- Joined
- Apr 30, 2025
I can understand 24% being legal to allow people with shit credit and no money down at least some kind of car, if they need a car to go to work, but there is no reason new cars can be bought with such terms. You'd except 24% being allowed for a shitbox for a maximum of 24 months, to give someone a chance to get some sort of vehicle, not on a new car. At that point you legalized usury.That's precisely why it's 24%.
Houses appreciate in value (in general) which means they don't have to fill the depreciation hole when they repo. Although this kind of thinking caused the 2008 crisis. Houses always appreciated in value, therefore we can always just build more of them, and sell with with subprime loans (if they default you get a house that's more valuable, if they pay you get the interest).Even $500 down on a house would get you better terms.
I don't know, at the one hand: A fool and his money are easily parted, at the other hand: why allow banks to fuck people this hard, and possibly let them create another subprime loan crisis?










