Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Have you noticed that Bob looks sad in his most recent pictures? It's like he's slowly realizing that his life has been wasted. He's 40/41 now, and he has nothing to show for it except a dead YouTube channel, a Twitter checkmark, a rotting leg, and one of the largest threads on the Kiwi Farms. It's almost sad to watch- until you read the bile he spews online, whereupon any sympathy vanishes like chicken strips down Bob's gaping maw.

Bob is an unlikable asshole online because he's realizing that his life is completely wasted. He made his bed, and now he's beginning to lay in it.
He's always had kind of a miserable look in his photos. At least over the last several years. It's getting worse because he's aging so badly lately. His years of poor self-care are catching up to him bit by bit.
 
abort.png
Untitled.png
For all the left moan about "theocratic dictatorship" and how Dominionists Catholics Russian Orthodox converts whoever the boogeyman du jour is want to force women back to the kitchen, they seem happy to set up a theocracy so long as it worships "progress" and its high priests are Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg.
E-ZjO79UUAEFrb_.jpg
99% of pro-life arguments start with the premise that life begins at conception and that that life matters just as much as its mother's does. I have never met someone who argues for life on the basis that "women should face consequences". It's pretty telling that pro-abortionists have to use strawmen to "prove" their point.
cvd.png
Bob, just because you get off to the idea of being one of the Commanders off The Handmaid's Tale and having a wife who looks suspiciously like AOC doesn't mean that everyone dreams of doing that.
 
Ah the great Nature vs Nurture debate. In Bobby's case I stand firmly on the Nurture side: in other words, I think Bobby's parents fucked up.
Elaborate please, Positron-sama.

I was always under the impression that it's chiefly nature that has bestowed upon us the pleasure of Robert Chipman, but you might be more correct in your assessment of what made our beloved incel. My main reasons for pointing out nature as the main culprit is simply because of Roberts appearance, with his empty rooster-eyes, complete failure to grasp the normally instinctually employed necessary mechanisms in the making of a smile, and overall body shape, combined with his rancid personality and actual — possibly clinical — delusions. I believe that @Adamska is completely correct in emphazising these delusions when tearing Robert a new one. Our favorite Chipman has been saying shit throughout the years that are so ludicrous, so absolutely batshit insane, that I just can't think of anything other than it all stemming from a failure of biological hardware. I mean, the connection between Ubisoft and 9/11? With drug abuse on the streets and FPS-gamers? Combined with the rest of the shit he says on a literal daily basis? Robert is mentally ill, and not of the more modest "I have depression"-variety.

Seeing as everyone thought that Chris Chipman was a solid specimen of a man, until he happily showed the world otherwise, I can imagine that you're correct though, but it could also mean that he's merely displaying his share in the genetic makeup that spawned his older brother. Their sister made a brief stunt, allying herself to her brothers online, when the Chipmans bros were distraught over someone mocking Robert's book by doing some sort of read along on YouTube (?), and based on the photos of her chugging alcohol with her brother, and otherwise apparent willingness to happily spend time with them, I'd hazard a guess in saying that she is about as bad as her brothers. I mean, family love and spending time with your family is important, but if I had a brother like Robert, I'd seriously consider disowning him, or at least make sure I'm not beeing seen with him publicly.

It's probably both nature and nurture though, as it usually is.
 
I was thinking along the line of his anger problem, which distinguishes Bobby from the garden-variety nerd, even from Little Bro. We know Bobby thinks he is "smart" in having outwitted his therapist, but a vigilant parent should have noticed that therapy wasn't working and then enquired why. But I grant that we know too little about his folks to draw a concrete conclusion; I was just speaking out my impression.
 
I was thinking along the line of his anger problem, which distinguishes Bobby from the garden-variety nerd, even from Little Bro. We know Bobby thinks he is "smart" in having outwitted his therapist, but a vigilant parent should have noticed that therapy wasn't working and then enquired why. But I grant that we know too little about his folks to draw a concrete conclusion; I was just speaking out my impression.
I do think he does have a mild case of ID still based on how poor he is at conveying ideas in his writing, absorbing details and altering behavior in light of it, and for being dumb enough to lie big like it won't be obvious as hell. That he's also very salty over IQ and also desperately tries to deny that academic interest is a sign of a true nerd hammers that home for me.

