Resident Evil - Virgin Vampire Wine Mom vs Chad Magnetic Lebowski

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A lot of the Anderson movies seemed like they served as a vehicle for "my wife is hot, look at my wife, she is hot" which is true but honestly they're what I would generally call 'fun', not groundbreaking cinema or anything but who the fuck expected that out of a movie based on a video game? Or maybe I'm just blinded by nostalgia because I saw them when they released and I was just excited to see RE characters on the big screen, even if they were woefully mischaracterized and doing retarded shit or in a location that would have been canonically impossible.

Though they certainly dragged on a while. Not quite on par with The Walking Dead, but Paul milked the fuck out of it.

Lets get this out of the way, the Anderson movies arent good. But there is a "complexity" to it if that makes any sense because they do tend to have a variable rate of "quality". What I mean is that every entry tends to at least have something "memorable", dystinct and I dare even say objectively enjoyable about it (not that this redeems the whole experience, mind you).

I tend to have a guilty pleasure for the first three movies, mostly because the first one was a competent zombie movie with some RE-esque things but, as an adaptation, it didnt seem to TAKE anything away from the source material (thats for the sequels) and the first two sequels did engage me with what they did which, again, felt so dettached from the source material that I dont think I took as seriously anymore than, say, a fanfiction.

And thats a good way of putting it, these movies are more akin to fanfiction than full on adaptations. And you can even call them, at their worst, charming time capsule movies where you could still enjoy it if you didnt put too much thought in it as they clearly didnt take themselves seriously at all (so, bizarrely, they did embrace RE's B-movie esque nature better than any other adaptation, even better than some of the RE engine remakes even). In fanfictions, you just have the source material characters appear, ocassionally help the main lead, more often than not a self insert, and get written out either by dying or leaving and never returning with no explanation (cuz the author likely forgot or didnt think of a good enough way to bring them back). But you can tell that, at worst, this is just a fan's harmless self expression that isnt actively insulting the source material...it is just pretty dismissable in the end.

And as a quick side note, I legit this it is movies like these and, say, Underworld, that reaffirm that the whole "girl boss" thing really was a pretty modern phenomena as you'd expect these two movie franchises to be girl boss franchises but, surprisingly, they arent (they might be "mary sue" franchises but not girl boss ones if that makes any sense) and you rarely see them being brought up when the usual suspects are saying there are no "female heroes". It is just a stronger reminder of just how artificial and astroturfed the whole thing is.

Apocalypse had the ocassional glimpse of "Oh, I caught that" moments where they did try to replicate some scenes and details from RE3. I also did enjoy the chaos of R.C and idk how, but the zombies just felt pretty damn threatening in the first three movies, so having so many of them was could feel unnerving.
Nemesis wasnt GOOD but if I had to play Devil's Advocate, he had the potential if they had just stuck closer with the source material because he was pretty decent design wise (I much prefer it than the remake's). Its like they had the right idea but thats it.
And some of the action scenes are alright. Again, Im very sure it was cool for our kid selves and our adult selves know that these movies arent high art so our expectations are more realistic.
Apocalypse still kept a RE-esque feeling, even if the quality wasnt objectively as good. And it just engaged me so I cant really hate it much.

Extinction is an interesting case because one might say this is where the franchise officially went tits up when it came to adapt anything about this series properly. You could make the argument the first two movies had at least the base of RE1-3 in their DNA but this one is where the "fanfiction-ness" of this series went off the rails.
But with that said, I cant hate this entry much as well because I guess I am a sucker for the Mad Max with zombies approach they went with, even if it has nothing to do with RE and, hell, it feels more TWD-esque even tho that brand wasnt a thing yet. Feels like there was a more standalone movie here rather than a sequel. Ironically I prefered to watch the adventures of the convoy of survivors instead of the Alice stuff. Again, I wont sit here and preach how the haters are wrong but I'd be lying if something about its style and personality didnt win me over, even if the character aspect didnt. Kind of makes me wish a talented director took a shot at this "Zombies in the desert" concept (and no, Army of the Dead doesnt count)
It just feels like there was a movie worth of events in between Apocalypse and Extinction that would have been neat to at least see some of it but it is all reduced to exposition at the narration. Characters just disappear (with the novels doing a LOT of heavy lifting here) with no explanation and we know this is hardly the first time this will happen.

