Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Krokodil Overdose]

Predator sperging and more terrible ideas.
View attachment 509778 View attachment 509782

If they're using the Latin, it's -ix. If they're not using the Latin, it's whatever the hell they decide. Question answered in one tweet with enough chars left over to call Bob fat.

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

If they're using the Latin, it's -ix. If they're not using the Latin, it's whatever the hell they decide. Question answered in one tweet with enough chars left over to call Bob fat.

I have no idea if some of the novels are canon, but aren't female yautja (Predators) like 1.5-2x the size of the males? As in, males actually have to be careful during mating season lest they get seriously hurt?

There was a novel from the perspective of one yautja who'd encountered a human female and couldn't figure out why she was so small.

Also, that hunting humans was very much 'most dangerous game' territory even for the yautja -- seems they'd developed a little respect for us hairless apes, so they didn't take just anybody along on their skull-collecting trips. Yautja actually had to qualify for the hunt (I wonder if there was testing involved, and if it was written as well as practical. ).

 

[Flexo]

I have no idea if some of the novels are canon, but aren't female yautja (Predators) like 1.5-2x the size of the males? As in, males actually have to be careful during mating season lest they get seriously hurt?

There was a novel from the perspective of one yautja who'd encountered a human female and couldn't figure out why she was so small.

Also, that hunting humans was very much 'most dangerous game' territory even for the yautja -- seems they'd developed a little respect for us hairless apes, so they didn't take just anybody along on their skull-collecting trips. Yautja actually had to qualify for the hunt (I wonder if there was testing involved, and if it was written as well as practical. ).

Yes that would be some of the actual lore as there's a lot of signs that the yautja might even be descended from a reptilian line (as we are descended from a mammalian) and in reptiles (and birds) the females are larger so it would fit.

And fuck Bob et al for trying to bring our gender politics and petty squabbles into an alien world. It's just a sign of how small their imaginations are (and why i think they hate Lovecraft - less for his racism and more because his writing makes them feel small).

 

[A Watchful Ghost]

Hell, I have a hard time believing that Bob is a true Marvel fan. He strikes me as someone who jumps onto a trend and acts like a fanatic, but the truth is that he has only a superficial knowledge of the characters outside of what the MCU. The only reason why he shills so hard for characters like Ms. Marvel or Miles Morales is because they align with his own opinions on diversity and not because he actually likes them.

To fans who have loved Marvel Comics for decades, he's a fucking poser.

If he shut the fuck up and admitted to his audience that he doesn't know shit about the comics. Then it wouldn't be as baffling to read. It's clear he doesn't know, nor care to understand why people are so fond of Marvel comics. He's just a poser that wants to hang with the cool kids yet does nothing to earn it.

 

[Godzilla@1989]

If he shut the fuck up and admitted to his audience that he doesn't know shit about the comics. Then it wouldn't be as baffling to read. It's clear he doesn't know, nor care to understand why people are so fond of Marvel comics. He's just a poser that wants to hang with the cool kids yet does nothing to earn it.

I strongly feel he’s also been a Star Wars poser as ever since The Force Awakens came out. The film might have been dog shit that set up the clusterfuck that was The Last Jedi but it align with Bob’s diversity pandering views. For the first time in his life, Bob loved Star Wars simply because it was using his politically corrected politics. I guarantee you Bob does not actually give a shit and know anything about the Star Wars universe, only that it is aligning with his political views.

 

[Positron]

Still salty about James Gunn.
View attachment 509447

What does the James Gunn shitshow have to do with believing women? Does Bobby mean that just because some women claimed Gunn has "repented" like some fucking male Mary Magdalene, Disney must take what they say at face value? How about those women who are genuinely disturbed by his many pedophilic tweets?

 

[Mola Ram]

What does the James Gunn shitshow have to do with believing women? Does Bobby mean that just because some women claimed Gunn has "repented" like some fucking male Mary Magdalene, Disney must take what they say at face value? How about those women who are genuinely disturbed by his many pedophilic tweets?

Y'know, I can't believe it took me this long to realize it, but all this James Gunn horseshit from him is nothing but the same dishonest, shallow thinking he demonstrated when comparing Anita Sarkeesian to Jack Thompson.

If you don't recall that episode, he differentiated them not by any variations in their arguments, but simply because Thompson was a right-winger and Sarkeesian had good intentions. That they both sought the same fundamental goal -- censorship of violent or allegedly misogynistic material in videogames -- he airily dismissed. It's one of the most brazen moments of his embrace of double standards, as he not only relied on such a nonsensical argument, but acted as though to even raise the question was absurd. (Head-tilting, looking at the camera like he was looking into a mental ward, you know the drill.)

It's the same thing here. James Gunn is a GOOD GUY. The New York Times is a GOOD GUY. Sarah Jeong is a GOOD POC. Therefore, anything they do is GOOD, and anybody who is BAD who does the same things must be destroyed.

So many big words; so little actual thinking.

