of an old piece of wisdom "if its too good to be true, it probably is".

You are trying to tell me that there's a pill, a hormonal pill, that can MAGICALLY turn you into the opposite sex? Or better yet, not even a pill! If you say you are the opposite sex, then magically you must be! But considering most troons support and go on HRT, they view it as magically transforming them into the other sex. And with femboys, they view it as an anti sging supplement that'll magically keep them a twink forever.

Wow. All your problems solved. Truly a magical, wonderful drug. Why didn't we think about this sooner?

Of course if you mention the dangers of HRT such as what happened with ERT in regards to menopausal women, a discontinued form of therapy due to the severe health issues it caused, or in regards to steriod use and the severe danger T causes to women... You get either labelled a transphobe or get told that somehow "its different". Its just magically different, you guys.
Or really point out how dangerous any artificial hormone is... Yeah for some reason people of all variety, not just troons, defend artificial hormone injection. What do you think happens when its injected? Why do you think one of the most common issues is related to your immune system? No, no guys. Wegovy is a wonder drug! Its magical! Totally ignore the thousands of people who already suffered consequences and the fact we have no idea the long term consequences of the drugs we are pushing! Why put in any effort in overcoming hard physical amd psychological challenges when you can just inject yourself with hormones?

Generally speaking, if one field proves something is bad.... Its bad. It doesmt magically become safe just because its related to a different field. Troons love that mentality. "Umm that science talks about treatment for body dsyphoria, this is GENDER dsyphoria. Its (d)ifferent".
Its why I memtioned the effects ERT had for menopausal women. If ERT didnt work to treat women who are biologically meamt to maintain estrogen, what makes you think ERT works on men whos not supposed to maintain the same level of high estogen as a female? This baffles me because even normies act like HRT is a magical cure. Nigga this shit is gonna kill you lol
 
Ive been thinking a little bit. Usually when we talk about troons that are deep in the cult we tend to be very pesimistic (with really good reason) seems that there is no way to them to get back to reality, and yet, detransitioners are a thing, i know it is a small minority within a small minority, but maybe detransitioners should be studied further.
From what i see from this kind of thread or threads like losing people to transgenderism, many express that in retrospective there were signals of those people wanting to troon out before they even troon out, some act out when they recognize those signals and at least theres something to try to stop or at least delay people from trooning out, like getting out of the internet, stop watching porn and so on.
But what if someone is so deep into transgenderism? is it a lost case? in most cases, yeah, but yet, detransitioners exist.
Theres signals of people pre-troon out, but what would be the signals of someone who wants to stop being trans? maybe knowing about these would be good to help people, it might sound optimistic and spergy but maybe there is a solution to this ideology even for hardcore troons, we got so good at recognizing patterns for someone who might troon out, maybe we should try and do the same with those that detransition
 
Ive been thinking a little bit. Usually when we talk about troons that are deep in the cult we tend to be very pesimistic (with really good reason) seems that there is no way to them to get back to reality, and yet, detransitioners are a thing, i know it is a small minority within a small minority, but maybe detransitioners should be studied further.
From what i see from this kind of thread or threads like losing people to transgenderism, many express that in retrospective there were signals of those people wanting to troon out before they even troon out, some act out when they recognize those signals and at least theres something to try to stop or at least delay people from trooning out, like getting out of the internet, stop watching porn and so on.
But what if someone is so deep into transgenderism? is it a lost case? in most cases, yeah, but yet, detransitioners exist.
Theres signals of people pre-troon out, but what would be the signals of someone who wants to stop being trans? maybe knowing about these would be good to help people, it might sound optimistic and spergy but maybe there is a solution to this ideology even for hardcore troons, we got so good at recognizing patterns for someone who might troon out, maybe we should try and do the same with those that detransition
I adopt the mentality of addiction.
Some addicts are addicts to escape pain from trauma. Some addicts are addicts to escape feelings of inadequacy caused by depression. Those addicts are the most likely to get better.
But there are plenty of addicts who are addicts, but they are also cluster Bs and addicts who either start off psychotic or end up that way. They will never get better unless they are forced into it, and even then they'll always suffer in some way. They usually end up killing themself (not always by direct suicide, sometimes by accident), killing someone else, or succumbing to the consequences of addiction. Maybe in extremely rare cases, they can be helped. But there's a reason insane asylums existed. There;s a reason why theres a high amount of people in prison.

