So is it ok when Ubisoft does it? This was a pre-order trailer for the express purpose of collecting money off of people. There are multiple major parts of the game they collected money based off of not present in the game, its not like it was just a graphics downgrade.
You WILL play with the xbox controller user, you WILL listen to the hispanic on the PS5's entire family yelling while trying to clear out the feminist cult compound, and you WILL enjoy it.
Please enlighten me, how does them saying "THE CONTENT WITHIN THIS VIDEO IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND IMPROVEMENT" have any relevancy.
it means they are saying "you are not getting the shit you are seeing" which means they are intentionally being untrustworthy. do not accept the promises of someone who tells you they have no intention of keeping them.
Every single pre-release game content and even alpha builds have that disclaimer it is a legal thing. While I don't think you should ever pre-order of course everything on release should be examined with the statements they made in previous trailers and teaser content. While they have the legal disclaimer they are clearly stating that "most of this content will be in the game in some form" otherwise they wouldn't say it. Also, saying it is a "game play" trailer implies that this content is already in a functional state in testing and is definitely a higher level of confidence then for example a dev mentioning some feature in an interview.
Only like 8 years after cutting it retard. The original ones are from like 2016/2017. While the blood doesnt look good I loved the brutal split flesh and exposed skull picture from a 2019 build they never released when multiplayer was still a consideration.
Anyone else think this is a reference to the tranch?
edit: nvm, they are just the typical british faggots. glad I didn't buy this.
If I'm not wrong, Left 4 Dead 2 had a censored version released for Australian audiences, and it was cross-play-able to normal L4D uncensored copy players. Having 2 different 'versions' of games that only have different assets, that are still compatible in multiplayer, is not a far-fetched, impossible idea. They probably can't do it cause of pure incompetence.
Eh, would be nice if it happened, but the chimp out was actually beneficial to Sony in the long run so they had good reason to give in, they basically went "I'm now not selling my game to many other regions because I want to boost PSN numbers", which is a incredibly stupid idea that shareholders would be pissed off at. It's like telling a die-hard capitalist "Hey, let's make less money for no reason".
First of all, fagstick, it's not a "Military Sim," it's a Police Sim. You saying that it's a Military Sim proves you never played it.
...So yes, the gritty and brutal realism is part of the intended experience.
helldivers is entirely different from VOID being lazy because it involved payment shit that wasn't clear, ultimately sony decided that backing down was the better course and now you don't need a hackedstation plus account to play nerfdivers 2 again.
See, I would agree with you, if the game didnt already pull this shit several times with the college shooting, the angry military guys taking over the hotel or the bday pedo party. Cause of that, this level loses whatever impact it had, you can tell me all you want how this is based on an IRL event or how horrible its supposed to be, it doesnt change that since they pulled this trick before, frankly this level is where I rolled my eyes the most over how many models are repeating, how the map is way too big and looks more like the club from John Wick 1, how the AI still has no chill (which I guess here it least makes mo sense since theyre crazy terrorists), how they send just 5 guys to cover this huge ass club, how the map lacks a 2nd or 3rd entry point.
5 seconds of the gayest soyest shit I've ever seen
even more than defending a chudtuber only to be called pathetic by the very same tuber?