 

[Dr. Dik]

Y'know, I can't believe it took me this long to realize it, but all this James Gunn horseshit from him is nothing but the same dishonest, shallow thinking he demonstrated when comparing Anita Sarkeesian to Jack Thompson.

If you don't recall that episode, he differentiated them not by any variations in their arguments, but simply because Thompson was a right-winger and Sarkeesian had good intentions. That they both sought the same fundamental goal -- censorship of violent or allegedly misogynistic material in videogames -- he airily dismissed. It's one of the most brazen moments of his embrace of double standards, as he not only relied on such a nonsensical argument, but acted as though to even raise the question was absurd. (Head-tilting, looking at the camera like he was looking into a mental ward, you know the drill.)

It's the same thing here. James Gunn is a GOOD GUY. The New York Times is a GOOD GUY. Sarah Jeong is a GOOD POC. Therefore, anything they do is GOOD, and anybody who is BAD who does the same things must be destroyed.

So many big words; so little actual thinking.

Yeah, Bob's entire M.O. is "no bad tactics, only bad targets".
That's what makes this James Gunn saga so funny. The right wing used his bad tactics against something he loved and he cannot find anyway to argue against it coherently.

 

[LastOfTheMohicans]

Says the king of tedious projects.
View attachment 509446

I feel like we glossed over this a little too easily.

In that last Tweet, did he actually try and put forth the argument that fucking Animal Farm isn't really a relevant or important work, but it could be made relevant by editing it to be about shitting on the working-class? Or basically a thinly veiled way of saying "Animal Farm needs to be edited to be about those dang Drumpfists!"

I'm racking my brain trying to be generous to him, but yet again I can't seem to find any working interpretation that's any better of that tweet.

 

[LordofCringe7206]

Hell, I have a hard time believing that Bob is a true Marvel fan. He strikes me as someone who jumps onto a trend and acts like a fanatic, but the truth is that he has only a superficial knowledge of the characters outside of what the MCU. The only reason why he shills so hard for characters like Ms. Marvel or Miles Morales is because they align with his own opinions on diversity and not because he actually likes them.

To fans who have loved Marvel Comics for decades, he's a fucking poser.

I strongly feel he’s also been a Star Wars poser as ever since The Force Awakens came out. The film might have been dog shit that set up the clusterfuck that was The Last Jedi but it align with Bob’s diversity pandering views. For the first time in his life, Bob loved Star Wars simply because it was using his politically corrected politics. I guarantee you Bob does not actually give a shit and know anything about the Star Wars universe, only that it is aligning with his political views.

Bob want's to maintain the fanboy/nerd persona without actually being a fan of the things he likes to talk about. If he was to only talk about things he's truly a fan of, his twitter would be nothing but tweets on Mario video games.

 

[Godzilla@1989]

Yeah, Bob's entire M.O. is "no bad tactics, only bad targets".
That's what makes this James Gunn saga so funny. The right wing used his bad tactics against something he loved and he cannot find anyway to argue against it coherently.

I got a feeling the right wing will use his bad tactics on either Iger or Kennedy next, though I imagine it’d be on Kennedy given the cluster fuck she gave Star Wars.

Bob want's to maintain the fanboy/nerd persona without actually being a fan of the things he likes to talk about. If he was to only talk about things he's truly a fan of, his twitter would be nothing but tweets on Mario video games.

He’s a moocher to pop culture properties that are relevant at the moment. Once his beloved MCU stops being popular at the moment, he’ll mooch on something else.

 

[BR55]

So let's place some bets.
We all know Bob's "Boycott" of Marvel is fucking toothless and he will be first in line to see the new movies.
But heres the question. Will he be so shameless as to go right back to unfiltered sperging and fanboyism? Or will he at least pretend to uphold his #RehireJamesGunn "Boycott" and try get his Marvel fix on the sly.
My moneys on the former.

 

[Mola Ram]

So let's place some bets.
We all know Bob's "Boycott" of Marvel is fucking toothless and he will be first in line to see the new movies.
But heres the question. Will he be so shameless as to go right back to unfiltered sperging and fanboyism? Or will he at least pretend to uphold his #RehireJamesGunn "Boycott" and try get his Marvel fix on the sly.
My moneys on the former.

I'm betting he'll slag the next Guardians of the Galaxy and lament what could have been if only Disney had kept the Pedo-Joker in their stable of directors. Might even rate it lower than Homecoming.

 

[Godzilla@1989]

So let's place some bets.
We all know Bob's "Boycott" of Marvel is fucking toothless and he will be first in line to see the new movies.
But heres the question. Will he be so shameless as to go right back to unfiltered sperging and fanboyism? Or will he at least pretend to uphold his #RehireJamesGunn "Boycott" and try get his Marvel fix on the sly.
My moneys on the former.

I’m betting that he’ll pretend to have his opinion on the movies change into negativ

 

[BR55]

I'm betting he'll slag the next Guardians of the Galaxy and lament what could have been if only Disney had kept the Pedo-Joker in their stable of directors. Might even rate it lower than Homecoming.