2/3 cases of ID have unknown causes, hence why I wrote that. But as for the full monty, you have to factor in how shitty his parents were at enabling his delusions of intelligence. Mama Chipman had to bribe him with a SNES to get him to even bother trying at school is just one demonstrable example. But it's obvious he was coddled many a time because Bob learned early that throwing fits and digging his heels gets him what he wants.

So that's why I do genuinely think he's both; he's slow in the mind, but his family enabled and encouraged his delusions and cluster B personality.
 
@Marshal Mannerheim regarding your point on pro-life arguments (because quoting's still broken). I've heard Film Rob's point before, but not in the way he's set up his strawman. It's always in the context of "actions have consequences." I'm assuming he's heard someone say that while bringing up the point of pre-marital abstinence and he's translating it into his smooth, curtain analyzing, Crayola craving brain so he can "own the cons." It's not so much a pro-life argument as it is a anti-sex argument. Of course, even if he framed it right he'd still be big mad because people like him can't see why a loving God would deny the gratification sex brings, even though if you think about it seriously you'd be able to come up with some very good reasons. Especially if you committed that particular sin and experienced some of those consequences.
 
@Marshal Mannerheim regarding your point on pro-life arguments (because quoting's still broken). I've heard Film Rob's point before, but not in the way he's set up his strawman. It's always in the context of "actions have consequences." I'm assuming he's heard someone say that while bringing up the point of pre-marital abstinence and he's translating it into his smooth, curtain analyzing, Crayola craving brain so he can "own the cons." It's not so much a pro-life argument as it is a anti-sex argument. Of course, even if he framed it right he'd still be big mad because people like him can't see why a loving God would deny the gratification sex brings, even though if you think about it seriously you'd be able to come up with some very good reasons. Especially if you committed that particular sin and experienced some of those consequences.
Yeah, that is an argument I've heard when it comes to sex and it's one I do agree with. It's just not something that people tend to use as their first port of call in an abortion debate - the majority of pro-lifers are pro-life because they think preserving the baby's life is more important than anything else.
 
The issue is people like Bob like to conflate arguments or even make up arguments the opposition has. As I pointed out, it's an abstinence argument but to that side, abstinence is just as evil as being pro-life so to Bob it's the same thing because it all involves sex. Never argue with an idiot something something beat you with experience.
 
@Marshal Mannerheim
Yeah the whole business that the feminisms like to push as a strawman regarding well, women in general (not just abortion) for decades got ingrained really hard into smoothbrains like Film Bob. Bob and his ilk are so brainwashed, that they take it as gospel truth without question. It doesn't help that there are some narcissists out there who happen to be Christian who will say things like "Pregnancy is a consequence of sex" in a way that comes out "People need to have/face consequences from sex" but mostly it's just a huge strawman because reality itself, not some "god-botherer" (in Bob's terminology), determines consequences of one's actions. And we all know the Left is allergic to Consequences of one's actions.

Also yeah, gonna call bullshit on Bob's claim to read the minds of the "right-wing" (LOL) women to determine they want to be "owned" by a Real Chad. I dunno which teacher taught him that or which stupid leftist book he read (I will guarantee you he never read Handmaid's Tale, maybe saw some of the series on Hulu though - but this predates that) where he got that stupid idea, but nobody ever disabused him of the notion until it was too late and he's stuck thinking that way forever. Geez, no wonder he's still single.
The issue is people like Bob like to conflate arguments or even make up arguments the opposition has. As I pointed out, it's an abstinence argument but to that side, abstinence is just as evil as being pro-life so to Bob it's the same thing because it all involves sex. Never argue with an idiot something something beat you with experience.
To be fair, the Left has been spewing Bobby's acquired strawman arguments for over 60 years. The feminisms have convinced Bobby that to get laid, he needs to unquestioningly believe (lol) that Feti Don't Matter and Aren't Hooman (despite this being the opposite of science, lol), and that even if they were, a woman has the right to do whatever with her own body without interference because yada yada women aren't chattel. Never mind that most conservative Christians don't even believe that women are chattel, except for a few nutty outliers. Or that women being chattel isn't a Christian concept - it was around long before then and was never adopted by the Church, and the correct concept is that husband and wife belong to each other. Now, there is a concept of authority, and husbands being higher on the hierarchy than the wife, but this isn't the same as women being chattel.

