Random Tumblr posts

Clearly, if a woman told a man to smile because he's handsome, Tumblr would prefer it be a transman. After all, transmen need support (sometimes) and cismales need for nothing in their entire lives. Haven't you been reading the material, Johnny?

I think I got the wrong literature, I was told transmen lives don't matter because they're gender traitors.
 
To be fair, a lot of 10-15 year olds probably don't know gang signs.
Unless they've been taught at an early age about that stuff in places like Compton. You don't know...

Polysexual Asexual.... those things don't work together. That's like being a vegan who eats steak.
Even if it's faux meat meant to look like real steak?
 
problematicreality.png

phobia.png
 
Funny enough, I had a discussion regarding this earlier today about how Modern Feminists and SJWs seem a little confused as to what they actually want in terms of women's rights of choice; as women choosing to become wives, mothers, and home makers is seen as some god awful sin or some bullshit. Fuck their happiness in a simpler but self-rewarding life while their husband is working. Why aren't you a CEO of 15 companies Mrs. Mommy? How dare you!

They just continue to show that they don't want freedom of choice for anybody. If you don't fit what they want, you're a traitor.
They think that if a woman chooses to be a stay at home mom she's got internalized muh soggy knees, because apparently women can't just know what they want to do and make a choice without the patriarchy implanting the idea in their head.
 
This shit already sort of happened with Flower. They think she's non-binary because her new design is very androgynous despite the fact that she's stated to be female.

Wait, do you mean this Flower? They made him a girl?

82cc3c8c52b2dc71640370b768c48dce.png


What the hell happened to just complimenting someone to be nice? Why does everything got to have some dark and/or horrifying patriarchal conspiracy behind it?

If a woman told a dude he should smile because he's handsome, would they be complaining this much? Or even at all?

I'm gonna be the voice of dissent here and say that, while the intentions are sweet, telling a stranger to smile just makes things awkward when a "you look nice today" would suffice and probably get a genuine smile. Somebody could have a reason for not smiling and some rando telling them they should smile could end up being insulting, even if there's no ill intent. You don't want to be the jerk telling someone to smile 'cause they look pretty and that lady is on the way to her grandma's funeral.
 
They think that if a woman chooses to be a stay at home mom she's got internalized muh soggy knees, because apparently women can't just know what they want to do and make a choice without the patriarchy implanting the idea in their head.

I'll bet most of these bitches would choose to be a trophy wife if they could.
 
This shit already sort of happened with Flower. They think she's non-binary because her new design is very androgynous despite the fact that she's stated to be female.
It wasn't even that. I remember when she was first announced (and still wore long hair and a dress), someone mistranslated the sentence "female with androgynous voice" as "androgyne with female voice" and ended up being corrected on it within a few hours. Cue drama and Ryulong-tier edit warring, just because some people wanted it to be canon really badly.
 
How the fuck does vocaloid even have a canon? It's just flashy designs to give a look to a voice in a song making program
There's sort of canon, but it's just fluff like "16-year-old robot school girl". Yet there are real, legitimate debates about the importance of proper trans and POC representation on the box art for a piece of software, and people giving gender, sexuality, and mental illness headcanons to characters that barely even exist.
 
There's sort of canon, but it's just fluff like "16-year-old robot school girl". Yet there are real, legitimate debates about the importance of proper trans and POC representation on the box art for a piece of software, and people giving gender, sexuality, and mental illness headcanons to characters that barely even exist.
But the story is different for each song. In some songs, the character is a school girl, in another a famous diva, in another a thief in another an angel, in another a girl lost in the woods, ect. Nothing is stable enough to call it 'canon'.
 
But the story is different for each song. In some songs, the character is a school girl, in another a famous diva, in another a thief in another an angel, in another a girl lost in the woods, ect. Nothing is stable enough to call it 'canon'.
You're overthinking it a little bit. They're "idols" pretty much, they act and preform in songs. Beyond being pop stars, they have miscellaneous likes and dislikes, basic personalities that fit their voice type. Stuff like that is their 'canon', everything else is fan content for the most part.
 
It wasn't even that. I remember when she was first announced (and still wore long hair and a dress), someone mistranslated the sentence "female with androgynous voice" as "androgyne with female voice" and ended up being corrected on it within a few hours. Cue drama and Ryulong-tier edit warring, just because some people wanted it to be canon really badly.
I didn't know what to get more moronic than what I said but by God they managed it. I need booze.
 
Back