Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[StraightShooter]

Black conservatives occupy a special place of hatred in the hearts of SJWs like Bob and his overlords. Sheriff Clarke takes it a step further: not only is he an outspoken Republican, he's a police officer. Words like "house nigger" or "Uncle Tom" aren't even close to venomous enough for that kind of betrayal in their world. The absolute hatred these people have for POCs who they demand toe the party line but don't is staggering.

What's weird is that on some political forums online, I've run into some blacks who are hardcore Democrats because they support welfare and view Republicans as the "racist party", but are hardcore religious fundamentalists on the social issues, such as viewing homosexuality as a sin.

Somewhat surprised that Bob didn't go all out and widen his "Middle American Dead Zone". Also who thinks that Ohio would be part of a utopian East Coast USA? The place is home to Cleveland.

Wasn't aware that Minnesota. Illinois, and Michigan were bastions of conservatism; seems that Bob doesn't even have his basic geographical knowledge.

For that matter, the majority of California outside of mainly metropolitan LA and San Fransisco is fairly conservative; it's just viewed as a "blue state" because of the dense populations in those areas; same with "upsate New York" as opposed to NYC as far as I know.

I know, I was basing it off him talking about how the "coastal elites" need to separate themselves from the rest of the country.

Well if California's "Calexit" petition to secede went through, then that would be 50+ electoral votes the Democrats would never get again, and it'd be the end of federal welfare and bailouts for their failing economy, so maybe wouldn't be that bad.

 

[Adolf_Ash]

So he's just gonna ignore the fact that those "worthless mid states" are the primary agricultural providers for the country and that the US would keel over like a dead bug without them. It would be like the british empire without the colonies. And we all know well how that went.

 

[RockVolnutt]

So he's just gonna ignore the fact that those "worthless mid states" are the primary agricultural providers for the country and that the US would keel over like a dead bug without them. It would be like the british empire without the colonies. And we all know well how that went.

"Muh globalization", we'll just buy our goods from bumfuck, India or some place after we establish an One World Government. American nationalism is way too inferior past.

Spoiler

I admit to not being that well versed in politics but is globalization supposed to sound like an exceptional rebranding of imperialism or is that something that only exists in people like Bob's heads?

 

[Absolutego]

So he's just gonna ignore the fact that those "worthless mid states" are the primary agricultural providers for the country and that the US would keel over like a dead bug without them. It would be like the british empire without the colonies. And we all know well how that went.

East coast Democrats in particular like to remind everyone "California is the biggest agricultural producer in the country", forgetting that if you get more than 45 minutes away from LA or San Francisco (aka where all that produce is grown) you're in deeply red territory.

 

[AngeloTheWizard]

"Muh globalization", we'll just buy our goods from bumfuck, India or some place after we establish an One World Government. American nationalism is way too inferior past.

Spoiler

I admit to not being that well versed in politics but is globalization supposed to sound like an exceptional rebranding of imperialism or is that something that only exists in people like Bob's heads?

Not exactly. Globalization has three major "sub" components, economic, cultural, and political. Of those three, economic globalization is happening-goods and services move across borders every single day, and while it's not exactly "free" (still gotta file the proper paperwork), the fact that it exists puts it miles ahead of political globalization. Cultural Globalization is exactly what we're doing here on the Farms: A global exchange of ideas. Of the three, it's the strongest.

Political globalization is the "One World Government" you already mentioned, and is probably what everyone thinks of when they hear the term globalization. It's never going to happen because people will say "fuck you!" and go off on their own.

To answer your spoilered question, no, it's not, not really. I've grossly simplified the three things, but imperialism is all about gobbling up territory for yourself, to hell with the people there, while globalization is a mite bit more cooperative in the end. There are some similarities though, so calling it an exceptional rebranding of imperialism is not inaccurate. And even then, the dream that people like Bob have-of a world united under one government-is just that, a dream. So, you're correct-on BOTH counts.

 

[RockVolnutt]

Not exactly. Globalization has three major "sub" components, economic, cultural, and political. Of those three, economic globalization is happening-goods and services move across borders every single day, and while it's not exactly "free" (still gotta file the proper paperwork), the fact that it exists puts it miles ahead of political globalization. Cultural Globalization is exactly what we're doing here on the Farms: A global exchange of ideas. Of the three, it's the strongest.

Political globalization is the "One World Government" you already mentioned, and is probably what everyone thinks of when they hear the term globalization. It's never going to happen because people will say "fuck you!" and go off on their own.

To answer your spoilered question, no, it's not, not really. I've grossly simplified the three things, but imperialism is all about gobbling up territory for yourself, to hell with the people there, while globalization is a mite bit more cooperative in the end. There are some similarities though, so calling it an exceptional rebranding of imperialism is not inaccurate. And even then, the dream that people like Bob have-of a world united under one government-is just that, a dream. So, you're correct-on BOTH counts.

