Off-Topic Random Trans Thoughts, Musings, and Questions - For all your armchair psych and general sperging

The stumbling block with this theory is that transbian couples are notoriously incapable of being intimate with one another in a way that isn't abstracted under a dozen layers of kink. IMO, when they shack up together, it's partly out of desperation, partly out of a desire to be with someone else who "gets it" and won't pop the fetish bubble (because the actual physical attributes of their partner are almost a non-factor in their version of sexuality).

If they could find an actual woman who enabled them in the same way, going T4T wouldn't even be a consideration -- but none exist.
 
Every single one of them voted no.
Just remember for all you normies who think this is okay, the people trying to take away womens' actual rights can't define what being a woman fucking means. They can't define "woman". Let alone the fact there's no science proving that women are weaker than men, quite the contrary.
And if you normies are really not swayed, the trans men who fight against other men has never ever won. Not even once. Every single trans man lost when fighting against a man.
Screenshot 2025-03-03 223759.png
I don't know guys, seeing this. *Fedpost fedpost fedpost* TTD.
 
I am just going to preface this by saying, this is just a thought. I am not dying on this hill or anything. So don't come for me hard please.

I saw it mentioned in another thread that trannies may be fucking up statistics by making crime rates for women go up, because they are being reported wrong due to trans women committing crimes.

Would it be relevant to force a third gender identity for trans people for accurate record keeping? (Not one for NB people, they can fuck off - only people who identify as a gender opposite of their birth sex). The whole debate of "there are only two genders" seems to force people in M or F, and I know that giving into their "more than two genders" bullshit would be bad, but instead of forcing TiMs into F or M, we could have marked them as "TF" or something. It would let everyone know what they are. I get it feels like conceding the gender debate, but by doing this we could accurately gather information about their crime rates and other statistics. It would give them their own category, and prevent them from mucking up statistics.

I know feeding into the delusion is a slippery slope with trans people, but their delusion is being full on female, "trans women are women", etc. Forcing them to mark themselves as a trans-female on official documents would out them and allow statistics to be reported accurately.

I know it wouldn't go anywhere with our current discourse, and I understand there are still problems with this.
I think the statistics question to ask is, "Why is there a significant increase in woman [I'm using this word for a reason] perpetrators in certain crimes?" I am not a statistician, but I think it'd be rather easy to discern whether a criminal that identifies as a woman is born male or female. After describing one's methodology, I don't think it'd be hard to get people to see the conclusion except for the die-hard believers.
 
because the actual physical attributes of their partner are almost a non-factor in their version of sexuality
Kinda like gold diggers...
So basically, what you say is that they don't really have an "orientation" but are opportunistic towards anyone who'd be willing to fuck them? Still kinda sound like desperate gay guys...
For the more prudish kiwis it's TMI to tell these types of anecdotes, but I dated a chick in high school, who talked my ear off about how she loves it when a guy works himself up "for" her. She always wanted to do more and more porny stuff... she was really into that whole objectification thing as I'd now call it... And to double down on that notion, she, uh, dated much older and imho, less attractive men after she was done with me. I always suspected I wasn't meassuring up to her one sided, all consuming need for validation through sex...
Don't now where she is or what she does now, but I don't have a good feeling about her to say the least - Was very pretty and fun to hang with otherwise, somewhat sad aftertaste...

Basically, I think we have to stick with what we can see, not with what we think goes on in their head:

Many of them are active homosexuals, but also bed women
Tho, many of them leave and resent their former spouses.
They seem to be into humiliation, infantilization and the works.

But don't you dare call them homos, because they are actually WOMEN: Either straight or lesbian, but never gay.
As they will tell you, because they play dress up and got boobs.
Don't know, but I'm still convinced I am onto something obvious there... something homophobia...
really I hate that misnomer... tho, in line with my theory, it might be more accurate than I thought...

I guess I'll just stick to calling the ugly sex pest freaks agp, since that seems to make them seethe and the uncanny looking, peaceful creepers shemale, to make those seethe too.
 
Last edited:
Every single one of them voted no.
Just remember for all you normies who think this is okay, the people trying to take away womens' actual rights can't define what being a woman fucking means. They can't define "woman". Let alone the fact there's no science proving that women are weaker than men, quite the contrary.
And if you normies are really not swayed, the trans men who fight against other men has never ever won. Not even once. Every single trans man lost when fighting against a man.
View attachment 7052577
I don't know guys, seeing this. *Fedpost fedpost fedpost* TTD.
Crosspost this to Transgender Legislation and Litigation.

What I'll say here is that not a single trans person shut this down. Every male and female Democrat handmaiden shut it down.

This is important. No trans person has power until handmaidens hand power over, supplicate, bend the knee, worship the trans class, in particular trans-identified males, as the glory of glories.

