Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if Bob realizes you can subjectively like an objectively bad film. Like...you know The Room. Despite your feelings on Mauler and his autistic style of critique, it's always funny watching Blobbo slapfight with people.
The Room is one of those "so bad it's good" hilarious trainwreck of a movie. Like, it's bad, everybody knows it's badly written and badly acted, but it turned into a meme (Ohai, Mark).

I'm sure Bob realizes that someone can like a film that he considers either meh or not great, but his double standards have made him go hard on movies that he doesn't like for ideological reasons moreso than quality reasons.
 
I wonder if Bob realizes you can subjectively like an objectively bad film. Like...you know The Room. Despite your feelings on Mauler and his autistic style of critique, it's always funny watching Blobbo slapfight with people.
Difference is that MauLer may be a massive sperg, but he definitely ISN'T PelikulaRoberto.
 
Seeing MauLer’s fanbase going at it with Bob is very amusing to me. I don’t like either of them, but I’m merely annoyed by MauLer: he’s a fart-huffing, egotistical pedant who mistakes long critique for substantive critique, and his “objective” standards are incredibly autistic and not consistently applied. However, I outright despise Bob, and it makes me root for MauLer and his disciples in this particular tard-fight.
 
Seeing MauLer’s fanbase going at it with Bob is very amusing to me. I don’t like either of them, but I’m merely annoyed by MauLer: he’s a fart-huffing, egotistical pedant who mistakes long critique for substantive critique, and his “objective” standards are incredibly autistic and not consistently applied. However, I outright despise Bob, and it makes me root for MauLer and his disciples in this particular tard-fight.

MauLer is to Critical Drinker as Doomcock is to Nerdrotic: the retarded-ass sidekick someone in marketing dreamed up who you just have to suffer through if you still want to enjoy whatever quality there is to be found.

All four of them are more tolerable than MovieBob (though with Doomcock it's a near thing). And not only is Critical Drinker by far the best critic among the five of them, he blows Bob out of the water without even really putting any effort into it.
 
Seeing MauLer’s fanbase going at it with Bob is very amusing to me. I don’t like either of them, but I’m merely annoyed by MauLer: he’s a fart-huffing, egotistical pedant who mistakes long critique for substantive critique, and his “objective” standards are incredibly autistic and not consistently applied. However, I outright despise Bob, and it makes me root for MauLer and his disciples in this particular tard-fight.

The whole scene around Mauler I find annoying, and I find myself out of any crumble of fucks to give to whatever side of a discussion about pop culture shit, not that I'm cynical or "above it", it is just old news by now, shit just keeps repeating themselves.

Not to mention that there is a bit of a cynical side to the sort of content Mauler, or Critical Drinker, Or Nerdrotic or any of these guys do, and that is the "preach to the choir" aspect, whatever these guys have to say on whatever show/movie/whatever is going to be what their audience wants to hear, and that is fine, it is what this sort of content is predicated into, it just, you know, makes it boring.

What is funny is that Robert could have "won" this slap fight if he had even a little bit of tact. Instead of just being condescending and then angry when people pushed back, all he had to point out that pedantic nitpicking doesn't help to factor if a film has quality or not, nor the idea to "quantify" flaws.

And I say that because that is what got Cinema Sins, which does a similiar stchik to Mauler's. I know it is hard to believe, but there was a point in time when people thought Cinema Sins had a point to make about movies, but eventually there was a big backlash against the stupid sin format shit and the cinema sins guys had to pivot to "hey it is just a joke guys, relax".

Not that Cinema Sins were ever in danger to change how people saw movies, or the discussion about it, but for a period of time quite a few people tought they were legit. Not anymore.

I think that may happen to Mauler, maybe not now nor anytime soon, but it will happen, and when it does, he will just say "come on guys, we are just having fun here".

Point is, you can'r refute retarded spergery with retarded spergery, otherwise the guy with more retards on his side will win, which is Mauler.

But Robert can't help himself because he is still butthurt over the diabeto jokes, and so he sneeds and feeds.
 
The whole scene around Mauler I find annoying, and I find myself out of any crumble of fucks to give to whatever side of a discussion about pop culture shit, not that I'm cynical or "above it", it is just old news by now, shit just keeps repeating themselves.

Not to mention that there is a bit of a cynical side to the sort of content Mauler, or Critical Drinker, Or Nerdrotic or any of these guys do, and that is the "preach to the choir" aspect, whatever these guys have to say on whatever show/movie/whatever is going to be what their audience wants to hear, and that is fine, it is what this sort of content is predicated into, it just, you know, makes it boring.

What is funny is that Robert could have "won" this slap fight if he had even a little bit of tact. Instead of just being condescending and then angry when people pushed back, all he had to point out that pedantic nitpicking doesn't help to factor if a film has quality or not, nor the idea to "quantify" flaws.