The reason I was asking is because most of the time I see people go on about a globalist future, they describe this weird world where mega corporations like Disney and Apple are like gods and everything works through a very western (usually American) view of the world. There's also the fact someone like Bob views immigrants and foreign labor as a cheap stepping stone until we get automation. At that point I don't really see the difference as it's still going to require taking territories and raping the shit out of them to enforce this. You still end up at the same end point of giant companies controlling everything and infighting with each other.

Globalization in the sense of "Goods and ideas get shared across the world" sounds like making an obvious statement.

 

[Enclave Supremacy]

The reason I was asking is because most of the time I see people go on about a globalist future, they describe this weird world where mega corporations like Disney and Apple are like gods and everything works through a very western (usually American) view of the world. There's also the fact someone like Bob views immigrants and foreign labor as a cheap stepping stone until we get automation. At that point I don't really see the difference as it's still going to require taking territories and raping the shit out of them to enforce this. You still end up at the same end point of giant companies controlling everything and infighting with each other.

Globalization in the sense of "Goods and ideas get shared across the world" sounds like making an obvious statement.

I don't know if Bob has ever actually endorsed the exploitation of cheap overseas labour - it's just the obvious result of his rhetoric. That Bob can't see that and the other obvious out-comes from his globalist fantasy shows just how immature and impractical his world-view is. We'll all be living in a techno-utopia rather than Shadowrun without the magic.

We all come together and all the money on the military is just spend on "science" (nothing specific, just abstracts like "progress") until we become an enlightened, multicultural, post-scarcity society ala Star Trek and other 1960's pulpy sci-fi. It's all very trite.

That everything will be gobbled up by mega-corporations against the backdrop of low employment, massive national debt and a glacial legal system that hasn't adapted is beyond Bob.

 

[Positron]

That everything will be gobbled up by mega-corporations against the backdrop of low employment, massive national debt and a glacial legal system that hasn't adapted is beyond Bob.

This is nothing that can't be solved by a benevolent female pee o'sea world leader. Just as in the Iron Man comic, corporate mogul Tony Stark voluntarily gives up his Iron Man suit because he recognize the genius of that girl.

 

[RockVolnutt]

This is nothing that can't be solved by a benevolent female pee o'sea world leader. Just as in the Iron Man comic, corporate mogul Tony Stark voluntarily gives up his Iron Man suit because he recognize the genius of that girl.

Actually he gave up because some fascist white bitch put him in a coma. Riri stole his suit after.

Spoiler

That's not a joke. Civil War 2 was shit

 

[A Random]

Bob's so myopic he can't even figure out all he's doing is replacing one class of 'undesirables' with another, right? What does he think the incoming Mexicans, Indians, Syrians, and every other Muslim under the sun will do when they arrive on the US? NOT take the shitty 'jerbs' he hates so much?

 

[BR55]

This is a screenshot from the vid, and tells you everything you need to know:

Bob's not a Libertarian, his fascination with Galt and Atlas Shrugged is that he too feels like an ubermensch oppressed by the inferior specimens who keep holding him back.

Galt leaving the gulch and taking over NYC to turn it into a fascist dictatorship is the kind of society Bob shills for.

That map is the most retarded thing I have ever seen from a politics standpoint. First in his flyover hellhole he lumps in swing states like Wisconsin, Colorado, New Mexico, and Iowa with Red states like Nebraska, Kansas, and Texas and Blue states like Illinois. Second in his coastal utopia he puts the likes of California and New England alongside swing states like Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania with Red states like Arizona , Utah, Georgia, South Carolina, Kentucky, and West Virginia. With how much he spergs about Trump country you think he would have which states are Inferior and Superior memorized by now.

 

[A Random]

Those states aren't 'central America' and supposedly once the planet went to shit, they'd be converted to the Cult of Hillary.

 

[Kyria the Great]

Bob's so myopic he can't even figure out all he's doing is replacing one class of 'undesirables' with another, right? What does he think the incoming Mexicans, Indians, Syrians, and every other Muslim under the sun will do when they arrive on the US? NOT take the shitty 'jerbs' he hates so much?

Also this pairs with the assumption that minority groups believe in everything that these social justice types believe in. For the most part, most immigrant groups are fairly socially conservative (especially muslims from the Gulf states and great deals of Northern Africa) and that bringing more of these people here for cheap labor is going to not only solve problems, but these groups are going to accept feminism, LGBT rights, and other liberal views on society.

Speaking of all this, does Bob believe that race is culture like so many SJWs and Alt-Righters?

 

[friedshrimp]

Also this pairs with the assumption that minority groups believe in everything that these social justice types believe in. For the most part, most immigrant groups are fairly socially conservative (especially muslims from the Gulf states and great deals of Northern Africa) and that bringing more of these people here for cheap labor is going to not only solve problems, but these groups are going to accept feminism, LGBT rights, and other liberal views on society.