My understanding such as it is, is that this did not pass because Democrats can threaten to filibuster and it requires 60 votes to end a filibuster.

I can only hope this craven, venal, immoral, brainless, disgusting enablement of trans madness by Democrats means the midterms result in 60 Republican senators. I know that's actually impossible. But I also hope that every single one of their female children (or lets be honest, grandchildren) are forced to play against men in sports, and that those girls turn to these legislators and say "you betrayed me".
 
The key thing to understand is that the main source of sexual arousal is themselves. Maybe some of them are bisexual, but by and large they are attracted to the idea of themselves as a woman, so they seek out men to fuck them because in their mind being a woman = getting fucked by a man.
Isn't all this just the most ass-backwards way of communicating to people: "I'm a bottom!", without once saying so?
 
They can't just say they're bottoms, that's gay and they're not gay men or something idek. The logic just loops back on itself to the point that the whole trans movement- especially the mtf part- seems like it's desperately trying to identify away the gay.

This headline is something.
View attachment 7055519
:story:
Were they actually snickering at him or were they talking amongst themselves like women do and- heaven forbid- laughing about something else? The two in the middle seem focused on the person next to them as opposed to the troon.
 
I saw it mentioned in another thread that trannies may be fucking up statistics by making crime rates for women go up, because they are being reported wrong due to trans women committing crimes.

Would it be relevant to force a third gender identity for trans people for accurate record keeping?
No. Transwomen's offense patterns line up with male offense patterns. Which should not be in any way surprising since they are male. Their fee-fees do not alter this. There is no forcing, merely the description of banal, material reality. You are male or you are female. Sex is binary because gametes are binary, and in mammals is fixed.

If they actually are more vulnerable in prisons, maybe they should make a unit or ward in the men's prison to house them. It's worth noting that there are other populations of men in prison that are considered vulnerable- young men, autistic men, small/effeminate men, gay men, men from a rival gang, rapists, pedophiles, animal abusers/fuckers and so on. Weird how we suddenly care about how vulnerable rapists are in men's prison's once that say they are true and honestly ladies.
 
I have an acquaintance who went on a rant about Emilia Perez, saying that it is transphobic because it isn't about a real trans woman, but rather that it is about a criminal who pretends to be trans and troons out to escape justice. Meanwhile it stars a real troon, who received a nomination under the "best actress" category. I just think it is amusing tranny supporters are gonna be mad about this movie, while it uplifts and supports an actual troon.

I don't know where else to post this, and I do not really have a point. I just like to vent somewhere whenever I encounter pro-trans bullshit in person. Anyways, have a laugh at how unpassable this huge ass man is
I don't think polka dots are ever in at a black-tie event. Fashion faux pas, coming from the man in a dress, of course.

Screenshot 2025-03-05 121419.png

Screenshot 2025-03-05 121436.png

Screenshot 2025-03-05 121457.png


Note the pin placement. Instead of on the breast area, where women typically pin brooches, it is where one would have a cuff link. Very feminine.

Screenshot 2025-03-05 122118.png
 
So I just got into an argument with an online friend who I thought was against transgenderism and thought the whole thing was insane but it turns out that he actually believe in the whole concept of gender identity and argues that "Science proves that gender is something that's ingrained in the brain and neurology backs up transgender people's brains matching their gender identities" . This is going to be a mouth full but bear with me. I literally tried arguing with him and he really thinks that

"The "social" roles for a man would be more about leadership, physical strength, protection, and providing for your family. For a woman it would be domestic responsibilities, caregiving, nurturing, etc."
"But social roles change, because nowadays, women are in the workforce, are in leadership positions, serve in combat, etc., while men are also increasing their involvement in childcare and expressing themselves emotionally"

He also argued that gender identity is not solely defined by societal roles or stereotypes When I brought up certain things associated with men, such as, did you like playing with car toys growing up? Does your sex drive have a significant visual component? Are you more solutions-oriented than relationally-oriented? You're probably describing a man. Women can and have been one, two, or all three of these things, but it's statistically unlikely. Brain scans are similar. I believe one of the major differences between the sexes is that women tend to have stronger connections between their hemispheres, whereas men have stronger intra-hemisphere connections. But if you're a woman and your brain hits all the masculine hotspots, and you like machines, the likelihood is certainly higher that you're a butch lesbian. There's zero chance you're "actually" a man.

This was his response. He accused me of conflating gender identity with interests and personality traits. He states below

"You're assuming that trans people are simply misinterpreting their preferences rather than experiencing a fundamental disconnect between their gender identity and assigned sex. The available research on trans brain structures contradicts the idea, as it shows gender identity has deeper roots than just hobbies or behavior...sir."

