Random Tumblr posts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
As for the second point in that post, it wouldn't be too unreasonable to assume Pulaski hasn't had too much experience with childbirth on Starfleet vessels since for a long time no one brought families aboard and presumably women who did get pregnant just went on shore leave.

Yes, the Galaxy class was the first ship to officially be built with families in mind. While there was at least one allusion to it on TOS and the other series indicated it was a thing that happened every so often, the Galaxy was the first one where it was expected to be the norm. Pulaski, as I recall, also came out of retirement as a special favor to Picard to replace Crusher, so she was almost certainly not used to attending to births for most of her career as a doctor.

Also I think people forget how recent a phenomenon the father being present in the delivery room is. (An especially common problem for tumblrinas, who cannot conceive of a world before they were born.) Up through the sixties at the very least, hospitals outright forbid the fathers to be present, banishing them to a waiting room, it didn't matter if they wanted to be there or not. Considering it was the second season of TNG and thus firmly in the eighties, fathers being present for the birth was still a fairly new deal, and as usual for sci-fi current social norms are reflected in stuff set centuries in the future. Pulaski, as an older, "old-fashioned" doctor would have snorted at the idea of a father being present for the birth because that's what an older, old-fashioned doctor would have done in the eighties, and just like Pulaski they would have allowed it after huffing and puffing a bit.
 


0A3FE1CD-C1E8-4E59-8137-22EFFBFC5228.jpeg
 
Discourse over using real-life languages to fictional alien races:

View attachment 1653469
I hate to say this, but I agree with the wokesters on this one. The idea of "taking inspiration from existing languages is problematic, so why don't filmmakers just take the whole language instead!" is super dumb to me. Not to mention conlangs are cool as fuck and I love seeing in-depth ones in media. They really help the world feel lived in and very different from our own. To use real languages in their stead and claim it's actually a whole different language just feels cheap and lazy.
 
Terfs are stupid for thinking that trans women = men
But this is just borderline rape fanfic under the disguise of "terfs dont deserve love uwu"
Exactly.

This comes from the same community who have a flirtatious banter with someone using Tumblrs chat function and say they have been sexually assaulted when they eventually fall out.
 
Terfs are stupid for thinking that trans women = men
It depends, what kind of people do you consider a "TERF"? Some trans women are obviously just Autogynophiles trying to live out their fetish and then there are others that do it for brownie points online.

Very few of them (usually the ones not online 24/7) are actually legitimately trying to be trans. I don't blame the "TERF"s for thinking that way.
 
Holy shit this woman is hysterical. Yet compulsively readable, I'll give her that. I feel like I have a retarded lesbian Latina doctor screaming directly in my face. I mean she has some fair points but she could express them in a less hysterical way. Imagine writing this much self indulgent linguistic diarrhea. She always uses her subjective emotions as evidence and let's her emotions speak louder than the actual arguments.
I'm gonna say this: She does make some fair points, including that americans are really self cantered. I can't exactly blame americans about this since it's true the world does like what americans sell/create/do. The problem is that not only I think it must be infuriating for not brainwashed american people watch woke/SJWs do this shit it's also infuriating for anyone with half a brain from any other country in the world to watch it as well.

Because they'll act like they give a shit when it's all performative. (Which is infecting other countries as well- other countries that like to jump in the bandwagon of whatever americans are doing.) The problem isn't even americans being self-centered, it's the hypocrisy of the woke crowd in america. Because now the self-centered american woke crowd expects people from other countries act like how they do and will shame them if they don't, all while not giving a shit about that person's Culture/Country.

"But when faced upon a mistake, you can choose to take the role of the educator or the role of the enforcer, and by god do americans choose the latter most of the time."
This is absolutely true, but she is seriously mixing up americans being self-centered and the nasty woke crowd. An american that acts like that is not acting like that because they are self-centered, they're acting like that because they're a nasty human being that want to feel powerful and righteous over others and teach enforce their - or most of the time the hive - views as correct to punish others.

PS About the whole political talk, she is bullshitting everything. No, our President wasn't impeached because she "stood up to american interests" she was impeached because she was ruining the country. Bolsonaro wasn't elected because dumb brazilian people were influenced by americans voting for trump - They didn't want the other guy to win because he is fromm the same party as the President that was impeached and the President before her that was guilty of corruption and turned the country into a socialist hellhole.

Dilma was tortured, but not before her impeachment how this person seems to want to make it look like. It was when she was young more than 30+ years ago. It has nothing to do with anything she wrote.

tl;dr Yes, americans are self-centered. No, the nasty attitude she's describing is of the left virtue signalling, not of americans in general. You don't know shit about your own country politics and wants to suck commie dick.
 
Capture.PNG
Capture2.PNG
Capture3.PNG
Capture4.PNG

Ok haha funny yes, but I just gotta say about that retarded ass tweet... do those dimwits think two people already set on having consensual sex need a "message" on consent? If a rapist is going to rape, it's probably bareback and if it's not, they're putting it on so they don't accidentally catch any disease. If someone's already committed to the fucking soul crushing act. the victim saying "no stop I don't want this" is only for the court to prove you resisted and isn't going to stop them any. Maybe I'm just a fucking pessimist, who knows, but I don't think these people are going to have a "come to jesus" "that's not who i am" moment.
 
And then these people wonder why women don't feel comfortable sharing bathrooms/changing rooms with them

nTs7oBu.jpg
that's not very feminist of you. but also yes, how dare women fear you coming into their spaces when the label terf gets slapped on anyone who doesn't want to suck your dick and kiss your balls and you come off as an incredibly entitled person who thinks women should be broodmares? God you reek of mgtow incel ideology
Edit: lol troon brazenly admits he wants to be a better woman than women and only desires to beat rape and abuse women. Double edit: much femme wow, also it appears the account got nerfed.
 
Last edited:
Ok haha funny yes, but I just gotta say about that retarded ass tweet... do those dimwits think two people already set on having consensual sex need a "message" on consent? If a rapist is going to rape, it's probably bareback and if it's not, they're putting it on so they don't accidentally catch any disease. If someone's already committed to the fucking soul crushing act. the victim saying "no stop I don't want this" is only for the court to prove you resisted and isn't going to stop them any. Maybe I'm just a fucking pessimist, who knows, but I don't think these people are going to have a "come to jesus" "that's not who i am" moment.

Ehh, tiniest push-back I'll probably regret posting, but something like this does (in the cases where it would even be used, it seems more like a prototype or art piece meant to make a statement) potentially prevent situations where one (or both!) participants is too intoxicated/otherwise under the influence to meaningfully consent. Like, if we're not coordinated enough to open this thing (or one party isn't coordinated enough to help with a two handed semi-focused task), maybe this shouldn't happen. Not that it would necessarily be assault if both parties are super wasted (obviously if one is too drunk/etc to open a flimsy cardboard package and the other is fine that's assault), but probably not the best idea to fuck if you're too shit-wasted to get a paper puzzle box open.
 
Why would someone who doesn't give a shit about consent buy this? Wouldn't they just buy a normal condom? Or just raw dog up the ass and rinse out the evidence afterwards? What happens if there's two people wanting to fuck one non consenting party? Even in the event of this condom being the only option, couldn't they just threaten them with violence to get them to help open it? What if one person is an amputee? This shit is more retarded than the anti rape condom with razors inside.
 
Back