I could also imagine that some “chasers” are gay men from cultures which have no tolerance for homosexuality, so when they see a troon, they think bingo!
For some reason, that's what I always assumed.
What really rubs me the wrong way is that all these men going to Thailand behinds their wives/gfs back are from our culture.
But they will then proceed to behave like they would towards a western woman, assuming that the troon is just a free whore.
How common it really is, who knows.
I don't think they are different. The question is, if gay rights, woke-shit and all that are so effective, why? Seems almost as if all this activsim isn't actually helping with what it's ought to but only does damage, like erasing women.
And again, I don't think it's
But I would imagine in the non western men cases, Troons keep quiet about their ethnic/cultural origins as they fear accusations of racism.
And again, I think you are way to soft on "our" men here. The western men, who behave like that and believe in trannyism, how different are they?
I'm beginning to suspect we should stop call them "fetishists" because that's kinda like the gays defending everything with their born this way shtick.
It's probably all the same, they just lead us on with different and more complex copes.
We seem to forget which culture "developed" all these medical techniques and that when that happened, we had the same attitudes towards gays as "them"...
And we're even worse, because we also do it to little girls... tho, with the opposite outcome: they become less attractive to men - at least I'd think so...
It's fiction that they believe successfully depicts them as not only being desirable but victims at the same time.
But if that wasn't true, men wouldn't get off on castrating these teens and wouldn't have invented the whole thing.
What weirds me out even more, in that regard, is the FTM thing.
But I'm suspecting that only came about to hold up the whole esoteric concept about gender, if you can have a medical condishun that's all about being born in the wrong body, it would've been weird to not accomodate women who claim the same thing - yeah, I think that's probably it.
It's also very interesting that most, like me, were really peaked on this, when they began going -disproportionately- after girls in the past ten years before that, it really didn't ping on my radar. Cue, Abigail Shrier.
It's almost as if these doctors, policymakers and psychiatrists try to hold up the gender framework just for plausible denial of their deranged coomerism, which is the actual force behind it all, but then, inadvertently, it went to for in the eyes of the public, because people do tend to care more about girls than boys.
God, I have to stop cramming stuff in via edit... so many thoughts on this.