Now why I dont feel the same for Afterlife onward? Well, three reasons I think

1- The special effects became far more CG heavy and if there is one thing I can say is that the makeup and effects were all mostly real and my brain just appreciated that "real" aspect to it.
2- Plot became far more bonkers and I know you might argue it was bonkers before, especially by Extinction but you felt like the first three were at least TRYING to maintain some aspect of groundedness, at least compared to the sequels set afterwards. Afterlife starts with Alice getting "depowered" apparently but she is still able to do the OP acrobatics she could do at least since Apocalypse but they never specificy it was to remove the psychic powers.
3- I just really kind of outgrew these movies, I watched 1 and 2 a lot on cable and watched 3 on cinemas so I suppose I had some sort of attachment but by 4, I guess all the negatives just caught on to me and I moved on.

Still, do I hate these movies? Not really, they are just dumb popcorn movies and I kind of miss a bit of this style early 2000's had, especially with gothic action movies like R.E.

And say whatever you want, they dont make me eye rollingly ANNOYED like Welcome to Raccoon City and especially the Netflix had and any nigger unironically saying they are "at least better" in comparison deserves the slop they get.

Dont know what this new movie will be like and I do legit hope it will be at least decent enough and with adaptations, thats all you can really hope for.

Edit:

Yo, wtf!?

 
Last edited:
So what I'm gathering from this trailer is that Zach Cregger made a zombie movie and then slapped the words "Resident Evil" on it to sell.

Capcom needs to restrict the movie rights immediately because the closest thing we have to an actual RE film is Welcome to Raccoon City and, like, half of Resident Evil Apocalypse.
 
Director wants to claim this happens during the Raccoon city incident, yet it's full on snowing in what should be September in an adjacent area
It's very obvious that this is going to be an In-Name-Only kind of deal. He can't even use the "It's like RE7" excuse that larpers are pumping out because it's explicitly supposed to be the Raccoon City outbreak.

Look I can forgive an adaptation telling an original story, the actual problem here is that when you take away Umbrella, the actual characters, the BOWs, and the goofy nonsense, you're just left with generic people fighting zombies
 
Besides them, I think the Hunters can obey orders?
Hunters have the intelligence of a dog, the frog hunters in 3make are intelligent enough to form emotional attachments.

Cerberus is a dog and you summon it with a dog whistle in remake, so I assume it's intelligent enough to be trained?

Zombies are exactly what you'd expect, release a few in a high population environment, let it sort itself out.

The cleaners from Sheena Island are capable of following orders.

And tyrants and nemesis can be programmed, but with nemesis, it's like a computer and can become scuffed and need to be reprogrammed. (If you want to consider Operation raccoon city canon. )
 
What the fuck? This looks BAD! And most of the comments on X is asking "Where is Leon?" lol!
So what happened is, is that Zach Cregger didn't care about Resident Evil at all and was going to make this movie whether he had the IP or not. He was very clear about this.

Here is his response video.


Now here is where we get his cope and attempts to shove a square peg in a round hole. This is just not Resident Evil. The stuff with the camera shots starts off okay, but the video devolves as we move on. Here are some of my favorite moments:

>He just straight up says at one point that the fat guy in the sewer is a Blood Meridian ripoff and has nothing to do with Resident Evil.

>There is no Nemesis/tyrants. So whatever that thing is, it isn't a tyrant.

>That monster in the door? Yes, Zach. That is in the games. Except it's the wrong game. That's from Evil Within.