And I say that because that is what got Cinema Sins, which does a similiar stchik to Mauler's. I know it is hard to believe, but there was a point in time when people thought Cinema Sins had a point to make about movies, but eventually there was a big backlash against the stupid sin format shit and the cinema sins guys had to pivot to "hey it is just a joke guys, relax".

Not that Cinema Sins were ever in danger to change how people saw movies, or the discussion about it, but for a period of time quite a few people tought they were legit. Not anymore.

I think that may happen to Mauler, maybe not now nor anytime soon, but it will happen, and when it does, he will just say "come on guys, we are just having fun here".

Point is, you can'r refute retarded spergery with retarded spergery, otherwise the guy with more retards on his side will win, which is Mauler.

But Robert can't help himself because he is still butthurt over the diabeto jokes, and so he sneeds and feeds.
This does make me wonder, would drinker, Mauler or any of these clowns be as big as they are if the whole retarded "muh kultur wuurr" circus didnt happen. Because lets be real all these guys (Drinker, Mauler, Rags an etc) only got this big thanks to this retarded shit that people rave about. I just cannot see them making half the numbers or views if this topic wasnt the hottest thing still rolling on.
 
This is one of Bob's orbiters right?
1662016194270.png1662016215969.png1662016223047.png1662016230075.png

1662016241071.png
 
Bob is a fart huffing, terminally online sperg with heaps of free time on his hands, he should be the perfect audience for a Mauler video. Yet Mauler has "wrong opinions" on movies (despite objectivity not being a real you guys) so Bob can't stand him.

I quite like Mauler and the gang but not nearly enough to stomach their half day-long circlejerks. But it's the fanbase I take real issue with. They applaud and get excited when he releases these absurdly long videos as if it is some badge of honour that they have the spare time to watch a 6 hour review of a film people stopped talking about months ago. They're consoomers of a different stripe that parrot Mauler's opinions instead of forming their own. And really, if you need 7+ hours to explain why The Last Jedi is a steaming heap of shit your writing is probably on par with that movie.

Yet despite their flaws I don't have a problem with it and it's fine those videos exist. I'd much rather sit through every EFAP circlejerk before I put myself through the ordeal of a Moviebob video. That's how much of a failure Bob is, and the viewer counts show it. He knows that and he can't stand it.

Edit: I just saw this retardation.

1662016923118.png

Sure, the Nazis were all about free speech, they were famous for it! Remember all those book burnings, roundups, sticking dissenting voices into death camps? They loved free speech and different opinions!

How do these morons tie their own shoelaces?
 
Bob is a fart huffing, terminally online sperg with heaps of free time on his hands, he should be the perfect audience for a Mauler video. Yet Mauler has "wrong opinions" on movies (despite objectivity not being a real you guys) so Bob can't stand him.

I quite like Mauler and the gang but not nearly enough to stomach their half day-long circlejerks. But it's the fanbase I take real issue with. They applaud and get excited when he releases these absurdly long videos as if it is some badge of honour that they have the spare time to watch a 6 hour review of a film people stopped talking about months ago. They're consoomers of a different stripe that parrot Mauler's opinions instead of forming their own. And really, if you need 7+ hours to explain why The Last Jedi is a steaming heap of shit your writing is probably on par with that movie.

Yet despite their flaws I don't have a problem with it and it's fine those videos exist. I'd much rather sit through every EFAP circlejerk before I put myself through the ordeal of a Moviebob video. That's how much of a failure Bob is, and the viewer counts show it. He knows that and he can't stand it.

Edit: I just saw this retardation.

View attachment 3665222
Sure, the Nazis were all about free speech, they were famous for it! Remember all those book burnings, roundups, sticking dissenting voices into death camps? They loved free speech and different opinions!

How do these morons tie their own shoelaces?
These morons ackshually literally think that support of "Freeze Peach" is just a fig leaf for getting bigoted opinions mainstreamed so that when they gain 'full control', they can 'revert' to full 'book burning form'.
 
Winnie The Pooh x Friday the 13th. This reminds Bobby of his fantasy of wresting Harry Potter from the bloodstained hands of J. K. Rowling.
(BTW Bobby knows Lit Academics and Lit Academics care for Harry Potter)
View attachment 3661394
lmao @ Robert thinking they were unsettled by his question, rather than those ivy academics being horrified that their party was infiltrated by some white trash dude who wouldn't stop talking about a children's book
 
lmao @ Robert thinking they were unsettled by his question, rather than those ivy academics being horrified that their party was infiltrated by some white trash dude who wouldn't stop talking about a children's book
I love how Bob makes it sound like he was invited to parties that featured Harvahd brats halfway through midterms. Who the fuck would ever invite him? His lesbican stockbroker beard? Somehow I doubt Bob was actually invited to these shindigs but somehow managed to find out about them and crash them. Hell, he can't even keep his stories straight; previously on "Moviebob goes to swanky Hahvahd watering holes", he was claiming he went to drinking establishments that were frequented by Ivy League students partying off their midterms. So which is it, Bob? Stumbling upon Harvahd Watering Holes ™️, or allegedly being invited to Hahvahd frat parties? Or both? :optimistic:
 