But more than that, the Left's strawmanisms surrounding feminism are pure projection. They project onto the pro-life (religious or not) the very things they themselves want to do. They want to control women; but in the opposite direction (this explains why many Male Feminists(tm) are narcissistic, controlling sex pests). They say they're pro-"choice" but then they act like Abortion is the ONLY valid choice if a woman is wavering on whether to keep her baby or not. This is so pervasive that Justin Trudeau is trying to wrench charitable status from Crisis Pregnancy charities in Canada, to prevent them from preventing abortions. They see fetuses as nothing more than means to control women, because they see children as a burden, not a joy. It's an entire pathology when it's not simply "I support a woman's right to get an abortion", it's swung towards "I will manipulate the situation so that every pregnant woman possible GETS an abortion."

But then, it's just possible that Bob's crush on Lindsay The Hotdog Abortion Ellis fuels his pro-choice mania (though this wouldn't explain his brother) and he knows that nothing less than simping for full aborshuns would garner her sympathy or notice.
 
Last edited:
I often wonder at the motivation of those that simp abortion so hard. It's one thing to consider it in the name of saving the mother or similar reasons, but why do so many take it to the point of reveling in the act- I wonder how if they're so unhappy with their own lives and so misanthropic that they are projecting their own wish to have never been born?

Were I a morbidly obese manchild with nothing to look forward to but endless MCU consumption I might understand that drive.
 
I often wonder at the motivation of those that simp abortion so hard. It's one thing to consider it in the name of saving the mother or similar reasons, but why do so many take it to the point of reveling in the act- I wonder how if they're so unhappy with their own lives and so misanthropic that they are projecting their own wish to have never been born?

Were I a morbidly obese manchild with nothing to look forward to but endless MCU consumption I might understand that drive.

Men like Bob simp for abortion because they think it will help them get into some feminist's pants. 100 years ago, before the rise of femimisn, men like Bob would have been telling women that their duty is to remain at home, find men like themselves, and bear as many children as possible. Bob's politics are nothing but a cynical ploy for pussy.
 
Hello Kiwis, this is a public service announcement for other ESL-kuns like myself: please consume moviebob tweets in extreme moderation. After almost a month without looking at Positron's exceptional work I got a compliment from my manager saying that my communication had improved signifficantly. To my horror I had been using Bob's structure sentences for months without even realizing it.

First you follow Bob for the sheer stupidity of his ideas but slowly the fallout of his smoothbrain takes starts to rot and fester inside your head. Before you know it you are vomiting run-on sentences with contradicting statements and calling your clients mayo ghouls.
 
I don't see a relatively obscure character like Black Canary played by a no-name (and don't get me wrong, she was one of the better parts of the shitty Birds of Prey In Name Only) fronting a team that should include pop culture icons like Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. Can't even get one ofthem in a movie? What's Gal Gadot doing that's so damned important?
While I do understand what you’re saying. I have to disagree.

Movies about an alternate Justice League can work if the story and characters are written by a competent writer.

If fact, I can name a movie that actually did this, Justice League: Gods and Monsters.

It was a great "What if" scenario where we got recontextualized versions of Superman (who in this version is the Son of Zod), Batman (who here is a mutated Kirk Langstrom), and Wonder Woman (who has ties to Darkseid and Apokolips). It takes our preestablished knowledge of the characters, twists them, and creates a whole new fresh and interesting story, and it’s all done in Bruce Timm's trademark art style.

The point is, I think an alternate Justice League movie can work. You just need to be creative with your writing.

What do you guys think? I’d like to hear your suggestions.
 
Koby Fish said:
It doesn't help that there are some narcissists out there who happen to be Christian who will say things like "Pregnancy is a consequence of sex" in a way that comes out "People need to have/face consequences from sex" but mostly it's just a huge strawman because reality itself, not some "god-botherer" (in Bob's terminology), determines consequences of one's actions. And we all know the Left is allergic to Consequences of one's actions.
It is very easy to confuse between between the two senses of "consequences": the descriptive and the normative. To say that "sex has consequences" can evoke either sense: the natural, descriptive, sense (namely sex allows the mixing of gametes and hence pregnacy) or the moral sense (you have the obligation to realize the natural consequence of sex and deal with it). As I see it, most people (regardless of their religious affiliation) means the moral sense, taking the biological sense for granted.

When Bobby uses the word "consequences" he is invariably evoking the moral sense and twisting it to serve his retarded agenda.