Nothing could be worse than Homecoming for Bob. After all it wasn't as good as the almighty Rami Trilogy... To Bob's nostalgia addled mind at least.

I’m betting that he’ll pretend to have his opinion on the movies change into negativ

If Bob actually starts giving Marvel some flak then I will actually burst out laughing. I mean think about it. Bob loves Marvel movies more than the actual real people in his.
He would essentially be shitting on what he loves most purely for Politisperg reasons.

 

[LordofCringe7206]

So let's place some bets.
We all know Bob's "Boycott" of Marvel is fucking toothless and he will be first in line to see the new movies.
But heres the question. Will he be so shameless as to go right back to unfiltered sperging and fanboyism? Or will he at least pretend to uphold his #RehireJamesGunn "Boycott" and try get his Marvel fix on the sly.
My moneys on the former.

Given that the next MCU film is Captain Marvel, I highly doubt he will want to boycott it. Much like he did with Black Panther, we all know he wants to let loose and sperg about it because a woman is going to be the main character of the movie. If it was any other movie than maybe I could envision it happening. Captain Marvel though, a golden opportunity to spread SJW talking points like evernote did with Black Panther? Fat chance.

Though I have a theory that I want to share: does anyone else think Bob is threatening to boycott Marvel because he's grown tired of it? For both Avengers and Ant-Man, he seemed to tone it down a little bit and not talk about them as much. Especially compared to Black Panther. He wasn't praising them as much and he even seemed to give some criticisms of Ant-Man and The Wasp.

I know it's most likely because Black Panther was a great opportunity to unleash SJW talking points and the other two MCU films this year weren't. But I wonder if Bob is actually growing tired of the MCU and he's using the James Gunn controversy as a vehicle to distance himself from them.

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

I know it's most likely because Black Panther was a great opportunity to unleash SJW talking points and the other two MCU films this year weren't. But I wonder if Bob is actually growing tired of the MCU and he's using the James Gunn controversy as a vehicle to distance himself from them.

Interesting theory, but when has he ever displayed this much guile? Now I'll give you that he might be getting tired of Marvel movies deep down- after all, when you watch the same formula 20+ times, you're gonna start to drift a bit- but I don't think he'd let himself admit that, given how he sees their popularity as his vehicle to push his petulant child politics. So it's "obviously" that they need more MUH REPRESENTATION MUH STRONG WAMMAN, it can't be that this has been going on for a decade at this point and it's getting stale.

 

[Positron]

Interesting theory, but when has he ever displayed this much guile? Now I'll give you that he might be getting tired of Marvel movies deep down- after all, when you watch the same formula 20+ times, you're gonna start to drift a bit- but I don't think he'd let himself admit that, given how he sees their popularity as his vehicle to push his petulant child politics. So it's "obviously" that they need more MUH REPRESENTATION MUH STRONG WAMMAN, it can't be that this has been going on for a decade at this point and it's getting stale.

Bobby did openly admit he found MCU formulaic, but it was done right after he praised MCU as some cultural watershed. He can hold two contradictory opinions in his vacuous cranium because he has no brain to analyse them. He will stick to MCU even if he is bored to the tears -- and will continue to convince himself it is all for the sake of Superior Future.

 

[Gordon Cole]

STILL not over James Gunn.

And just like any other social media freakout of his, here come the asskissers:

BONUS: If you've seen Sorry to Bother You, then .

I'm betting he'll slag the next Guardians of the Galaxy and lament what could have been if only Disney had kept the Pedo-Joker in their stable of directors. Might even rate it lower than Homecoming.

 

[Rathkor]

Y'know, I can't believe it took me this long to realize it, but all this James Gunn horseshit from him is nothing but the same dishonest, shallow thinking he demonstrated when comparing Anita Sarkeesian to Jack Thompson.

If you don't recall that episode, he differentiated them not by any variations in their arguments, but simply because Thompson was a right-winger and Sarkeesian had good intentions. That they both sought the same fundamental goal -- censorship of violent or allegedly misogynistic material in videogames -- he airily dismissed. It's one of the most brazen moments of his embrace of double standards, as he not only relied on such a nonsensical argument, but acted as though to even raise the question was absurd. (Head-tilting, looking at the camera like he was looking into a mental ward, you know the drill.)

It's the same thing here. James Gunn is a GOOD GUY. The New York Times is a GOOD GUY. Sarah Jeong is a GOOD POC. Therefore, anything they do is GOOD, and anybody who is BAD who does the same things must be destroyed.

So many big words; so little actual thinking.

Oh, I am VERY familiar with that episode. It was my question he was responding to. I loved Sargon of Akkad's reaction video to that, where he states exactly that sentiment. Instead of discussing how their ARGUMENTS differed (which is impossible, its the same arguments) he instead chose to argue how the people were different.

Me and my friends had a good chuckle over that video. First time we laughed while watching a MovieBob video ever.