Winnie The Pooh x Friday the 13th. This reminds Bobby of his fantasy of wresting Harry Potter from the bloodstained hands of J. K. Rowling.
(BTW Bobby knows Lit Academics and Lit Academics care for Harry Potter)
View attachment 3661394

lmao @ Robert thinking they were unsettled by his question, rather than those ivy academics being horrified that their party was infiltrated by some white trash dude who wouldn't stop talking about a children's book
You got me to read those tweets and it's somehow even dumber than I expected. It's a complete non-sequitur rant. He thinks a debate about whether or not copyright should be extended to prevent things from falling into the public domain will involve... debating whether or not some third party should be able to claim ownership over someone else's copyright without buying it? And somehow this concern for things, which should allow other people to just take someone's copyright including the original still alive author, will be important even though things have been falling into the public domain forever without anybody caring to where they want to rewrite copyright completely into some new strange form? (Not to mention that none of us will be alive when stuff like Harry Potter actually falls into the public domain.)

If he burst this argument onto the "Lit Academics" (who wouldn't know anything about copyright anyway) the same way he did that guy on Twitter no wonder he unsettled them and ruined the evening.
 
Edit: I just saw this retardation.

View attachment 3665222
Sure, the Nazis were all about free speech, they were famous for it! Remember all those book burnings, roundups, sticking dissenting voices into death camps? They loved free speech and different opinions!

How do these morons tie their own shoelaces?

These morons ackshually literally think that support of "Freeze Peach" is just a fig leaf for getting bigoted opinions mainstreamed so that when they gain 'full control', they can 'revert' to full 'book burning form'.
The Nazis evil plan in Weimar Germany was to make sure there was the actual maximum amount of free speech ever to exist in any country, then say all their Nazi stuff, let everyone just agree with the Nazi shit since it's so clearly objectively correct*, take power freely and fairly through elections and then do the Nazi shit everyone supported after they heard it.

Just ignore that probably Nazi propaganda about how Weimar clamped down hard on the free press/speech/etc., specifically outlawed the Nazi Party at times, threw members in prison and banned them from speaking in public, the Nazis never won a majority in an election but were handed power anyway, the Communists were equally devoted to ending the Republic, etc.

*DO NOT TAKE THIS PART OF MY POST OUT OF CONTEXT
 
The Nazis evil plan in Weimar Germany was to make sure there was the actual maximum amount of free speech ever to exist in any country, then say all their Nazi stuff, let everyone just agree with the Nazi shit since it's so clearly objectively correct*, take power freely and fairly through elections and then do the Nazi shit everyone supported after they heard it.

Just ignore that probably Nazi propaganda about how Weimar clamped down hard on the free press/speech/etc., specifically outlawed the Nazi Party at times, threw members in prison and banned them from speaking in public, the Nazis never won a majority in an election but were handed power anyway, the Communists were equally devoted to ending the Republic, etc.

*DO NOT TAKE THIS PART OF MY POST OUT OF CONTEXT
More like, both the Nazis and Commies were pretty fucked up.
 
I love how Bob makes it sound like he was invited to parties that featured Harvahd brats halfway through midterms. Who the fuck would ever invite him? His lesbican stockbroker beard? Somehow I doubt Bob was actually invited to these shindigs but somehow managed to find out about them and crash them. Hell, he can't even keep his stories straight; previously on "Moviebob goes to swanky Hahvahd watering holes", he was claiming he went to drinking establishments that were frequented by Ivy League students partying off their midterms. So which is it, Bob? Stumbling upon Harvahd Watering Holes ™️, or allegedly being invited to Hahvahd frat parties? Or both? :optimistic:
If this happened (it didn't) it would go the same way his twitter interactions go. Two people having a nice discussion about something when Bob inserts himself between them. Before either can say "who the fuck are you and how dare you interrupt us" he starts asserting that he is correct before going on an unrelated tangent. The looks of comfort and disgust would be entirely justified, but not because of Bob's overwhelmingly superior intellect.

If he was actually invited to an event like this it would absolutely be one of those "invite a retard as a joke" parties, and Bob was the winning entry.
 
I love how Bob makes it sound like he was invited to parties that featured Harvahd brats halfway through midterms. Who the fuck would ever invite him? His lesbican stockbroker beard? Somehow I doubt Bob was actually invited to these shindigs but somehow managed to find out about them and crash them. Hell, he can't even keep his stories straight; previously on "Moviebob goes to swanky Hahvahd watering holes", he was claiming he went to drinking establishments that were frequented by Ivy League students partying off their midterms. So which is it, Bob? Stumbling upon Harvahd Watering Holes ™️, or allegedly being invited to Hahvahd frat parties? Or both? :optimistic:
He knows he'd get thrown out quickly and would instead hide in the bushes nearby, eavesdropping on conversations and thinking about all the witty comebacks and amazing insights he would have said if he'd actually been in there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back