You can't deny that the DNC did massively fuck him over and that he would have had a better chance if that didn't happen, though.
For me, reading his tweets is like reading the CWCki - it's horrible, but you can't turn your eyes away.
It would be a shame if another media personality had stood for President, been elected and if Blob had spent the last four years calling that personality a failed TV show host, etc.
Anti-Semitism, and more generally speaking anything that involves Judaism, is only bad when the right do it. For instance, it's perfectly fine for the left to criticise Israel or oppose globalism, but if the right do it it they must be motivated by hatred of God's Chosen™.
I think it was
@John Andrews Stan who said that the left use Jews as pawns and cast them aside when they're not useful. I couldn't agree more; Blobby is willing to throw around accusations of anti-Semitism at people who he disagrees with, but turns around and basically says ”so what about those (((conservatives))), huh?”.
I don't see what's so bad about an agrarian economy. Bob has said that we're in a climate crisis and that this will affect a lot of our life; he's also willing to support the Green New Deal, which would lead to
massive state intervention in order to fight this crisis. Given all this, it follows that he admits that climate change would disrupt a lot of our lifestyle and that we have to adapt to it.
Why, then, does he oppose making ordinary Americans resilient to climate change by giving them land? A subsistence farmer will be far less negatively affected by a lack of consoomer goods from China than a ”highly-evolved 21st Century American” in a big city, and that subsistence farmer will produce a lot less CO2.
The idea that all Republicans took part in the shitshow that happened on the 6th of January can be proven wrong by the fact that the small amount of people there who would have lynched Nancy Pelosi would also have gladly lynched Mitch McConnell.