Regarding the apparent and imminent repeal of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the future of this website.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
While true, the United States has the biggest military budget on the planet and the strongest armed forces, Europe was more than grateful for most of the 2nd part of the 20th century. Marshall Plan is in part what drove the American economy in the 50s and 60s, because you suddenly received unfettered access to the market that was starving and was literally beginning you to sell them shit, and sell you did.
So shut the fuck up already.
But Europeans on the internet are mean to me about it so I want to see your entire continent suffer. Especially Sweden.

 
If you think that JFK had a cult - think again. He was a gangster paddy with a boyish face. It takes a special kind of retard to set both the glowies and the old money against you and working together. That kind of retard can never create a cult of personality.

It's always struck me as weird that boomers across the map suck JFK's dick like he was the second coming of Christ. I have family that would openly criticize the admiration Obama and his family got during his administration, yet not recognize they felt the exact same way about JFK.
 
It's always struck me as weird that boomers across the map suck JFK's dick like he was the second coming of Christ. I have family that would openly criticize the admiration Obama and his family got during his administration, yet not recognize they felt the exact same way about JFK.
I think people want to be in a cult they just can't admit it.
 
But Europeans on the internet are mean to me about it so I want to see your entire continent suffer. Especially Sweden.

View attachment 1786906
You're too ironic and light-hearted, I can't even be righteously butthurt about your opinion. Awwww. I'm almost tempted to post a cat picture because you're just being too nice to me not seeing you being ironic.

I am an autist.
 
You're too ironic and light-hearted, I can't even be righteously butthurt about your opinion. Awwww. I'm almost tempted to post a cat picture because you're just being too nice to me not seeing you being ironic.

I am an autist.
Sunday night is almost over. I've got to retrofit 36 PTACs this week.

I just want to post stuff while I still can. :'(
 
Sounds to me like Trump is trying to piss off the dems so bad they will punish the Rebubs for this. Because he's vindictive because the Repubs are abandoning him in droves
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Tastes Like Power
I will make no comment on American politics because I'm a yuro and my opinion on your politics is irrelevant, even if I wanted to comment on it.

What I do want to comment about is how adorably culty both sides of the aisle in America are. And I knooow, it's just a manifestation of human tribalism, everyone does it but like, Europe has had like, two massive inoculations against cults of the personality and while history has never deterred retards from repeating it, I think guys that you really need to experience the depth and breadth of a cult of personality to viscerally understand just how trashy it is.
It's so genuinely sad but yet adorable how lamenting you are that oh my gosh, politicians do not have your best interests at heart, bureaucracy will do everything in its' power to perpetuate itself at your expense and the shocker - that if a politician promises people things they crave doesn't mean that you have to vote for that person or slobber their dick for X amount of years.

Then again, there are genuine lovers of Stalin in my country, so I'm the one to talk.
The thing with Europe is, there is no real opposition in terms of media. Well, maybe that's not true in 100% of cases, but generally my impression of Europe is that it is ideologically very homogenous. Some countries have government-financed TV (although they don't call it that) which most people think of as "reputable and independent" (ironic), similar to how liberal Americans might perceive CNN. But there's no equivalent to Fox, so the mainsream debate is very very one-sided, which creates the appearance of peace. There is little conflict because one side of the debate has basically an absolute monopoly. There is no "counterweight" to balance out and reveal the lies and shortcomings of the established media, because the established media is all there is. In America you have both sides pointing out each other's bullshit, which is rather healthy imo, but also creates more outward conflict, creating a less civilized appearance of sorts.
 
And because Twitter put bad boy stickers on some of his tweets. Bad boy stickers that probably barely make a difference in how he's perceived.
Gotta sperg about this a little: those bad boy stickers are already not covered by Section 230. Twitter published it themselves and if there's anything actionable in them Twitter is 100% responsible for the content. So he's threatening to nuke the entire internet over something he could absolutely already file a SLAPP suit over.
Honestly I think Biden is just talking about since Trump is. Give it 6 months into office and it will never be talked about again.
The trick is that the Dems want a responsibility to moderate while Repubs want liability if any moderation happens. That's a decent gulf to cross if the Senate remains 52-46+2 in favor of Repubs. Still holding out hope for something narrowly tailored to hit Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, and maybe Reddit and leave the rest of the internet alone. Hopefully that's the only way that it'll pass an opposition congress. Or it'll get ignored cause Dems have the executive branch now and they don't care once POTUS isn't REEEing on Twitter 24/7.
 