Exactly what I said. In these third world countries the poor outnumber the rich, not everyone can go to college, and religion is a replacement for education in most cases. Not to mention the idea of family, tradition, etc is much more ingrained there than in the USA/Europe, who strive more for individualism or making friends.

Honestly, the only reason immigrants don't vote republican is due to muh deportation.

 

[Kyria the Great]

Exactly what I said. In these third world countries the poor outnumber the rich, not everyone can go to college, and religion is a replacement for education in most cases. Not to mention the idea of family, tradition, etc is much more ingrained there than in the USA/Europe, who strive more for individualism or making friends.

Honestly, the only reason immigrants don't vote republican is due to muh deportation.

Hit the nail on the head with this one.

This is now getting old, but still to this day I am perplexed by Bob's love of Atlas Shrugged where he believes that exceptional individuals (aka Coastal Elites) are being held back by others ( Conservatives and Middle America) and thinks they should take the reigns of power and seems to really love Objectivism, yet he hates the freedom and government distrust ideals of libertarians. He also seems to wholehearted believe in Moral Relativism (that there is no objective right or wrong in society, except against Conservatives) which nakedly shows with his now infamous, "No Bad Tactics, Only bad targets" quote.

Bob's viewpoints of the world should contradict themselves except he seems to use moral concepts of Post-Modernism to quilt together a worldview that gives him any outlet to believe he and certain others are supreme while a large majority/minority is holding their perfect world back and something drastic must be done. Honestly, if Bob wasn't a sad, fatass, mediocre internet critic I would be genuinely afraid of him given even the slightest amount of power

 

[TheImportantFart]

Hit the nail on the head with this one.

This is now getting old, but still to this day I am perplexed by Bob's love of Atlas Shrugged where he believes that exceptional individuals (aka Coastal Elites) are being held back by others ( Conservatives and Middle America) and thinks they should take the reigns of power and seems to really love Objectivism, yet he hates the freedom and government distrust ideals of libertarians. He also seems to wholehearted believe in Moral Relativism (that there is no objective right or wrong in society, except against Conservatives) which nakedly shows with his now infamous, "No Bad Tactics, Only bad targets" quote.

Bob's viewpoints of the world should contradict themselves except he seems to use moral concepts of Post-Modernism to quilt together a worldview that gives him any outlet to believe he and certain others are supreme while a large majority/minority is holding their perfect world back and something drastic must be done. Honestly, if Bob wasn't a sad, fatass, mediocre internet critic I would be genuinely afraid of him given even the slightest amount of power

To be fair, Objectivism isn't necessarily a left-right thing and as others have pointed out, Bob isn't really a leftist, he's a post-partisan technocrat.

 

[Kyria the Great]

To be fair, Objectivism isn't necessarily a left-right thing and as others have pointed out, Bob isn't really a leftist, he's a post-partisan technocrat.

The technocrat part is what really perplexes me as well. In a technocracy, it would be the likes of scientist, engineers, Masters or higher College educated, and other elites would be making the choices for all of society (making society completely deterministic) yet Bob believes he would benefit from this kind of society? Also does anyone know why he thinks that intelligence and education determines morality as he seems to believe that stupidity is the worst offense one can commit.

 

[Darndirty]

The technocrat part is what really perplexes me as well. In a technocracy, it would be the likes of scientist, engineers, Masters or higher College educated, and other elites would be making the choices for all of society (making society completely deterministic) yet Bob believes he would benefit from this kind of society? Also does anyone know why he thinks that intelligence and education determines morality as he seems to believe that stupidity is the worst offense one can commit.

The Turkey never knows what voting for Christmas means for them in the end. That's why their turkeys.

 

[Ruin]

Bob's so myopic he can't even figure out all he's doing is replacing one class of 'undesirables' with another, right? What does he think the incoming Mexicans, Indians, Syrians, and every other Muslim under the sun will do when they arrive on the US? NOT take the shitty 'jerbs' he hates so much?

Their objection to poor whites is because they vote Republican. Bob and his ilk are absolutely fine with a permanent underclass that relies entirety on welfare as long as they vote Democrat.

 

[Kyria the Great]

Their objection to poor whites is because they vote Republican. Bob and his ilk are absolutely fine with a permanent underclass that relies entirety on welfare as long as they vote Democrat.

For all their objections to exploiting other minorities, countries, cultures, Bob and his ilk seem perfectly content with exploiting the same people for their own cynical reasons. Personally, I prefer the outright Imperialist and slaver because at the very least they are honest and upfront with their intentions, unlike these folks who argue basically for the same thing but mask themselves under a moral good by giving the underclass breadcrumbs and a house to sleep in