Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's actually not a bad idea for a story. The only time Bob can help generate a good story is when people are trying to mock him.
Agreed, and I totally stole the idea from Detroit: Become Human which stole from Blade Runner and other Android sci-fi movies, also would Bob be a fan of David Cage? They have very similar ideas for “movies”
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Agreed, and I totally stole the idea from Detroit: Become Human which stole from Blade Runner and other Android sci-fi movies, also would Bob be a fan of David Cage? They have very similar ideas for “movies”
And then there is the movie, Bicentennial Man. Has Bob ever been a fan of Robin Williams?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Koby_Fish
It's honestly amazing how, with all the movie ideas he throws out, he's never once managed to hit on an interesting idea.
I disagree. Quite a few of his ideas are very interesting in a "The Room meets a North Korean propaganda film plus a billion pop culture references" absolute cringe-laden train wreck kinda way.
 
Wasn't the Game Anti-Thinker/Under-Thinker a not so subtle caricature of Razorfist?

Subtlety is not a thing Bob understands. The Anti-Thinker was Razorfist, every part of the dude's style copied down to the type font used for the intro. Didnt copy Razor's ideas though, as he used Razor's style to exemplify Xbox dudebros.
 
Wasn't the Game Anti-Thinker/Under-Thinker a not so subtle caricature of Razorfist?
Subtlety is not a thing Bob understands. The Anti-Thinker was Razorfist, every part of the dude's style copied down to the type font used for the intro. Didnt copy Razor's ideas though, as he used Razor's style to exemplify Xbox dudebros.
He was, but I don't think he started that way.

There was one episode where the anti-thinker wore the sunglasses and had a show just like Razorfist's. But I think if the anti-thinker was intended to be a Razorfist parody from the start he would have had a leather jacket and sunglasses from his introduction.

Agreed, and I totally stole the idea from Detroit: Become Human which stole from Blade Runner and other Android sci-fi movies, also would Bob be a fan of David Cage? They have very similar ideas for “movies”
But David Cage doesn't make 8bit retro platform games, so Bob doesn't care.

I disagree. Quite a few of his ideas are very interesting in a "The Room meets a North Korean propaganda film plus a billion pop culture references" absolute cringe-laden train wreck kinda way.
Bob's ideas all seem like they come from a film student who thinks he's being clever, but hasn't thought about the idea beyond the elevator pitch and as a result it sounds dumb. Anyone can do it.
"It's like G.I. Joe meets Driving Ms. Daisy. Hugh Jackman can play the role of Shipwreck. $150 million opening week end. Call me."
 
Bob's ideas all seem like they come from a film student who thinks he's being clever, but hasn't thought about the idea beyond the elevator pitch and as a result it sounds dumb. Anyone can do it.
"It's like G.I. Joe meets Driving Ms. Daisy. Hugh Jackman can play the role of Shipwreck. $150 million opening week end. Call me."
I'm trying to imagine a studio executive unfortunate enough to be trapped in an elevator with Bob. The poor bastard will be begging for the sweet release of death in less than a minute.
 
Bob decided to something relatively smart and kind for once and give us a TL;DW of his Joker review.
1571054805722.png

He hates joker not for a reason like "It has bad cinematography" or anything like that. He seemingly hates it because it reminds him of why so many people dislike him and his mindset/ attitude towards them.

Also Bob showcases his hypocrisy once again:
1571055240862.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00gSMlkgpG8
Time Stamp: 3:10
 
The kingsman shit leads to some MANSPLANING
bob mansplaning.png

His timeline says otherwise ps fuck bernie
bob lie.png

Bob scrapes wikipedia to write some shit
bob class 2.png

That last reply leads to some sperging
bob class treason.png

Don't worry though bob totally didnt say what you just read!
bob racists.png

He was also corrected by a historian. Don't worry though bob just made a mistake because his "notes" werent handy.
bob class 3.png
 
The kingsman shit leads to some MANSPLANING
View attachment 970784

His timeline says otherwise ps fuck bernie
View attachment 970785

Bob scrapes wikipedia to write some shit
View attachment 970786

That last reply leads to some sperging
View attachment 970787

Don't worry though bob totally didnt say what you just read!
View attachment 970788

He was also corrected by a historian. Don't worry though bob just made a mistake because his "notes" werent handy.
View attachment 970789
His reply to this man versus his reply to some rando on twitter is telling
 
The kingsman shit leads to some MANSPLANING
View attachment 970784

His timeline says otherwise ps fuck bernie
View attachment 970785

Bob scrapes wikipedia to write some shit
View attachment 970786

That last reply leads to some sperging
View attachment 970787

Don't worry though bob totally didnt say what you just read!
View attachment 970788

He was also corrected by a historian. Don't worry though bob just made a mistake because his "notes" werent handy.
View attachment 970789

Amazing how "the comedian" and "professional internet clown" is far more known for his rage and sneering condescension than he is for being, you know, funny.
 