I agree to a point that a citizen of one country can’t 100% understand on a deep level the frustrations of another, but in America’s case we’re notorious for not understanding our own legal system so I personally don’t mind when other people comment on it if they know what they’re talking about. Besides, we tend to give more than our two cents constantly on international politics whether we understand it or not so it cool.
I routinely talk shit about UK politics and won't ever apologize about doing that. You can call me a dumbass or a stupid motherfucker or point out I'm an American and mock me for that, too, but it's really not a valid criticism of someone's opinion about politics that it's in a country they don't live in. It's pure ad hominem in the truest sense of the phrase. It's fallacious.

Now, why might people have an opinion about American politics despite not living here? Well one obvious reason is we're the biggest swinging dick in the entire fucking world. So shit that goes on here actually affects people elsewhere.
 
I will. In detail actually. This is the perspective of someone fluent in both the English and Chinese language, active on both sides of the GFW.

CPC official accounts are being mean to Trump.

Also after the covid trash, lots of CPC officials used their accounts to spread apologetic arguments on the Chinese state's behalf.

After the Russia boogeyman summoned by the retarded Democrats didn't work, the Trump administration decided to bring up a new one, which is China. I've been in and out of the country for many years, never have I see CPC officials engaging in autistic shit-slinging on Twitter in such a prolific manner. Biggest offender is 趙立堅 Zhao, who tweeted the "possibility of American soldiers bringing covid which was developed in a USA military lab into Wuhan military Olympics", which is a disproved retarded conspiracy. This moron is one of the several official CPC spokesmen. People in China who spreaded this shit were reprimanded. The difference here is wording, Zhao said there's a possibility. So Implied VS passing it on as fact.

Then on Axios, another high ranking CPC member Cui Tiankai was interviewed. He is the Chinese ambassador, which represents the state unlike Zhao. The interviewer pressed on Zhao's implications, Cui responded with "he is accountable for what he says and I don't need to disavow", effectively using an individualist argument when he belongs to a unitary party called the "United Front". The United Front is a composition of 8 Chinese parties, some are leftist progressive, some nationalist, current leader is the CPC which is nationalist. Basically, it's a collectivist party with an ideology based on collectivism (Chinese style Socialism, Xi Jinping thought). Quite interesting. Two things, people ignore individualism when it comes to Chinese officials which isn't smart, but Chinese officials conveniently making an individualist argument is stupid too.

Now, Twitter will mark accounts as "officially Chinese". I don't think any other country's official accounts are marked this way, besides the three big badies.
View attachment 1786136View attachment 1786140
View attachment 1786141

So after all this shit, it should be good to go right? Twitter for all their censorship aside, they are trying to be transparent and doing background checks. Trump's side isn't happy, they want more. People making their own decisions and a tiny bit of research? Fuck that, Twitter is important you see.

If you go to any pro-Trump base, such as the comments section of Fox News and boomer Facebook pages, find yourself an article about China or Russia, and you will see retards flinging shit. Arguments such as "230 is what allows Twitter to get away with hosting information presented by [country I don't like, China or Russia usually], so it should be revoked", then followed by something along the lines of misinformation and cyber-security. As if these boomers know anything about it.

Then, Twitter decided to "spoiler" one of Trump's tweets.
View attachment 1786146

Sending the national guards, to crack down on protesters, many which are thuggish? Military suppression? Where have I seen that before?
View attachment 1786149
Either way, pretty shitty optics there Orange Man. CPC wants to forget this shitshow that happened 30 years ago, I'm sure none of us wants to see something similar, even though most would love to see ANTIFA being thrown in a dumpster and egged. I know I would, fuck them. After this, China developed a branch called "armed police", which is similar to the riot police we have, specifically to deal with such large scale civil unrest.