Can someone explain to me the difference between a guy who puts on makeup and wears dresses because he has a more feminine personality trait is different than a guy claiming that he's a woman because his gender identity tells him that woman = makeup and wearing dresses? How exactly is gender not personality, preferences, and interests when at the same time trans people literally argue that following said traits makes them women?
 
Can someone explain to me the difference between a guy who puts on makeup and wears dresses because he has a more feminine personality trait is different than a guy claiming that he's a woman because his gender identity tells him that woman = makeup and wearing dresses? How exactly is gender not personality, preferences, and interests when at the same time trans people literally argue that following said traits makes them women?
Brain structures are irrelevant. Personalities and interests are irrelevant. Blowing the brains out of a trans woman would not make him a man, because he was already a man and no brain activity could make it otherwise.

If you have a phenotype that is patterned after producing large, sessile gametes, you are female. If you have a phenotype patterned after producing small, motile gametes, you are male. Humans also cannot change sex.

It's that simple.
 
Brain structures are irrelevant. Personalities and interests are irrelevant. Blowing the brains out of a trans woman would not make him a man, because he was already a man and no brain activity could make it otherwise.

If you have a phenotype that is patterned after producing large, sessile gametes, you are female. If you have a phenotype patterned after producing small, motile gametes, you are male. Humans also cannot change sex.

It's that simple.
EDIT: Here's the thing though, he doesn't believe trans women are biological females. He thinks "gender identity" is something thats been proven. I was very shocked at his support because he's someone who claimed that transgenderism should be eradicated from public life. So I thought he would see the ridiculoness of it all but no. I kept trying to tell him that the whole sex and gender being different was something a lot of trans people online don't believe in anymore and that they really think they're biological women/female . It's even something that can get you banned from reddit but he just laughed it off and accused me of using outliers to generalize an entire community. Like bro these aren't outliers, this is what the community actually believes in otherwise you would see more trans people call out those who harass lesbians for not being attracted to trans women and "girl cock".
 
Last edited:
This headline is something.
View attachment 7055519
They have such a desire to legitimize their oppression points by comparing themselves to blacks. Notice that, despite being true and honest women, they never want to appropriate what went on during the suffrage movements.

This could be because we don't have much video evidence from that time period, though, which means a lot of people overlook the violent responses many had to the protestors, whether they were being suffragette terrorists or suffragist protesters. Then again, they spend so much time delegitimizing women's movements, they'd never compare themselves to them:

https://www.history.com/news/night-terror-brutality-suffragists-19th-amendment
Dorothy Day was described by her fellow suffragists as a “frail girl.” Yet on the night of November 14, 1917, prison guards at the Occoquan Workhouse, did not hold back after she and 32 other women had been arrested several days earlier for picketing outside the White House.

“The two men handling her were twisting her arms above her head. Then suddenly they lifted her up and banged her down over the arm of an iron bench—twice,” recalled 73-year-old Mary Nolan, the oldest of the prisoners, in an account published by Doris Stevens.

Faced with brutal treatment by guards and horrendous living conditions at Occoquan, including worm-ridden food and filthy water and bedding, Paul and others began demanding to be treated as political prisoners. After going on a hunger strike, Paul was repeatedly force-fed and transferred in early November to the District Jail’s psychiatric ward.

The 33 women brought to Occoquan on the night of November 14 also demanded to be treated as political prisoners. Instead, prison superintendent William H. Whittaker called on his guards to teach the women a lesson. Bursting into the room where the women were waiting to be booked, the guards dragged them down the hall and threw them into dark, filthy cells.

Burns had her hands shackled to the top of a cell, forcing her to stand all night; the guards also threatened her with a straitjacket and a buckle gag. Day (the future founder of the Catholic Worker Movement) was slammed down on the arm of an iron bench twice. Dora Lewis lost consciousness after her head was smashed into an iron bed; Alice Cosu, seeing Lewis’ assault, suffered a heart attack, and didn’t get medical attention until the following morning.

Nolan’s account of the Night of Terror, as well as pages from a diary Burns kept while at Occoquan, was later published by Doris Stevens in Jailed for Freedom, her book about the NWP.
 
I guess know we know who Hunter Schafer is skinwalking...

View attachment 7062405
The fuck. Yeah, I had this thread on notifications... Well, didn't work out so well, did it? You can tell that they were told how much alike they looked as kids, but not anymore, the man is poking through after all. Castrating himself didn't pan out for him, did it? Creepy a.f.

Also: Modeling standards my ass, his sister would just beat him out in an actual casting and I never heard of or seen her plastered all over the media.
Shows you how upside down things are.
 
I guess know we know who Hunter Schafer is skinwalking...

