- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Lol you probably believe this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol you probably believe this.
I think this is entirely possible, just based on how Trump usually operates. A lot of his Twitter posting is just big talk that isn't often backed by action. I still expect 230 to eventually get trashed, but I give it a couple more years at least. Immediate action and government don't exactly mix.He’s not, it’s just one last empty threat. He threatened to veto these bills over the base renaming, and that’s already been forgotten about.
You vote for biden when he says he's gonna repeal 230, then cry about Trump doing the same thing.
Lefty twitter won't be as fun if you can't make death threats and spin false stories about Republicans and right leaning celebrities.
I cannot express my frustration at people, even "well informed" people like Nick Fuentes, who think CDA230 has anything to do with criminal enforcement of anything. I don't know how to spoonfeed any more so I won't bother.There will be a basement threshold on enforcement you fall well below.
In a way, it kind of does have to do with freedom of speech. Just not freedom from the government censoring you. It's freedom from any Russel, Karen, or Greta censoring via litigation.Section 230 has nothing to do with free speech. It is a protection for sites so they don't get slammed with a lawsuit when Ted says "damn my neighbor Tom is a real pedophile", if you think removing a protection will make the current climate your a retard who needs to be shot.
Everyone here hates A&H and the board deserves to be deleted if retards like you will slip in here and say "muh trump good, muh biden bad"
i like how most of the fans of trump, forget that trump used to be a member of DNC/ Democrat party.I'm fairly sure people who voted for biden did not vote for biden so he could repeal 230, just like people didn't vote for trump so he could repeal 230. The presidents aren't a cult, we can agree with some of their choices and disagree with others.
because CNN and fox news (television so it's outside of 230) never spin false stories and still despite being sued manages to survive because get this, they have lawyers and money to protect them.
There is nothing to gain here by trump, this is not a 3d chess move, there is NO gains at all for anyone right wing here.
Ya know I was going to again bring up the tech sphere lobbying element into why the gubmint will likely be even slower than normal in doing anything about section 230, but it literally just occured to me that there might be another possibly even more influential force who would want to kill this shit in the budI think this is entirely possible, just based on how Trump usually operates. A lot of his Twitter posting is just big talk that isn't often backed by action. I still expect 230 to eventually get trashed, but I give it a couple more years at least. Immediate action and government don't exactly mix.