Censorship is gay, but implying military crackdown on a bunch of retards is pretty gay too. I don't think Twitter should have censored it via a spoiler, doing what they do now is fine. People will mention ANTIFA faggots inciting violence towards people to the right of Joseph Stalin and Twitter not caring, that's just being myopic. If Joe Biden was making such tweets, I'm sure Twitter will censor it. Who cares about some nobody trust funded faggot being puppeteered by the uberkike that is Soros and their tweet with like 20 likes?

Of course, the usually totally alternate media such as Breitbart and dailywire (readers should use the wire to hang themselves) begun to suck Trump's orange cock, just like the few official CPC account sucking the red cock. This triggered Trump so much, he whinged about unfairly being censored.

Tweets by literal whos? Even one literal who checkmark with less than 1k likes. Dailywire can't seem to comprehend the difference between inciting military action coming from the president and supporting the riots or trying to justify it.

This one should be ovened:
View attachment 1786184
The rest? This is peak grift right journalism, alternate media guys, totally not MSM levels of shit.

Either way, Trump got triggered. Now his eyes are on Section 230. I'm going to get it wrong because I come from a place that huffs petrol. To my understanding, Section 230 is what makes the internet fun, unlike Chinanet. Section 230 allows this site to exist. Without 230, Western Internet is defacto Chinanet, and will inevitably become the same thing or worse.

Basically, the host isn't accountable for what the users say as long as it's covered by the first amendment. I have rights to call someone I dislike a faggot nigger, and get called one in return. If any of the cows throw a hissy and conjure up some literary abomination of a lawsuit, Nool can tell them to fuck themselves and throw 230 at them. "I didn't say it, it's NaggotFigger1488" whatever, "go get him, oh and good luck finding him". Without 230, cows can just summon frivolous lolsuits and whoever runs the site must respond. This is an utter logistical and economical nightmare.

How does Chinanet work? Basically, if you have an audience of over 99, you are tangentially accountable for what the other people say. It is up to you to moderate speech with accordance to Chinese laws. This means no deliberate criticism of the government, no separatism, and a myriad of other gay shit such as harassment and even doXxxing from your little group. If there's offenders, you should warn them and retract what they say, and ban them if it's that bad. If a "rumour" you created spreads to over 500 people, the police might come and have a word with you. I know people who have been reprimanded this way. They check your phone for VPNs and you sign some shit saying you won't do it again. I heard this isn't enforced at all, which means the cops mostly won't even care, they will just look and go on with real crimes. Either way, it's gay, it's very authoritarian, it's incredibly Chinese. Look at how Singapore is ran too, very similar, very gay.

I think it's worse, because on Chinanet, they don't give a shit if we call Ethan Oliver Ralph a nigger or Dax Herrera a paedophile. Say what you want, just don't be mean to the CPC or break separatism laws. Call someone a faggot or a queer, deny someone's dumb pronouns, and be racist all you like. If we don't have 230, you might get into trouble for all this, plus potentially the government can just fuck with media outlets to get rid of stuff they don't like.

At least now, something better than Twitter might exist in the future. Without 230, the barrier of entry to running a social media site becomes astronomically fucking high, suddenly, some idiot calling another person a nigger could get you into trouble for reluctancy in censorship. This leaves Facebook and Twitter with effectively a duopoly on social media.

I'd like to bring up the election too, where each of Trump's cope and drivel coming from his cocksuckers were marked as "disputed". I don't like this, it's nanny as fuck, and I live in a nannystate that stole our guns and rights away while selling our shit to British, American and most importantly, Chinese companies that doesn't give a shit about us. I don't need Twitter to tell me that orange man is coping hard. This autistic rant is already too long.

tl;dr
Trump is a faggot, cry more orange nigger. CPC official accounts and verified nobody blue checks should bully him some more.
230 gives me right to call you a nigger, so it should stay.
Attacking 230 is attacking the First Amendment, makes you a worthless subhuman. Oh, what comes after the First Amendment? Get fucked.
Twitter should censor all the MIGApedes who want 230 gone for hate speech, transphobia, misusing pronouns, and most importantly, for being worse than a fag. They are a private company, they can do what they want.

NIGGER CHINK SPIK FAGGOT
TFW China the supposed "Most Oppresing Country on Earth" will has more freedom than you if Trump, and his literal braindead cultists, got their way
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back