View attachment 7062405
Why the fuck would he ever agree to be photographed next to her? This highlights their obvious physical differences in the starkest relief possible.

Edit: i mean jesus just look at his fucking head size lol
 
I kept trying to tell him that the whole sex and gender being different was something a lot of trans people online don't believe in anymore and that they really think they're biological women/female . It's even something that can get you banned from reddit but he just laughed it off and accused me of using outliers to generalize an entire community.
I've said before that I don't think there's one guiding cabal, one sinister planner behind transgenderism, just a whole lot of different interests that are well-served by a facet of it, just like there are so many ways for a person to fall into trans and the spikes are backwards trying to get out.

But the automatic motte-and-bailey of not having a Trans Pope or a CEO of Trans is an excellent automated self-defense feature. "Only extremists think that" because there's nowhere you can go and load a page of what the trans consensus is this week, let alone archives of previous decrees.

Today is 6th MARCH 2025 and sex and gender are: SYNONYMS

and then you could click "history" and see when it flipped over, or check when "trans*" became a slur or hyphens became mandatory.
 
"Science proves that gender is something that's ingrained in the brain and neurology backs up transgender people's brains matching their gender identities"
If transgenderism is brain-based, then why don't they do a brain scan, or any kind of neurological testing on people seeking transition so they can prevent the patient from facing future struggles with detransition, including damage to the endocrine system and literal amputation/mutilation? Why do they dole out hormones and surgeries after hearing them say "I think, therefore I am" instead of doing a medical test? I don't know which brain studies he was looking at (you should probably get him to show which ones, they're all shit and you can probably find a debunking of one if you search for the study, author, and a debunk/breakdown), or if he looked at them at all instead of just taking other peoples words for it, but he probably believes there's a benefit to "real" trans people when they get gender-affirming care. Recent studies have shown that trans people are MORE suicidal after medically transitioning, and even old anecdotes show that trans people killing themselves after transitioning is an age-old tradition. So transitioning doesn't even help them.
"You're assuming that trans people are simply misinterpreting their preferences rather than experiencing a fundamental disconnect between their gender identity and assigned sex.
They are, literally, misinterpreting their preferences. Trans people are 3-6 times more likely to be autistic, which on it's own is enough to justify social confusion, and especially social identity confusion like "I want long hair and painted nails, am I a girl?". There's also the contagious ideas about how "if you've thought about being trans, you're probably trans" and "you don't need a reason to transition" and that "gender-affirming care should be freely available and not gatekept because gender self-determination is a human right and key part of autonomy" (paraphrasing because I can't be assed to read that shit again). The difference between a man who wears makeup and a trans-identified man who wears makeup is just a lot of useless inward self-centered rumination and the declaration of "I am a woman". And if he says "maybe I'm a woman"? Then he's nonbinary.
I kept trying to tell him that the whole sex and gender being different was something a lot of trans people online don't believe in anymore and that they really think they're biological women/female . It's even something that can get you banned from reddit but he just laughed it off and accused me of using outliers to generalize an entire community.
Even if the people insisting that troons were biologically female were outliers, at least a handful of those outliers are very prominent, which drastically changes things. The majority of people will believe something if it's from someone they trust, if it sounds smart enough, or if it aligns with their own personal beliefs and/or the beliefs of their herd. See how one sports-winning tranny, Veronica Ivy, goes on a tv show and shits out "I am a biological female because I'm biological and I identify as female". Then someone like Erin Reed, who is both a prominent transgender activist journalist and married to an elected transgender US state representative, says it too (with slightly smarter, but still incorrect reasoning):
Erin Reed Female 1.png

Erin Reed Female 2.png

while various activist groups (and doctors!) claim that there's not any difference between male and female. Eventually it all trickles down until the rest of the group is fully saturated with this rhetorical fat. This is from the recent controversy about the spa that had a single monthly "cultural and religious" female-only night, for women who couldn't be naked in front of males:
Archimedes Banya CBS Article - Trans women are biological women.jpg


This might end up getting tangly, but ask him to define exactly what a "gender identity" is, what it actually is if it's both separate from sex and also not sexist stereotypes, while also somehow being tangentially connected to ever-changing still sexist modern sex stereotypes, and how it meshes with other things trans people crow about like "gender isn't real, so you can do what you want" and "gender-nonconforming trans people" like feminine trans boys or butch trans women. Maybe make him go through the gender dysphoria bible or other "am I trans?" guides made by trans people, and then ask him if he would qualify as a woman/nonbinary at the end. It's a bit off-topic to your post, but Inauthentic Selves is also a read I would recommend to anybody, the "What is transgenderism?" section has a nice breakdown on what medical and activist groups consider valid transition criteria (specifically for children).
 
Back