blablabla
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
its the eyes man, those empty mongolid eyes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's always had kind of a miserable look in his photos. At least over the last several years. It's getting worse because he's aging so badly lately. His years of poor self-care are catching up to him bit by bit.Have you noticed that Bob looks sad in his most recent pictures? It's like he's slowly realizing that his life has been wasted. He's 40/41 now, and he has nothing to show for it except a dead YouTube channel, a Twitter checkmark, a rotting leg, and one of the largest threads on the Kiwi Farms. It's almost sad to watch- until you read the bile he spews online, whereupon any sympathy vanishes like chicken strips down Bob's gaping maw.
Bob is an unlikable asshole online because he's realizing that his life is completely wasted. He made his bed, and now he's beginning to lay in it.
Elaborate please, Positron-sama.Ah the great Nature vs Nurture debate. In Bobby's case I stand firmly on the Nurture side: in other words, I think Bobby's parents fucked up.
I do think he does have a mild case of ID still based on how poor he is at conveying ideas in his writing, absorbing details and altering behavior in light of it, and for being dumb enough to lie big like it won't be obvious as hell. That he's also very salty over IQ and also desperately tries to deny that academic interest is a sign of a true nerd hammers that home for me.I was thinking along the line of his anger problem, which distinguishes Bobby from the garden-variety nerd, even from Little Bro. We know Bobby thinks he is "smart" in having outwitted his therapist, but a vigilant parent should have noticed that therapy wasn't working and then enquired why. But I grant that we know too little about his folks to draw a concrete conclusion; I was just speaking out my impression.
Yeah, that is an argument I've heard when it comes to sex and it's one I do agree with. It's just not something that people tend to use as their first port of call in an abortion debate - the majority of pro-lifers are pro-life because they think preserving the baby's life is more important than anything else.@Marshal Mannerheim regarding your point on pro-life arguments (because quoting's still broken). I've heard Film Rob's point before, but not in the way he's set up his strawman. It's always in the context of "actions have consequences." I'm assuming he's heard someone say that while bringing up the point of pre-marital abstinence and he's translating it into his smooth, curtain analyzing, Crayola craving brain so he can "own the cons." It's not so much a pro-life argument as it is a anti-sex argument. Of course, even if he framed it right he'd still be big mad because people like him can't see why a loving God would deny the gratification sex brings, even though if you think about it seriously you'd be able to come up with some very good reasons. Especially if you committed that particular sin and experienced some of those consequences.
To be fair, the Left has been spewing Bobby's acquired strawman arguments for over 60 years. The feminisms have convinced Bobby that to get laid, he needs to unquestioningly believe (lol) that Feti Don't Matter and Aren't Hooman (despite this being the opposite of science, lol), and that even if they were, a woman has the right to do whatever with her own body without interference because yada yada women aren't chattel. Never mind that most conservative Christians don't even believe that women are chattel, except for a few nutty outliers. Or that women being chattel isn't a Christian concept - it was around long before then and was never adopted by the Church, and the correct concept is that husband and wife belong to each other. Now, there is a concept of authority, and husbands being higher on the hierarchy than the wife, but this isn't the same as women being chattel.The issue is people like Bob like to conflate arguments or even make up arguments the opposition has. As I pointed out, it's an abstinence argument but to that side, abstinence is just as evil as being pro-life so to Bob it's the same thing because it all involves sex. Never argue with an idiot something something beat you with experience.
I often wonder at the motivation of those that simp abortion so hard. It's one thing to consider it in the name of saving the mother or similar reasons, but why do so many take it to the point of reveling in the act- I wonder how if they're so unhappy with their own lives and so misanthropic that they are projecting their own wish to have never been born?
Were I a morbidly obese manchild with nothing to look forward to but endless MCU consumption I might understand that drive.
While I do understand what you’re saying. I have to disagree.I don't see a relatively obscure character like Black Canary played by a no-name (and don't get me wrong, she was one of the better parts of the shitty Birds of Prey In Name Only) fronting a team that should include pop culture icons like Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. Can't even get one ofthem in a movie? What's Gal Gadot doing that's so damned important?
It is very easy to confuse between between the two senses of "consequences": the descriptive and the normative. To say that "sex has consequences" can evoke either sense: the natural, descriptive, sense (namely sex allows the mixing of gametes and hence pregnacy) or the moral sense (you have the obligation to realize the natural consequence of sex and deal with it). As I see it, most people (regardless of their religious affiliation) means the moral sense, taking the biological sense for granted.Koby Fish said:It doesn't help that there are some narcissists out there who happen to be Christian who will say things like "Pregnancy is a consequence of sex" in a way that comes out "People need to have/face consequences from sex" but mostly it's just a huge strawman because reality itself, not some "god-botherer" (in Bob's terminology), determines consequences of one's actions. And we all know the Left is allergic to Consequences of one's actions.
An advice to those who are in danger of Bobby's linguistic pull: give simple constructions a ride; you'll be astounded by how powerful they are.After almost a month without looking at Positron's exceptional work I got a compliment from my manager saying that my communication had improved signifficantly. To my horror I had been using Bob's structure sentences for months without even realizing it.
Bobby knows gun-fu. He can fight like Neo in Matrix.Bolo said:but a 40 year old doof who acts internet tough and also flexes having a gun is also sad and pathetic, talking on twitter about hypothetical gun fights you gonna have is peacl alpha male Robert.
It can work- but keep in mind the animated films have a much more niche audience, lower budget and risk level, and are generally expected to perform more modestly than a tentpole blockbuster type of movie. Yeah, the comics/DCAU fans that check out the animated movies will likely know all those less-mainstream characters. But as DC goes the niche characters aren't selling movie tickets. Birds of Prey and Suicide Squad 2 were both, if not flops, pretty damned close. Shazam wasn't a particularly notable hit (though it is a good movie).While I do understand what you’re saying. I have to disagree.
Movies about an alternate Justice League can work if the story and characters are written by a competent writer.
If fact, I can name a movie that actually did this, Justice League: Gods and Monsters.
It was a great "What if" scenario where we got recontextualized versions of Superman (who in this version is the Son of Zod), Batman (who here is a mutated Kirk Langstrom), and Wonder Woman (who has ties to Darkseid and Apokolips). It takes our preestablished knowledge of the characters, twists them, and creates a whole new fresh and interesting story, and it’s all done in Bruce Timm's trademark art style.
The point is, I think an alternate Justice League movie can work. You just need to be creative with your writing.
What do you guys think? I’d like to hear your suggestions.