Look how many people die from addiction, Obesity, drugs, alcoholics, etc. Look how many end up in jail, something not often talked about is how many porn addicts commit horrible crimes.
Troonery is a community built upon enabling addiction, based on an ideology centered around narcissism and psychosis. Every single troon has one or two addictions, maybe more. And because its a cult, they are discouraged from seeking any outside help that doesn't affirm their delusions. They are told that those people want them dead.
Its a mix between supporting both psychosis and cluster B behavoir, the two things that cause someone to be unlikely to get any actual help.
And yet like you said, detransitoners exist. But also, just like addiction itself, not every troon is inherently psychotic or a cluster B. And amoung detransitioners, like anyone trying to recover from addiction, it's usually people who transitoned in order to escae pain and trauma, or overall inadequacy. It's people who truly did not know what they were getting into,. Much like cult victims.

A lot of troons, the majority of them, are too narcisstic or too delusional to accept detransitonining because overall they are too narcisstic or delusional to accept fault in any other facet in their life.
 
why can't we view "intersex" as mutations? There are two sexes, XY and XX. Anything else is abnormal. It doesn't mean it's bad or wrong to be intersex, or that they shouldn't have rights, it's just a biological error if you will, as they tend to be sterile.
So, a person with XX chromosome is female, no matter the external sex organs or hormones.
This still preserves the notion that sex is binary.
 
I actually made an observation a little while ago that I'll put in here since I realized it kind of fit in here too.
I wonder, do they get mad about men that got higher pitched voices? Or do they try grooming em? I've weirdly never seen troons on the naturally high pitched male side now that I think about it, it's kind of weird.
Forgive the mildly repetitive wording, I'm always barely awake or distracted by other shit when I get these kinds of realizations.

To go a bit further, I've very rarely ever seen short troons. (not counting the pooner variety that's cheating)

Are short/natural high voice guys just immune to the trans brain plague to some degree? Or is it the vocal training shit that fucks them up and makes them all sound like that? Makes me wonder, man.


why can't we view "intersex" as mutations? There are two sexes, XY and XX. Anything else is abnormal. It doesn't mean it's bad or wrong to be intersex, or that they shouldn't have rights, it's just a biological error if you will, as they tend to be sterile.
So, a person with XX chromosome is female, no matter the external sex organs or hormones.
This still preserves the notion that sex is binary.
Aren't extra chromosomes the shit that causes downs syndrome sometimes or am I misremembering this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aunt Carol
why can't we view "intersex" as mutations? There are two sexes, XY and XX. Anything else is abnormal. It doesn't mean it's bad or wrong to be intersex, or that they shouldn't have rights, it's just a biological error if you will, as they tend to be sterile.
So, a person with XX chromosome is female, no matter the external sex organs or hormones.
This still preserves the notion that sex is binary.
They think that by adding some sort of ambiguity as to where the distinction between male and female is, they are proving that the concepts of male and female themselves don't actually exist. The logic is something like "actually some people have chromosomal disorders or congenital defects that cause abnormal development of their genitals or gonads which means they don't fit your definition of what male and female are, this is why I, a fully intact man who has none of these disorders is actually female."

Ironically, they never apply the same logic to other identities. Race actually is on a spectrum, there is no 100% objectively agreed upon way to draw the line on when someone stops being or starts being a certain race. Is Elizabeth Warren Native American because she has homeopathic levels of Native DNA? Or is she a white lady who pretended to be native? Or is she some third thing that doesn't fall into binary classifications? These questions don't have clear answers, yet we can still recognize that "white" and "native american" haven't stopped existing as distinct concepts.
 
Last edited:
Back