Amazing how "the comedian" and "professional internet clown" is far more known for his rage and sneering condescension than he is for being, you know, funny.
I would say Bob is funny, but not for any intentional reason. Personally, I find the idea that Bob, an obese pseudo intellectual, who has a bad academic background and contributes nothing of value to society, spouts the kind of rhetoric he does with pretty much 0 self-awareness to be pretty funny.
 
I would say Bob is funny, but not for any intentional reason. Personally, I find the idea that Bob, an obese pseudo intellectual, who has a bad academic background and contributes nothing of value to society, spouts the kind of rhetoric he does with pretty much 0 self-awareness to be pretty funny.
I find it very funny that he gets into twitter fights with people who are far smarter than him and more knowledgeable on politics and leftist policy.

Also movie reviewers who are just funnier and more entertaining than Blob. He’s just so clueless what a joke he is.
 
Replace Thomas with Murray Franklin and you hit it square on the money.
Interesting that you say that because I think that Murray Franklin is Bob's sort of ideal self as an entertainer: a rather universally beloved, witty and topical talk show host that comes from grassroots and operates out of his own home town. Where bob and Murray disconnect, I believe, is that Murray is sort of the audiences pulse on the "common person" of Gotham and the feeling of just wanting to live out a peaceful life. He opposed the riots and the Joker's killings not because he had some overwhelming anti-poor sentiment but because any same person wouldn't want these things to happen.

Thomas Wayne however, looks down on those he does not seem productive members of society, however cannot elaborate a way to reassure those down on their and blames them. Like a certain basement(-"apartment") dwelling movie critic.
Bob decided to something relatively smart and kind for once and give us a TL;DW of his Joker review.
View attachment 970663
He hates joker not for a reason like "It has bad cinematography" or anything like that. He seemingly hates it because it reminds him of why so many people dislike him and his mindset/ attitude towards them.

Also Bob showcases his hypocrisy once again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00gSMlkgpG8
Time Stamp: 3:10
Am I the only person who doesn't feel that the movie was never trying to justify Arthur? I never felt that Joker ever tries to glorify his "winning" moments and works to paint a bigger picture that when a place like Gotham is so dysfunctional that people like Arthur can become Joker and the Joker "wins" the people lose
 
I find it very funny that he gets into twitter fights with people who are far smarter than him and more knowledgeable on politics and leftist policy.

Also movie reviewers who are just funnier and more entertaining than Blob. He’s just so clueless what a joke he is.
Its one of those innately hilarious contradictions

The soul and morality of joseph stalin fused with the charm and likeability of the original night stalker, the intelligence and maturity of chris chan, and the body weight and cholesterol of fatty arbuckle.
 
Interesting that you say that because I think that Murray Franklin is Bob's sort of ideal self as an entertainer: a rather universally beloved, witty and topical talk show host that comes from grassroots and operates out of his own home town. Where bob and Murray disconnect, I believe, is that Murray is sort of the audiences pulse on the "common person" of Gotham and the feeling of just wanting to live out a peaceful life. He opposed the riots and the Joker's killings not because he had some overwhelming anti-poor sentiment but because any same person wouldn't want these things to happen.

Thomas Wayne however, looks down on those he does not seem productive members of society, however cannot elaborate a way to reassure those down on their and blames them. Like a certain basement(-"apartment") dwelling movie critic.

I more point out that Bob generally tends to have contempt for his "peers" that might not agree with him on certain films, dismissing it in a rather smug demeanor. Granted going down the rabbit hole of likening Bob to any successful figure is a bit of a stretch.

Am I the only person who doesn't feel that the movie was never trying to justify Arthur? I never felt that Joker ever tries to glorify his "winning" moments and works to paint a bigger picture that when a place like Gotham is so dysfunctional that people like Arthur can become Joker and the Joker "wins" the people lose

Justify? No. I do however feel like a main theme of the film is that Arthur is just as much of a victim of the world as the people that he terrorizes? He's never glorified, rather held up as the consequences that come from a largely apathetic society (granted he kills the executives before he loses access to his meds, though I think that empathy is the thing that he was truly lacking, but that's just my interpretation.) It's also funny that this film that never actually had anything interesting to say according to Bob could lead to this sort of discussion.
 
...Actually I'm with Bob on the "mansplaining" thing. In a rare moment where I'll agree with the fucker on something. The Westboro Baptist Church are a group this planet would genuinely be better off without...so if a movie is killing them or very obvious stand-ins for them...yeah I've gotta side with him on that one, they're as much acceptable targets as Terrorists or Nazis for violence. He even correctly pointed out that it's fucking fiction so it doesn't ultimately matter anyway? I had no complaints about that particular scene in Kingsmen and still don't. Hell, it doesn't even really qualify as "senseless violence" because if those morons had actually paid attention, the movie completely condemns the actions the moment the character returns to his senses. Basically saying "Yeah Westboro are repugnant fucks but it isn't right to murder them wholesale" So yeah, I'm gonna (begrudgingly because he's still a filthy eugenicist) agree with Bob on Kingsmen; those people need to lighten the fuck up. Like, really if anything I'd say he didn't go far enough, since again, those people are completely missing the fucking point of that scene anyway (that senseless violence is abhorrent, even if the target is an acceptable one).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back