>Searching the drawers is a classic Resident Evil staple.

>This is in the early few minutes of Raccoon City. Shit just happened.

>"I'm not clear on the timeline of Raccoon City and when it starts to when it gets nuked. But this is when it just starts." Don't you think that's important to know?

>Oh yeah...this random houseplant? That's a *checks notes* Green Herb from Resident Evil 4. We copied the pot from 4. (Pots look completely different) And that's one of the many Easter eggs.....

>There's not many zombies in this movie.

>"I feel like we have so many opportunities with the T Virus to do more things with crazy mutations..."...No Zach, you don't. The T Virus doesn't work that way. What does work that way is the G VIRUS. Which conveniently occurs during Raccoon City exclusively. Which also conveniently lurks in the SEWERS of Raccoon City. Where you are currently setting what appears to be the CLIMAX OF YOUR MOVIE.
GOD DAMNIT ZACH ALL YOU HAD TO WAS SLAP A PINK EYEBALL ON THE FUCKING FAT GUY AND WE COULD LIVE WITH IT. FUCK MAN.

>"The scariest part of the games was 8 where you're getting chased by the giant baby". Oh, you mean the dreamlike sequence that's not the T Virus and has nothing to do with Raccoon City?

Fuck me, man. I hated this faggot for Barbarian. He redeemed himself with Weapons. I'm back to hating him again. Just admit you only played 4, 7, and 8 and had half the movie done before you got the IP and I will let it go.....
 
Look I can forgive an adaptation telling an original story, the actual problem here is that when you take away Umbrella, the actual characters, the BOWs, and the goofy nonsense, you're just left with generic people fighting zombies
Except there won't be zombies. This is not zombie movie. There's no zombies to be had. I'm convinced Cregger never played 1-3. He only probably played 4, 7, and 8 like every other modern casual fan. He has no idea what the T Virus is. He has no idea what happens during Raccoon City or why it happens. This script was written long before they ever had the IP. The IP was just a tool for marketing and to get the movie made. He was making this same movie regardless of whether he ever got the IP or not. Don't be surprised if there's no mention of Umbrella. Or if the plot is bare bones because it's probably supposed to be very generic.
 
Who the fuck is buying Lickers from Umbrella?
The same retard who bought a zombie shark.
You guys have to remember, most of the more bizarre BOWs and other creations of the Umbrella and the T Virus were made by complete accident. The Lickers were a mutation to a specific strain of T Virus. It was a further devolution of the normal transformation. Neptune came a single surviving T Virus shark that had babies. They were going to clone them but said fuck it, nah and they got out during the Arklay disaster.
 
You guys have to remember, most of the more bizarre BOWs and other creations of the Umbrella and the T Virus were made by complete accident. The Lickers were a mutation to a specific strain of T Virus. It was a further devolution of the normal transformation. Neptune came a single surviving T Virus shark that had babies. They were going to clone them but said fuck it, nah and they got out during the Arklay disaster.
this, and one of the more effective BOW.s they had, the Marcus Leeches, they dumped in the sewer and overlooked them, to disasterous results.

Umbrella was more a "can we do it" than "should be we do it" company, anything against the wall to see if it sticks, and hey, after that just dump it wherever.
 
this, and one of the more effective BOW.s they had, the Marcus Leeches, they dumped in the sewer and overlooked them, to disasterous results.

Umbrella was more a "can we do it" than "should be we do it" company, anything against the wall to see if it sticks, and hey, after that just dump it wherever.
You've just reminded me of Wicked Seed, where yes, a pharmaceutical company is involved with the eldritch horrors... but only because they're trying to extract potential drugs from the fucked-up flora and fauna they spawn and then reverse-engineer them into a synthetic form that can be safely created in medical laboratories.

Or you know, standard pharmaceutical company morals as opposed to anything Umbrella got up to.
 
Back
Top Bottom