After almost a month without looking at Positron's exceptional work I got a compliment from my manager saying that my communication had improved signifficantly. To my horror I had been using Bob's structure sentences for months without even realizing it.
An advice to those who are in danger of Bobby's linguistic pull: give simple constructions a ride; you'll be astounded by how powerful they are.
 
Can't sleep, I'm bored so i'm gonna sperg.

bobstupid.jpg


geez Robert, if you gonna suck that much cock, at least make sure you are getting paid dude.

But I'm also glad that the Shang-Chi flick is doing good. really, I do.

Not to be cute at all, I do genuinely hope that movie/stream capeshit still continues to make bank, and characters like Kate Bishop and kamala kahn become mega hits, so at last Disney will kick marvel comics to the curb since they don't need them anymore to "IP farm" and that will force the american comics business to move away from the spandex shit and maybe invest in new genres, distributions methods and so on.

Well, maybe, who knows, better than things are right now.

bobstupid2.jpg


Goddamn those religious-fascists are good. Even if they are just a percentage of the population, they are still able to hold the entire course of humanity's progress, and there is nothing the evolved can do about it. Color me impressed, that is some efficiency right there.

bobstupid3.jpg


Yeah, the dweb redneck posing with his guns on his white-trash backyard is pretty lame, but a 40 year old doof who acts internet tough and also flexes having a gun is also sad and pathetic, talking on twitter about hypothetical gun fights you gonna have is peacl alpha male Robert.

bobstupid4.jpg


literacy in politics is talked in the context of a person being able to understand who they are voting for or what they are signing into, not just putting a "X" on the side the box their bosses told them to, so literacy is one way people have to be freed from the this political practice, that used to be very popular in the 1920, in south and central america.

Also, the US has some of the highest literacy rating in the world, and at least 99% of its population can at least read and write in a basic level, so where the fuck did you find these heroes that can't read Robert? the ones who taught you to "survive" this harsh world of doing youtube videos and living in the dangers of a middle class first world life?

Fuck me this guy is such a drama queen. Fight and survive my ass, this candy ass that came from the same household that gave us Chris Chapman, who is breaking down in public asking for money, tard raging and breaking his hand on walls, and pretty much not being able to handle adult life and making sure everybody can see it, yeah, those are fighters alright.
 

Attachments

  • bobstupid3.jpg
    bobstupid3.jpg
    138.7 KB · Views: 47
Nice to know that we Christians have buffered 99.9% of scientific and social progress. God only knows how much alienation and anomie would result if Superior Future had gone full throttle.

Bolo said:
but a 40 year old doof who acts internet tough and also flexes having a gun is also sad and pathetic, talking on twitter about hypothetical gun fights you gonna have is peacl alpha male Robert.
Bobby knows gun-fu. He can fight like Neo in Matrix.

Still I agree with Bobby in some sense re: literacy -- making big words appear in your tweets only means you've been exposed to big words, not that you understand them.
 
While I do understand what you’re saying. I have to disagree.

Movies about an alternate Justice League can work if the story and characters are written by a competent writer.

If fact, I can name a movie that actually did this, Justice League: Gods and Monsters.

It was a great "What if" scenario where we got recontextualized versions of Superman (who in this version is the Son of Zod), Batman (who here is a mutated Kirk Langstrom), and Wonder Woman (who has ties to Darkseid and Apokolips). It takes our preestablished knowledge of the characters, twists them, and creates a whole new fresh and interesting story, and it’s all done in Bruce Timm's trademark art style.

The point is, I think an alternate Justice League movie can work. You just need to be creative with your writing.

What do you guys think? I’d like to hear your suggestions.
It can work- but keep in mind the animated films have a much more niche audience, lower budget and risk level, and are generally expected to perform more modestly than a tentpole blockbuster type of movie. Yeah, the comics/DCAU fans that check out the animated movies will likely know all those less-mainstream characters. But as DC goes the niche characters aren't selling movie tickets. Birds of Prey and Suicide Squad 2 were both, if not flops, pretty damned close. Shazam wasn't a particularly notable hit (though it is a good movie).

Black Canary's a great character. One of my favorites in the comics for being the wiser better half to Green Arrow, but I don't think you can sell the public a movie on Black Canary when the last movie to feature her was a flaming fudgebag.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back