Regarding legal action...

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
OBAMATRON said:
Protection Order, probably pretty easy to get. Chris comes near her or doxes her, he goes straight to jail.

I didn't know protection orders apply to doxing, just contact.

MrTroll said:
Does Chris even know, or could he get, her address or phone number?

He did before, or at least what he thought was them. I could see a weener sending them to him.
 
I think that Megan is probably smart enough to see Chris's BS for what it is. Her most fruitful course of action would be laughing at how pathetic and childish Chris is along w everyone else, and to view this latest round of tard rage as an affirmation of the wisdom in her decision to cut all ties with him.
 
Cwckifan said:
I don't know, Mr. Troll. I mean really, between him calling her a thieving bitch and saying she was (indirectly) involved in his father's death, it just seems like a legal goldmine. Really, he'd better hope that she never comes to any harm because of this, or else, well...
We find the defendant guilty of FELONY LEGO VOODOO and INTERNET INCOHERENCE! Off with his head!

Calm down.

Calling someone a bitch isn't a crime. Megan hasn't been damaged by Chris's lunatic ravings, and won't be unless someone in a position of influence (who, I have no idea) ran across his little essays and took him seriously. She could probably get his FB pulled, if she knew or cared, but the FBI / SWAT / SEAL Team 6 isn't going to come storming in Anytime Soon. He's not going to track her down and deliver a fatal curse-ye-ha-me-ha or anything; that would require effort, and it's much easier to achieve the same effect via Lego effigy abuse in the comfort of home.
 
'Calm down'?! How can I simply be expected to just 'Calm down' when someone is wrong on the internet?! This musn't be allowed to persist!

...

But yes, I see what you're saying; it's threating, but less 'Ted Bundy' and more 'Internet tough guy'
 
I don't know about Virginia or wherever Megan is, but you can sometimes get stalking/harassment protection orders. She doesn't have much of a case right now, but if Chris amps shit up she might.
 
somejerk said:
I think that Megan is probably smart enough to see Chris's BS for what it is. Her most fruitful course of action would be laughing at how pathetic and childish Chris is along w everyone else, and to view this latest round of tard rage as an affirmation of the wisdom in her decision to cut all ties with him.
I think it's highly likely Megan is completely unaware of Chris' latest freakout because she's moved on with her life and has a billion better things to do with it than look into what Chris is doing. (And what does that say about us?) It's been eight years, after all; she may not even bother to remember his full name any more. Hell, for all I know she may have gotten married and is no longer Megan Schroeder. And I will likely never know, because I don't care to know, because Megan is just another normal person and not worth obsessing over like what Chris is.

OBAMATRON said:
I don't know about Virginia or wherever Megan is, but you can sometimes get stalking/harassment protection orders. She doesn't have much of a case right now, but if Chris amps shit up she might.
She probably has enough for a no-contact order at the very least. The ShecameforCWC.JPG rape threat "explanation" and Chris' current freakout are probably more than enough to get a judge to err on the side of caution and issue at least a temporary order. And even a very limited and very temporary order would be enough to piss off Chris because any order restricting him in even the mildest way would be unacceptable to him; the specifics wouldn't matter.

But Megan probably doesn't know and probably doesn't care. See above.
 
A-№1 said:
somejerk said:
I think that Megan is probably smart enough to see Chris's BS for what it is. Her most fruitful course of action would be laughing at how pathetic and childish Chris is along w everyone else, and to view this latest round of tard rage as an affirmation of the wisdom in her decision to cut all ties with him.
I think it's highly likely Megan is completely unaware of Chris' latest freakout because she's moved on with her life and has a billion better things to do with it than look into what Chris is doing.
Oh no doubt. I'm just saying that because the OP is about Megan persuing legal action, which implies awareness. I agree that the idea is moot since Megan is probably has no clue about any of this.
 
somejerk said:
A-№1 said:
somejerk said:
I think that Megan is probably smart enough to see Chris's BS for what it is. Her most fruitful course of action would be laughing at how pathetic and childish Chris is along w everyone else, and to view this latest round of tard rage as an affirmation of the wisdom in her decision to cut all ties with him.
I think it's highly likely Megan is completely unaware of Chris' latest freakout because she's moved on with her life and has a billion better things to do with it than look into what Chris is doing.
Oh no doubt. I'm just saying that because the OP is about Megan persuing legal action, which implies awareness. I agree that the idea is moot since Megan is probably has no clue about any of this.

There's a pretty good chance that an epic ween kid or a concerned troll has already contacted Megan about this.
 
Dr RobotDick said:
Taken from a legal website regarding online threats:
To constitute "a communication containing a threat" under Section 875(c), a communication must be such that a reasonable person (1) would take the statement as a serious expression of an intention to inflict bodily harm (the mens rea), and (2) would perceive such expression as being communicated to effect some change or achieve some goal through intimidation (the actus reus). A message is a "threat" if a reasonable recipient would tend to believe that the originator of the message was serious about his words and intended to effect the violence or other harm forewarned, regardless of the speaker's actual motive for issuing the communication.

Being as Chris didn't make any direct threats of violence or harm.

Even as crazy as Chris is, he's smart enough to throw in a couple weasel words like "I wish someone [else] would [do horrific shit]."
 
In law school we just went over a libel lawsuit that occurred through the internet. In short, the plaintiff had no case. Basically, CWC can be a SLANDEROUS TROLL all he wants. Megan hasn't even acknowledged any offense, and if she does (for some reason), CWC's defense is reasonable. He didn't avail himself in Megan's home state, he doesn't even have Megan added as a friend, so one could argue that the behavior was not at all directed toward her (even though it clearly is). Also, wherever Facebook is incorporated will play a factor.
 
raymond said:
There's a pretty good chance that an epic ween kid or a concerned troll has already contacted Megan about this.
I think it's more likely that Megan has been screening her calls and email for a long time because of years of epic ween kids and is probably very good at it by now. I'm sure ween kids have tried, but were hung up on or deleted somewhere around the second syllable. Even if one of them does manage to blurt out the current Chris news highlights she'll discount and ignore it as just more shit from that creepy guy from all those years ago. What was his name again? Oh who cares.
 
MrTroll said:
His FB outbursts are really just the internet equivalent of a maniac standing on a street corner with a loudspeaker screaming about conspiracies.

Holy crap, why didn't we see it before? Megan was working with the Illuminati because they knew Chris' free spiritedness would be a grievous threat on their new world order. The lizard people hatched a brilliant scheme to make Chris appear to be malicious in order to pursue their goal of world domination. Only then could Lord Xeno obtain the power of super novas.

tl/dr version:

image.png
 
Libel was mentioned, but not stalking. He's shown a clear and persistent pattern of tracking down those he doesn't like.
Pretty sure Megan would have to be the one to complain about this though.
 
shutupman said:
Libel was mentioned, but not stalking. He's shown a clear and persistent pattern of tracking down those he doesn't like.
Pretty sure Megan would have to be the one to complain about this though.

I don't think he's ever stalked anyone before.
 
Believe it or not, Holodek is correct. Really, being creepily persistent and stagnant isn't stalking, no matter how odd
 
Cwckifan said:
Believe it or not, Holodek is correct. Really, being creepily persistent and stagnant isn't stalking, no matter how odd

He's gotten a restraining order placed on him previously by Snyder. His routinely following the guy around and going to his store after he's been banned could be seen as stalking.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom