MidZeRo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2021
It wouldn't be. Discovery is narrowly tailored to the specific concerns and complaints held within the actual suit. This is specifically to prevent Lawfare and protect bystanders. MAYBE they could request the info of the OP for the CSAM allegations to prove its true and win, but then they'd also have to prove that it is necessary or relevant to whether or not the person in the photo was under age at the time.That's the thing: how is me talking about computers in the tech thread mean you get to have my info (what little is on here)? You'd need a good reason to hand over that type of data.
Theyd also be fucked because they state later that it doesn't matter to them whether or not it IS CSAM just that they don't like it. Which is pretty reckless as far as Defimation goes.
To be fair it ALSO worked on the court that decided the suit against Josh was valid AND get the appeals court to ignore him. So it's clear this shit works as long as whoever is whining is of homsexual comportment. This may be a direct response to that. These people are watching this happen in real time and using whatever works.Jesus Christ
Don't these retards realize the legal cesspool they are in?
Don't they understand that there is a huge LEGAL difference between child porn and some 19 coomer degenerate?
They should be saying "the retard who made this post was fired, we retract our accusations and apologize".
But instead, they are trying to use the "yeah, we lied, but that's OK because you are a morally wrong, and therefore we have the right to lie about you and destroy you and your business" argument
This emotional manipulation shit only works on your average woke c*lifornian homosexual, who they deal with daily, but not on internet autists or a court of law